• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Working on 2nd Playing



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Orchestral/Chamber Music/Solo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Steve A
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 607
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:35 pm    Post subject: Working on 2nd Playing Reply with quote

So, we spend a lot of time here talking about general trumpet playing exercises, and a reasonable amount about the specific skills needed for good 1st playing. Sometimes, we discuss 2nd playing from a standpoint of balance, blend, ensemble playing, and all these things are great, but I'm hoping that we might get some informed opinions about how to practice some of the specific playing challenges one finds more frequently in 2nd playing, such as cold entrances on low notes, and leaps of big and non-melodic intervals.

Anyone have any ideas about particular ways to improve definition, clarity, consistency, and quality in low notes, and in lines that jump all over the place? (And, other thoughts about specific 2nd playing challenges are also welcome!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dale Proctor
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 6878
Location: Heart of Dixie

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sort of the perennial 2nd player around town. Unless I have quite a bit of playing above the staff to do (which usually doesn't happen on 2nd parts) I play on a larger mouthpiece to help the low notes come out, whether cold or not. For me, that's a 1-1/2C or 3C on trumpet. For cornet, it's a Curry 3BBC. Practicing low notes and cold starts is also helpful. For lines that jump all over the place, I've found working exercises from the Schlossberg book to be a big help. It's entertaining to see someone who plays 1st parts almost exclusively struggle with a 2nd part because of the way the harmony lines are all over the place.
_________________
Olde Towne Brass
www.otbrass.com

Brass Band of Huntsville
www.brassbandofhuntsville.com

"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheiden
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 3569
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems to me that playing 2nd requires nearly all of the skill of playing 1st PLUS a huge burden to listen and match/complement the 1st. I've heard several accomplished players say that they consider playing 2nd to be harder than 1st because of this. I can't imagine any way to improve in this area other than lots of playing with really good 1st players.
_________________
"I'm an engineer, which means I think I know a whole bunch of stuff I really don't."
Charles J Heiden/So Cal
Bach Strad 180ML43*/43 Bb
Yamaha 731 Flugel
Kanstul 920 Picc
Conn 80A Cornet
Bach 3C rim/Bach 1-1/2C underpart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
benlewis
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 21 Jan 2004
Posts: 561
Location: Memphis, TN

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Marc Reese had an article in the ITG Journal a few issues back that addressed this matter. A very insightful and entertaining read…
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jmberinger
Regular Member


Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 20
Location: Orange County, California

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is an interesting topic as not only is the second required to match volume, tonal quality and pitch, but to do so in a manner that promotes and supports the first part. Listening to all of the parts, including the third and possibly the fourth, for the blend and then adding the part to the orchestra can be difficult.

In orchestral works, the rather extensive leaps from the lower register to the unison of an octave, or, in more modern works, playing in a "separate" part and then joining for section work is much more demanding than the first part. And much more entertaining as well.
_________________
John M. Beringer, Jr.
Bach 229 LC (Malone Leadpipe); Bach Bb 180S37; Eastman D/Eb. Bush WX-S Mouthpiece
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ricetrpt
Veteran Member


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 118
Location: Watertown, MA

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a really good topic. I'd love to know what leaping second trumpet parts you are referring to (other than Firebird). A lot of the Beethoven, Haydn, Mozart, etc... second parts have leaps in the parts from octaves to unison, but standard performance practice is for the 2nd trumpet to play these notes down an octave.

Either way, I think that ear training is one of the most important aspects of playing section parts. Often times, the inner parts are so much harder to hear than the melody, and we find ourselves struggling to play in tune. If you can sing, or better yet, solfegge your second and third trumpet parts, the pitch will be MUCH better. It's really challenging, particularly as the music gets more and more complicated. The section parts to the march in the first movement of Shostakovich 5 come to mind.

I think it's also important that a second trumpet player doesn't play too quietly. Those low entrances are often in octaves with the first part, and the bottom octave needs to be stronger than the top for blend and balance. I know that doesn't help with the mechanics of playing those notes, but it may if those notes are being approached timidly. Again, really hearing the pitch before you play it is invaluable.

As far as the mechanics of playing the leaps that may be required in the second trumpet rep, I can't think of a better place to start than page 125 of the Arban book.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peter Bond
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 1229
Location: Metropolitan Opera

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Working on 2nd Playing Reply with quote

Steve A wrote:
So, we spend a lot of time here talking about general trumpet playing exercises, and a reasonable amount about the specific skills needed for good 1st playing. Sometimes, we discuss 2nd playing from a standpoint of balance, blend, ensemble playing, and all these things are great, but I'm hoping that we might get some informed opinions about how to practice some of the specific playing challenges one finds more frequently in 2nd playing, such as cold entrances on low notes, and leaps of big and non-melodic intervals.

Anyone have any ideas about particular ways to improve definition, clarity, consistency, and quality in low notes, and in lines that jump all over the place? (And, other thoughts about specific 2nd playing challenges are also welcome!)


Contrary to what a lot of people think (myself included, 20yrs ago) a good second player does not (musically) chase the first player all over the place, but rather lays down his/her part with rock-solid time and pitch to give the principal something to hang on to. This requires daily attention to fundamentals; time, rhythm, intonation (in the much-neglected low register), attack, and a clear & vibrant tone. Consistency is also important and much appreciated by the principal.
Many play as if second is all about musical anonymity - hiding dynamically or tonally, or making a vague, foggy sound. This fosters uncertainty and is a nightmare for intonation.
Cold entrances? Frequent rests during practice can help practice this.
Try to steer away from practicing as strength training (muy macho trumpet) and more toward finesse. The feeling required for playing much of this stuff is delicate and almost 'dainty' as compared to the sound that is produced when playing efficiently.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ralphnz
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 1564
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was just thinking about this a few weeks ago, while playing 2nd for Brahms' Piano Concerto No. 2. There's one jump in the 2nd movement where we were an octave apart, then a third - I think it was a 13th for me. But there was no time to think about it because there were a whole lot more notes to come, and I still had to cover much more ground than my colleague, rangewise. If only the audience knew how much I stressed over those two notes, how many times I practised that jump...

Nailed it though.

Incidentally, Firebird's coming up later this year. Should I be worried?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laser170323
Veteran Member


Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 132

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:12 am    Post subject: Re: Working on 2nd Playing Reply with quote

Mr. Bond,
I think you write the best posts: informative, funny, and right on the money. Thank you.
Laser170323

Peter Bond wrote:
Steve A wrote:
So, we spend a lot of time here talking about general trumpet playing exercises, and a reasonable amount about the specific skills needed for good 1st playing. Sometimes, we discuss 2nd playing from a standpoint of balance, blend, ensemble playing, and all these things are great, but I'm hoping that we might get some informed opinions about how to practice some of the specific playing challenges one finds more frequently in 2nd playing, such as cold entrances on low notes, and leaps of big and non-melodic intervals.

Anyone have any ideas about particular ways to improve definition, clarity, consistency, and quality in low notes, and in lines that jump all over the place? (And, other thoughts about specific 2nd playing challenges are also welcome!)


Contrary to what a lot of people think (myself included, 20yrs ago) a good second player does not (musically) chase the first player all over the place, but rather lays down his/her part with rock-solid time and pitch to give the principal something to hang on to. This requires daily attention to fundamentals; time, rhythm, intonation (in the much-neglected low register), attack, and a clear & vibrant tone. Consistency is also important and much appreciated by the principal.
Many play as if second is all about musical anonymity - hiding dynamically or tonally, or making a vague, foggy sound. This fosters uncertainty and is a nightmare for intonation.
Cold entrances? Frequent rests during practice can help practice this.
Try to steer away from practicing as strength training (muy macho trumpet) and more toward finesse. The feeling required for playing much of this stuff is delicate and almost 'dainty' as compared to the sound that is produced when playing efficiently.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jmberinger
Regular Member


Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 20
Location: Orange County, California

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I particularly liked the comment of the second providing the “foundation” for the first trumpet with steady pitch/rhythm; and I completely agree with it. When I was primarily playing first in orchestras in college (25 years ago) I was constantly talking to the second and third trumpet to play up in volume to allow the harmonic play to complement what was going on in the section.

Their active involvement allowed me to reduce/focus my volume contribution and it encouraged a more sectional approach to the musical concept. As I told a student recently, there is a reason that there are two and sometimes three trumpet parts, and it was not because it was mandated by the Musician’s Union.

One other thought, are there any trumpet principals with a major symphony that bring their own second player with them? Are there any thoughts regarding how to develop as a second trumpet player?
_________________
John M. Beringer, Jr.
Bach 229 LC (Malone Leadpipe); Bach Bb 180S37; Eastman D/Eb. Bush WX-S Mouthpiece
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
aspeyr1
Regular Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ricetrpt wrote:
This is a really good topic. I'd love to know what leaping second trumpet parts you are referring to (other than Firebird).


Not exactly sure what "leaping" parts means, but there are more than a few pieces where the 2nd trumpet plays rather high and low (just writing composers not piece names);

Bartok
Bruckner
Copland (symphony no. 3 particularly)
Mahler
Resphigi
Shostakovitch
Stravinsky
Vaughan Williams
...ect
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Qnaza
Veteran Member


Joined: 04 Mar 2008
Posts: 271

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dale Proctor wrote:
It's entertaining to see someone who plays 1st parts almost exclusively struggle with a 2nd part because of the way the harmony lines are all over the place.


Totally agree. Different context, but in a similar vein, I usually play second in my local big band but did a gig on fourth one evening when my chops were flat from playing a lot the day before. It was the weirdest experience playing the same rhythms but having to really listen to what I was playing since it was almost all harmony.

If anyone wants to flummox a lead player, give them the last 2 lines of In The Mood, but from the 4th trumpet pad. Now THAT is some serious jumping about and sight reading!
_________________
“Do or do not... there is no try.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Craig Swartz
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 5410
Location: Des Moines, IA area

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aspeyr1 wrote:
Ricetrpt wrote:
This is a really good topic. I'd love to know what leaping second trumpet parts you are referring to (other than Firebird).


Not exactly sure what "leaping" parts means, but there are more than a few pieces where the 2nd trumpet plays rather high and low (just writing composers not piece names);

Bartok
Bruckner
Copland (symphony no. 3 particularly)
Mahler
Resphigi
Shostakovitch
Stravinsky
Vaughan Williams
...ect
I'm sure the reference is due to the parts for orchestra by composers from Haydn though Beethoven and beyond that were written with the natural trumpet in mind. These had only certain partials available so there are times when the second part will jump from a low octave interval to, say, an octave and a fifth higher since it was not possible to play the fifth in the lower octave, making it unison with the first part. (I think there were even a couple of these in Dvorak 7 last weekend but I don't keep track...)

Personally, I always play the ink- it isn't that difficult to make the interval. I'm certain were modern instruments available at the time, the composers would've kept things in octaves but I like to keep things authentic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
connicalman
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 1346
Location: West Medford, MA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In quintet I had the 2nd book. In an early practice the group at times, and especially my part, sounded muddy. Some of the best advice I got here on TH was to "make it shine", and 'let it speak' as regards to the 2nd part. When I no longer played with too much deference to the lead, the entire quintet lit up. A very good, and much appreciated lesson about everyone pulling their weight and not allowing for any shadows.
_________________
kochaavim, csillaagkep, αστερρισμός, konnstelacji, connstellation... ...a.k.a. 28A
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steve A
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 607
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Craig Swartz wrote:

Personally, I always play the ink- it isn't that difficult to make the interval. I'm certain were modern instruments available at the time, the composers would've kept things in octaves but I like to keep things authentic.


Of course, there's no right or wrong answer here, and I'm not meaning to agree or disagree, but just as it relates to the topic of authenticity in 2nd trumpet playing, this article springs to mind:

http://www.thomasstevensmusic.com/quotablesPage.php?Trumpet-Traditions-I-About-Those-Octaves-19
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dale Proctor
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 6878
Location: Heart of Dixie

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

connicalman wrote:
In quintet I had the 2nd book. In an early practice the group at times, and especially my part, sounded muddy. Some of the best advice I got here on TH was to "make it shine", and 'let it speak' as regards to the 2nd part. When I no longer played with too much deference to the lead, the entire quintet lit up. A very good, and much appreciated lesson about everyone pulling their weight and not allowing for any shadows.

Yep, playing 2nd part in a traditional brass quintet is more like playing a second 1st part, if that makes sense. You don't play a lot of harmony lines with the 1st player - you play a lot more exposed lines, just like the 1st player does. You have to play with a "solo" mindset in these situations.
_________________
Olde Towne Brass
www.otbrass.com

Brass Band of Huntsville
www.brassbandofhuntsville.com

"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ricetrpt
Veteran Member


Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 118
Location: Watertown, MA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve- Thanks for the link to Thomas Stevens' article. It's a great read.

For whatever it's worth, when it comes to playing the written unisons as octaves, I think we need to not only consider the capabilities of the natural trumpets, but also the timbre. Anyone who has played a natural trumpet or even listened to them a fair amount knows that they don't have as bright of a sound as the modern trumpets. Two natural trumpets playing in unison wouldn't cut through an orchestra the way two modern horns would. Of course, on our modern trumpets we can just back off the sound for the unisons, but I find it to be less challenging both musically and mechanically to keep the octaves going.

Like Stevens says, there is no right or wrong answer. [/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Craig Swartz
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 5410
Location: Des Moines, IA area

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve A wrote:
Craig Swartz wrote:

Personally, I always play the ink- it isn't that difficult to make the interval. I'm certain were modern instruments available at the time, the composers would've kept things in octaves but I like to keep things authentic.


Of course, there's no right or wrong answer here, and I'm not meaning to agree or disagree, but just as it relates to the topic of authenticity in 2nd trumpet playing, this article springs to mind:

http://www.thomasstevensmusic.com/quotablesPage.php?Trumpet-Traditions-I-About-Those-Octaves-19

I've read the Stevens article. I also listen to a lot of recordings. The vast majority of the recordings I own have tpt playing the ink.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Orchestral/Chamber Music/Solo All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group