• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 
What am I doing wrong???
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> High Range Development
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
crzytptman
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 03 Sep 2003
Posts: 4900
Location: Escondido CA (just north of 'Dego)

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

First of all, I agree with Bill - that's not enough practice time. Then, I feel the comments from kramergfy are almost 180 degrees from correct, as John said with his .
Quote:
I've found that for me, filling all the way through the chest can cause too much tension in the sternum and neck area. For me, I can still take in enough air if I don't expand my chest too much when I breath this way. (the chest will expand some naturally, but I don't make an effort to expand it in the way I would if I was doing something atheltic)

Dude, you are doing something athletic, you're playing the trumpet! Athletes are not tense when they are in the zone, executing their sport.

The tried and true methods involve deep respiration, and development and control of wind power. That doesn't mean you tense up and blow as hard as you can. But, you breathe deeply and allow your body to expand naturally. Since lungs are behind the rib cage, that's what expands. Get the books "Science of Breath" and "Brass Playing is No Harder Than Deep Breathing".
Quote:
Contract the abdominal muscles so that they push outward.

I think this is how you get a hernia. For upper register playing, pull in and support the lungs.
I recommend you check out Claude Gordon's materials, and as always, seek the advice of a good teacher who's good at what you want to learn.
_________________
Crazy Nate

" Strive to have a great day, full of learning and enlightenment, using the mind that God gave you." - CTM
"Before playing your horn each time, grab the nuts and twist 'em tight" - Tom Turner
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
afp
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 25 Dec 2002
Posts: 751
Location: SW Oregon

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know what the required amount of practice time is, but I do know you need to do it when you are young. There is no way can practice 3 hrs a day now. I leave for work between 6:30 and 7:00 and get home between 5:30 and 7:30. Then I have the never ending list of tasks all middle-aged dads have. There just isn't enough time to get everything done that has to be done.

However, if you build a strong set of skills now they will be easier to maintain when you get older and have a lot less time.
_________________
Came back to trumpet in 2001 after a 23 year layoff


Carol 500T (Lightweight) Trumpet, Wedge 7CC with Qm backbore

Carol CTR 506R Trumpet, Wedge 7BC with Qm backbore

Carol CFL-620R Flugel, Custom Wedge MP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
trumpet57
New Member


Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Location: Windham, NH

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:52 am    Post subject: What am I doing Wrong? Reply with quote

Check out youtube.com. You can get some pretty good adive (free lessons) there. I picked up some great tips that have helped me alot. One video is of Jim Manley with (I think) one of the trumpet players from the Airmen of Note. He talks about and demonstrates how little air it actually takes to play high notes. I was amazed how true it was when I tried what I saw in the practice room. There is another video with one of the guys from the Airmen of Note talking about breathing. He said, there are two steps with breathing. Step one is breath in, the second is breath out. Many palyers add a third betwen these two called hold. What this does is close your throat interupting the flow of air. I had been doing this third step since day one. It is taking some time to change this bad habit but this little tidbit in conjunction with not over blowing (trying to pump too much air through the little hole in the mouthpiece) has made significant improvements in my endurance, ease in playing, increase in range and produces a great cutting lead sound. Best of all, these were free lessons. I play on a 1964 King Silver Flair with a Marcinkiewicz, Roger Ingrham mouthpiece.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fleebat
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 1906
Location: Nashville, TN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First of all, clear your mind of all the "do this/do that" stuff for a minute, and consider the guys who nail the high range day-in, day-out... for money. Watch clips of Bergeron, Englebright, Sandoval, Ingram, Bogart, Snooky, et al. You will notice that they all seem pretty relaxed. A nice fat G, from them, typically doesn't come with a scrunched face, a more-rigid posture, or, in fact, any drastic physical change from notes an octave lower. A relaxed approach is what consistently works for the vast majority of successful lead players.

(Recommended that you find the Michael Manley youtube vid about breathing low, to see how little it actually takes to play high).

Secondly, if you study with or research material from these guys, you'll very rarely encounter ideas like "do this with your XXXX" or "move your XXXX muscles like..." You will hear about taking a nice, full breath, playing "through" every note, etc. AND you will hear about focused, consistent time in the practice room.

I always think that anyone who asks "how much practice time does it take" needs to first of all take time to adjust their perspective and attitude (no offense). The guys who get really good - whether with high notes, or improv, or symphonic playing, or in any style, are typically the guys who - at least in their formative years - have to MAKE themselves put the horn down. Yes, you can overpractice to the point of doing more harm than good if you're doing stupid things. But you have a long, long way to go before that could happen.

The comeback player, or the part-timer wanting to get to the next level who actually accomplishes his goals is typically the kind of guy whose family has to MAKE him stop playing so he can eat dinner. He's nearly late for his day job sometimes because he couldn't put the horn down. He has no idea what sitcoms are currently on the air because... you guessed it. Note here that practice can include transcribing, study, etc. Not saying you should have the horn on your face 8 hours a day. (However, I regularly put in four or more hours, and you'll find a lot of guys at schools like Indiana who do even more). The point is...

Non-productive outlook: "How much of my time and effort do I have to trade or invest to be able to play like I want to play?"

Really productive outlook: "Man, I can't wait to feel that great, easy, "power steering" thing that happens after I finish my Claude Gordon long tones!"

or

"Cool! I've got a complete two hours of free time here! I can do my whole Adam-inspired routine, rest a little, then finish memorizing 'Joy Spring.'"

or

"Wow, those Reinhart exercises are tough! I'd better have a glass of water & take twenty minutes or so before I look at that Phat Band transcription!"

The thing is, you want to develop an attitude that says, "every minute I spend on focused, sensible practice gets me closer to playing the daylights out of this horn. I can't wait to spend my next practice minutes!"

You can find world-class players - lead, big-band, pop, combo jazz... any style - who got there through almost any good teacher's method. The thing they all have in common is FOCUSED TIME WITH THE HORN ON THEIR FACES, WITH ATTENTION TO IMPROVEMENT. NOT a well-tracked record of how much time they "had" to put in.

That said, if you've got a good G sometimes, you're likely doing plenty right, so your original question, "What am I doing wrong" is probably moot. Very likely, what's up is that you're impatient for development. Let's say that again: development.

Let's use an analogy; say, tennis.

A really good teaching tennis pro can tell you almost exactly what to do with every part of your body. Backhand like this. Keep your forearm like that, swing from here. Make sure your body is placed like this or that to the path of the ball. Tweak your grip this way, make sure your leading foot is like this for the overhead, and your back foot like that. And on, and on, and on.

But if a pro gave you all that information, and you understood it, even worked on it for a bit until you could physically do the things he prescribed, would you be ready for Wimbledon? Nope. That would come only after you've put in whatever time you needed to put in to realize your personal potential - while applying all those "right" ideas from the pro. Not to mention the time it took you to absorb it all so it was second nature. And for each of us, that amount of time is different. Also, "time," in terms of development, isn't measured in hours-per-day. Development is seen in weeks, months, years - of consistent, FOCUSED practice. You can get a big hint about what that means just by looking at the titles of the major method books; a large number have "daily" somewhere in the title. Borrowing a term from Mr. Adam, all the great methods advocate some kind of daily routine.

Note: A small bit of development is strength - great players, from Herseth to Sandoval to Brecker to Hargrove, will tell you that it doesn't take much physical, chop strength (muscular strength). It's about flow, about learning to "allow" the system to work like you want it to. Struggling players have the look of someone who's trying to steer a tractor. Players who've got it happening tend to look more like they're driving a new Mercedes. They're "letting" it happen as much as "making" it happen. And that takes... yup... time. Read "Zen In The Art of Archery," and "Effortless Mastery."

If you'd been playing for years and you were crapping out at high C, you might have good reason to re-visit the minutia of what you're doing physically. But I would bet you just need to work on getting a "when can I practice" mindset that replaces the "how much do I have to practice" pattern, focus on playing with a great sound and good air support (which has nothing to do with blowing harder), and keeping your mind on the idea of development.

You're looking for a "thing" you can "do" to make your goal happen. But reaching a goal is almost never a matter of flipping some kind of switch, or changing one physical element. It's usually arrived at through stages of growth.

My two cents.

Rusty Russell


Last edited by Fleebat on Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Billy B
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Posts: 4275
Location: Des Moines

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good stuff Rusty. Much of what you say are things that a teacher does to guide a student. I often have students write out their daily schedule. Then we write in practice time. In about three weeks this becomes a habit that becomes sorely missed by the student if they stray from the schedule. At this point they have become self motivated and my job becomes a piece of cake.
_________________
Bill Bergren
Obstacles are what appear when you take your eye off of the goal.
www.synergyjazz.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Fleebat
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 1906
Location: Nashville, TN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I should mention that I don't advocate timing practice sessions. I know some do, and succeed that way, but I don't.

If I (or a student I'm working with) sits down with the idea that we'll put in, say, an hour, it's much easier to fall into the mindset of putting in time. That's how prisoners view things. How you feel when you're waiting in line at the driver's license station. It's not conducive to accomplishing things (again, for me).

Rather, I advocate goal-oriented practice. I sit down with the idea of cleaning up an Arban study - getting it to a certain point. Or playing a complex line over a half-diminished chord, for example, smoothly in every key. Smoothing out a flexibility study from "Flexus." Playing a Randy Brecker transcription better. Cleaner. Without struggle. Faster. Whatever. The mindset that grows in that way is one in which you're accomplishing something musical. And it fosters development. And it turns you into the kind of player who has a hard time putting the horn down.

All this is, of course, after I've played through my routine (I'm an Adam follower). And I usually have more goals on the list than I can get to, even though I have a lot of time to practice.

I haven't watched the clock while practicing since I was a real little guy (and I'm a certified geeze).

Edit: That last statement wasn't exactly true. I do watch the clock sometimes, but it's more like, "Dang... I can only play twenty more minutes, and then I've got to take off for that client meeting."

The part about being a geeze though... that's absolutely true.

RR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Kraken
Veteran Member


Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 196
Location: 805 Area Code

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rusty Russell

Very sound take !!!

Wise Insight!

I enjoyed your RUSTY Rant, appreciated.
_________________
1947 Selmer Grand Prix
US Air Force 1974 - 1980
Comback player start date: 9/06/2009
Comeback Player end date: Till Death Do Us Part
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Fleebat
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 1906
Location: Nashville, TN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, thanks. I'm glad. I kick myself sometimes because it seems everything I post here is a rant. Hope everyone knows it's well-intentioned.

RR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhopkins7
Regular Member


Joined: 05 Feb 2010
Posts: 21
Location: SC

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From my experience, regimented practice in terms of allocating specified time to specific exercises has its benefits. Upon starting college, I was in the habit of practicing for huge amounts of time, but with no real plan. My teacher had me write down everything I did, and time invested in it. He then came up with a very strict regiment of "10 minutes on Clarke...then rest...10 minutes on flow studies...then rest...etc.". I wrestled with this through a semester or two, but eventually got into a very, very solid routine. Then, my teacher said "Take that whole thing, and toss it out. You've learned how to be disciplined and focused in allocating time to specific exercises. Now, take that discipline and focus and instead apply it to specific RESULTS. Don't spend 20 minutes on excerpts...spend 20 minutes on getting that excerpt to sound like you want it to sound. If you get there in 10, then move on to the next RESULT you want to achieve". Not suprisingly, this led to intelligent, results-oriented practice. My 2 cents, for what it is worth, is that a strict regimen is a wonderful tool to develop intelligent, meaningful practice habits...and intelligent, meaningful practice habits yield the ability to play like each of us wants to play, however that may be.
_________________
-Jon
Getzen Genesis 3003 Bb
Bach Strad MLV/72 Bb
Bach 229 C
Warburton mpcs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
afp
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 25 Dec 2002
Posts: 751
Location: SW Oregon

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The comeback player, or the part-timer wanting to get to the next level who actually accomplishes his goals is typically the kind of guy whose family has to MAKE him stop playing so he can eat dinner. He's nearly late for his day job sometimes because he couldn't put the horn down. He has no idea what sitcoms are currently on the air because... you guessed it.


I somewhat disagree with the above. Without question, a positive attitude and enthusiasm for what you are doing are critical elements to success, but you don't have to make something an obsession to achieve a high level of success. In fact, obsession can cause so many problems in others areas of your life that you wind up undoing the very thing you were obsessing about. The pro musician ranks are filled with examples of that......................................

I say a person needs to have discipline and balance in their life to achieve long term success. I can cerdibly speak on this because I managed to achieve high success in couple of areas. I was a successful USAF pilot for 24 years, and a successful competition shooter for a couple of years. Both of these pursuits involved intense motivation and focus initially, but always in balance with other areas of my life. I was NEVER late for work, and neither did I sacrifice faith or family.

I will say it is easier to find time when you are young and single, so in many ways success can came more quickly. Then again, smart practice on a very limited time schedule in my middle age has yeilded results with trumpet far beyond what I achieved when I was young.

Anyway, my advice to someone with limited time who wants to play trumpet is too keep the trumpet in it's proper place in your life, don't impose artifical limits on yourself, and practice as much as you can even when you are not so motivated. Emotion will take you a little ways, while discipline and balance will take you all the way.
_________________
Came back to trumpet in 2001 after a 23 year layoff


Carol 500T (Lightweight) Trumpet, Wedge 7CC with Qm backbore

Carol CTR 506R Trumpet, Wedge 7BC with Qm backbore

Carol CFL-620R Flugel, Custom Wedge MP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fleebat
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 1906
Location: Nashville, TN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I was in the habit of practicing for huge amounts of time, but with no real plan.


... which, I would say, will almost always be a problem. Nowhere in either of my posts did I remotely suggest one shouldn't have a plan. You wrote:

Quote:
very, very solid routine.


Please note that I suggested exactly that.

and,
Quote:

then move on to the next RESULT you want to achieve


does not conflict with anything I wrote. What you refer to as a "result," I called achieving a goal.

Also, I think that when you wrote:

Quote:
a very strict regiment


I'm guessing you probably meant "regimen"

Lastly,

Quote:
Not suprisingly, this led to intelligent, results-oriented practice.


...which is exactly what I am/was advocating. The point (which can easily be gleaned from context, wherein a discussion ensued about how much timeone should practice), is that simply committing to a specific amount of time - with no goals (results) set and no plan to achieve them - would not get it done.

And to afp,

By definition, an obsession is an attachment to a thing, person or activity that is so pervasive as to eliminate the desire to do anything else and compromise your ability to focus well on other things when you would like to. I did not suggest refusing dinner, or never watching a tv show, or missing work because you were unable to break a practice obsession. If your favorite thing in life is fishing, and you do it every chance you get, that's not an obsession. It's spending a lot of time doing your favorite thing. If, on the other hand, you quit your job, screw up your family and damage your health because you can't break the spell of your fishing desire long enough to spend time with your family, go to work or eat, you're obsessed.

I do not see anything in either of my posts about sacrificing faith or family (refusing to come to dinner might qualify... but please note that I didn't suggest that). Nor did I suggest being late for work; I said that one's desire to reach a certain goal might nearly make him late for work because he wanted to keep playing his horn. The obvious idea, unless we're going to parse words like I just did, is an advocacy of developing a habit of focused, goal-oriented practice, and trying to make it something one wanted to do, rather than "had" to do.

I have never met a single pro for whom practicing wasn't a favorite thing - or at least an enjoyable thing - to do. Maybe you know some who hate/hated it, but I don't. And for someone who's trying to achieve what would widely be considered a pro-level result (like being able to consistently, always nail that G), the kind of attitude toward practice that I suggest (and that you consider obsession) is almost always required.

You said it yourself;

Quote:
The pro musician ranks are filled with examples of that


So true. There are those who are practice-obsessed, and those who spent time with their instrument to the detriment of all else in life. Does the fact that the pro ranks are filled with examples suggest anything to you about the results? I'd rather have a somewhat balanced life myself (and I do). But I give up many leisure activities so I can devote time to playing. I don't think I'm throwing my life too far out of balance by not watching "CSI - Miami."

That said, I've re-read the OP's original post, and don't find any request for advice on having a balanced life. I do find a request for advice on how an adult player who desires a result in the professional realm might achieve that goal. He was asking for a "thing" he could do - move his tongue a certain way, tuck a lip, change his breathing. I suggested that this kind of "switch" likely wasn't the key for someone at his level. When Faddis began playing a G as his highest note, rather than an F (at age eight or whatever), it wasn't because someone hipped him to a tuck or a pooch or some other "switch" he could flip. It was because he was practicing, a lot, in a focused way toward specific goals. The kids at Indiana (and similar places) who practice constantly do indeed obsess for the time they're there. And a very large number obtain pro-level results, and have the option of pursuing music professionally when they finish school. Very few maintain the crazy practice schedule that studio is known for after they graduate. But they spent some time in that obsessed mode in order to get to the level they eventually achieved.

Again, I don't advocate obsession. But my take on behalf of the OP was/is that he's reached the extent of what he can do without devoting that next level of time and effort to the horn. Others suggested as much. And the attitude with which one approaches that increased effort makes a difference - in fact, makes it possible. (Please note that I did say "at least in the formative stage").

Each of us has a level we can reach without that extra commitment of time/effort. For some, that may be an incredibly high level; for others, not so much. Maybe they can't develop the endurance they need to get through the kinds of gigs they want to do. Maybe they can't articulate well enough to play their favorite piece. Or maybe, like the OP, they own an F and long to own a G. The solutions often presented involve some physical trick or technique, as if the difference between Phil Smith and the guy in the hinterlands who can't get the opening of Mahler 5 to sound right, or between Arturo and the cat who'd love to solo with his community big band but can't handle the material is that Phil and Arturo know a secret place to put their tongues, or which way to move their stomachs when they breathe, or a super-double-secret lip tuck that, if someone would just show those hinterlanders, would make them next in line at the NYP or on the Grammy stage.

My larger point to the OP was that the difference is, in almost every case and allowing for pure talent, one of commitment. We each make the choice; you made the choice for a life that to you seems better balanced, and that allowed you to do something else you were drawn to (and thank you, seriously, for your service to our country). Others make different choices. Some will not do well on a dedicated path and have compromised lives because of it. Others will decide that doing that dedicated thing isn't worth it at any level, and quit whatever it is entirely. Most will work at it as a hobby or serious second pursuit - and these are the ones who will, many of them, look for a "thing" to "do" that will replace that last level of dedication. Thank goodness we have that diversity, even with the difficulty it sometimes brings. I certainly didn't choose a perfectly-balanced middle ground, and I'm very satisfied with my life.

RR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fraserhutch
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 1958
Location: Novato, CA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, I want a table of contents, please
_________________
Callet Sima
Flip Oake's Wild Thing
Flip Oake's Wild Thing Flugel
Reeves mouthpieces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Fleebat
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 1906
Location: Nashville, TN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No problem. I'll send you a download link for $39.95.

RR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John Mohan
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 13 Nov 2001
Posts: 3518
Location: Practicing in the VanderCook College of Music Basement or Studying in the IIT Library

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kramergfy wrote:
John to clarify; I've found that for me, filling all the way through the chest can cause too much tension in the sternum and neck area. For me, I can still take in enough air if I don't expand my chest too much when I breath this way. (the chest will expand some naturally, but I don't make an effort to expand it in the way I would if I was doing something atheltic) If I focus on expanding my mid-back and gut, it works for me, especially for notes above High C.

Also, I think a lot of people make the mistake of sucking in their gut when they think abdominal support, which seems to also contribute to tension in the chest area. But if you contract the abdominal region as if you were going to do a situp, that region would have the sensation of pushing out, not in.


Thanks for replying to me. Now I understand your reasons for suggesting what you suggested.

If you have a problem with getting tense when taking a full breath, I don't think the solution is to avoid taking full breaths, I think the solution is to learn to be relaxed and full at the same time. The Claude Gordon Breathing Exercises will address this issue. When one fills up properly (not overfilling), the feeling is very similar to that of a yawn. The next time you yawn, notice what your body naturally does - it will fill completely with air, with your chest expanding fully, but you will feel completely relaxed as you fill up - this is the way nature intended.

I wrote up a two page document explaining how to do the CG Breathing Exercises that will be part of my method book when I eventually write it. If you would like a copy (and that goes for anybody reading this), send me an email at johnkmohan@gmail.com and I'll attached a copy of it in a reply to you.

When one takes a full breath, one can exert more power, and/or one can exert a certain level of power with less effort than when one is blowing and only half full. Learning to develop the habit of always filling up (but staying relaxed) is the reason I developed such great endurance during my playing career.

As for what you wrote about the abdominal area, if someone creates undue isometric tension in the abdominal region while blowing by trying to push in (or "suck in") the abdomen area more than they should, you’re right – that would not be good. But creating similar isometric tension while moving the abdominal musculature outward in the opposite direction it needs to go when blowing is even worse. The best thing to do is to forget about what the stomach region is doing - it'll take care of itself. Just breathe in a nice full relaxed breath and let the ribs (chest) expand as you do so - this is how nature intended us to breath. And then when you blow, just do so while not allowing the chest to collapse. As you blow, maintain a position of good posture with the chest up – if you do this, all the available muscles will contribute properly to the blowing effort.

The main reason jogging and swimming are so good for brass players is not due to any development of any inordinate amount of blowing-strength in the muscles of expiration (when we breath fast and deep while running or swimming, there isn't much pressure at all that we have to blow against). The main reason jogging and swimming are so good for us brass players is because it helps us to get into the habit of being able to take nice, deep, full, relaxed breaths, completely expanding our chests each time we do so.

I hope this is helpful to you.

Best wishes,

John Mohan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
dbacon
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Nov 2001
Posts: 7500
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"If you have a problem with getting tense when taking a full breath, I don't think the solution is to avoid taking full breaths, I think the solution is to learn to be relaxed and full at the same time."

This is an excellent point...you have to fill up a lot of times no matter what...long phrase FFF...over time you have to develop the skill of inhale full and not fight with the exhale muscles....move air with energy and not fight the inhale system....isometric tension, muscle systems working in opposition to each other...learn how to not under or over blow....called breath control!
_________________
Dave Bacon
Mesa Community College
trumpetbacon@gmail.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kramergfy
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 667

PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

...
_________________
"I'm 73 and I'm still learning." - Maurice Murphy


Last edited by kramergfy on Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:11 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
afp
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 25 Dec 2002
Posts: 751
Location: SW Oregon

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Fleebat"]
Quote:

And to afp,

By definition, an obsession is an attachment to a thing, person or activity that is so pervasive as to eliminate the desire to do anything else and compromise your ability to focus well on other things when you would like to. I did not suggest refusing dinner, or never watching a tv show, or missing work because you were unable to break a practice obsession. If your favorite thing in life is fishing, and you do it every chance you get, that's not an obsession. It's spending a lot of time doing your favorite thing. If, on the other hand, you quit your job, screw up your family and damage your health because you can't break the spell of your fishing desire long enough to spend time with your family, go to work or eat, you're obsessed.


I am glad you acknowledge how bad an obsessive approach is. I wasn't 100% sure that is what you were advocating, but I know of too many people who have gone down that path to their own undoing.

Quote:
The obvious idea, unless we're going to parse words like I just did, is an advocacy of developing a habit of focused, goal-oriented practice, and trying to make it something one wanted to do, rather than "had" to do.


Enjoying to do what we need to do is preferable but not a requirement. We don't always "feel" like practicing. What seperates the men from the boys is having the discipline to practice whether we "feel" like it or not. For me, it's the goal of plying better that drives me to practice when I'd rather be fishing.........................

Quote:
I suggest (and that you consider obsession) is almost always required.


Your original desciption was, for me, painting a picture of obsession vs motivated and frequent practice.

Quote:
That said, I've re-read the OP's original post, and don't find any request for advice on having a balanced life. I do find a request for advice on how an adult player who desires a result in the professional realm might achieve that goal. He was asking for a "thing" he could do - move his tongue a certain way, tuck a lip, change his breathing. I suggested that this kind of "switch" likely wasn't the key for someone at his level. When Faddis began playing a G as his highest note, rather than an F (at age eight or whatever), it wasn't because someone hipped him to a tuck or a pooch or some other "switch" he could flip. It was because he was practicing, a lot, in a focused way toward specific goals. The kids at Indiana (and similar places) who practice constantly do indeed obsess for the time they're there. And a very large number obtain pro-level results, and have the option of pursuing music professionally when they finish school. Very few maintain the crazy practice schedule that studio is known for after they graduate. But they spent some time in that obsessed mode in order to get to the level they eventually achieved.


I personally know the OP, and what he needs to do is to relax when playing in the upper range. He needs "balance" in his approach to playing. I am in a similar place. At about 4 years into my comeback I had developed the strength to play high Gs. However, I was continually using excess tension so I'd quickly lose that upper range. The answer for such a probelm isn't more practice but better practice, focusing on eliminating tension. More practicing with the wrong aproach just makes theings worse.

Quote:
Again, I don't advocate obsession.


Again, I am gald to see that said. I fully concur with the idea of an intense, intelligent, and disciplined effort.
_________________
Came back to trumpet in 2001 after a 23 year layoff


Carol 500T (Lightweight) Trumpet, Wedge 7CC with Qm backbore

Carol CTR 506R Trumpet, Wedge 7BC with Qm backbore

Carol CFL-620R Flugel, Custom Wedge MP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
LeeC
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 25 Feb 2003
Posts: 5164

PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:52 pm    Post subject: Re: What am I doing wrong??? Reply with quote

Derek Watson wrote:
I play lead in the Big Band at my college. I can hit a High G pretty consistently (the G on the fourth ledger line above the staff), not always with the strength I desire though. I'm looking for ways to hit that G and above like a LEAD player.
It feels like I'm blowing as hard as I can. Maybe I need help understanding how to really use my diaphragm efficiently? Where to put my tongue? How to position it in my mouth?
Any ideas?

I play on a Yamaha Custom Z (Bobby Shew model) with a Shilke 10A4A mouthpiece.


Interesting concern. We always seem to want to dial in the extreme upper end of our range first. The older I get though the more I realize that it is my proficiency in rhythm, intonation, accuracy and endurance up to around a High D that keeps me in the gigs.

Not only that but the deficiencies that I notice from other lead players (or 'wannabee' lead players) seem to be in those same four areas. Hardly anyone in the bands i play in is worried about whether I play a High G or A.

I don't know, maybe the O/P has a fine High D and E and such. However the whole complaint reminds me of some advice I got from a restaurateur I worked for back in my college days. An axiom about thrift and avoiding waste. His wisdom applied to finances but turned around it can also apply to chops. His words were:

"Watch the pennies and the dollars take care of themselves".


Applied to lead playing I look at it as:

"Strive for a strong, clear high D all evening long in concert and the G's and A's will take care of themselves"


We see all sorts of tips, tricks and special methods of playing high notes here. Sometimes they even help. However there is so much more to playing the trumpet besides being able to eek out a few high A's. A half dozen or so trumpet players I know probably have higher practice room range than I do but none of them dare compete for the lead book.

With just a solid High D you can handle most college or even professional big band music. If a High G is written just find a comparable lower note in the chord and play that. I'll even do that from time to time if the phrase is really long. I want to sound professional. We have a written high G at the end of a demanding chart in my R & B band. I've never missed any attempt at hitting it but if I feel the need to rest a bit or not waste energy? Will just go for the E below.

No one in the band cares!

Get to own those High D's at full volume with good accuracy and intonation and the G's and A's will follow. They have to. And you'll be several miles ahead of those cats who squeal Double C's but can't use them. The woods are full of kids with practice room Double C's. But a solid lead trumpet player is not all that common.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> High Range Development All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group