• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter?


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Cornet/Flügelhorn
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Venturi
Veteran Member


Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 158

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:15 pm    Post subject: Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter? Reply with quote

Many great cornets have a shepherd's crook, and many cornets don't.

Does the shepherd's crook truly confer improved sound . . . or is it just another variation on the theme? Does it have more visual significance than acoustical significance, or does is really enhance the cornet sound?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nieuwguyski
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 1677
Location: Santa Cruz County, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is absolutely no agreement on this. IMO, all other variables staying the same, the only thing the crook does is shorten the horn, putting the sound closer to your ears and changing the feedback to the player. The player then responds to this different feedback by playing differently, so a short cornet sounds different to the listener.

YOMV (your opinion may vary).
_________________
J. Notso Nieuwguyski
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ConnArtist
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 2719
Location: La-la Land (corner of 13th and 13th)

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The more horns I try, the more convinced I am... that the crook is not at all the important ingredient. Conical bore for sure is, amongst other things (like bell taper, materials, fit and finish, etc.) Many talk of the bell being closer to the player... which certainly affects approach, but from the audience side of the horn, other bell styles can sound great too. It all really comes down to what the cornet player likes to have in their hands to make the sounds they want to make.

Sometimes it seems to me the crook is mostly a conventional look that sheeples expect to see before they will admit the horn sounds great. It would be fun to do a ton of recordings and surprise folks with which cornets they think sound best.

But sure... once tooled up to make fantastic cornets with the same design a factory has used for decades... continuing to use that form is a perfectly valid reason to make excellent playing and sounding cornets that have a shepherd's crook!
_________________
"Stomvi" PhrankenPhlugel w/ Blessing copper bell
1971 Coprion Director cornet
c. 1955? Besson 10-10
c. 1960s? Steenhuysen Flugel
1986 Bach Strad 37 ML
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Comeback
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Jun 2011
Posts: 625
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:55 am    Post subject: Iconoclasm Reply with quote

ConnArtist wrote:
Quote:
It would be fun to do a ton of recordings and surprise folks with which cornets they think sound best.

I am no physicist, but major differences in instrument architecture have an effect on sounds produced. Whether that difference is significant to listeners is subjective, apart from careful testing with appropriate controls and instrumentation. What would really be interesting would be applying ConnArtist's suggestions to Bb trumpets! We work ourselves into a figurative lather over all sorts of subtleties associated with design and build when it comes to Bb trumpets. Would trumpet icons crumble if subjected to such testing?

Venturi's original post subject:
Quote:
Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter?

I have three Bb cornets, two long cornets and one shepherd's crook. None are high-dollar. I enjoy playing each of them. As it happens, the shepherd's crook simply works best for me at this time. And that fact may have little to do with its crook. As previous posters have written, the proximity of the bell to the player improves feedback, which seems to me to have some importance, especially in small venues.

Jim
_________________
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GenoValet
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 1234
Location: Jacksonville FL

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:06 am    Post subject: Re: Iconoclasm Reply with quote

Comeback wrote:

I am no physicist, but major differences in instrument architecture have an effect on sounds produced.
Jim


+1 (by a recovering electrical engineer/patent atty., who did pass the graduate level course in wave guide technology).
_________________
Vada con Dio, gV. 1 Thessalonians 4:16
CDs @
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/GenoValet
http://www.TheTempos.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shofarguy
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Posts: 4653
Location: AZ

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's been my experience that larger radius bends delay the shift to edginess in timbre. I've heard it in flugelhorn and I expect it to be the case in cornet. The more open the wrap, the more energy must be put into the horn to get it to "light up."

Think of the old pea-shooter trumpets and how the tight wrap made them sound and respond. Compare that with a French horn. Yeah I know, apples and tea cups...

Brian
_________________
Flip Oakes Wild Thing Bb Trumpet
Flip Oakes Wild Thing Flugelhorn

There is one reason that I practice: to be ready at the downbeat when the final trumpet sounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChopsGone
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Dec 2008
Posts: 1383

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

With the right mouthpiece and the right approach, I can get a convincing true cornet sound from my Olds Recording and Super Recording cornets. But when playing a cornet with a shepherd's crook, it just seems to come naturally. I can't begin to explain why, but I'm hooked on the shepherd's crook designs.
_________________
Vintage Olds & Reynolds & Selmers galore
Aubertins, Bessons, Calicchios, Courtois, Wild Things, Marcinkiewicz, Ogilbee Thumpet, DeNicola Puje, Kanstuls....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
etc-etc
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 3996

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The crook is a throwback to the Stoelzel valve cornopeans that had the bell connected to the bottom of the valve. The effects range from changing the player's posture to collection of spit at crook's bottom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RandyTX
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Posts: 2747
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know this may be a bit of sacrilege, but I think it's 95% mouthpiece, and 5% or less in the wrap.

I suspect if we took two equal quality cornets, one "long", one shepherd's crook, and had the same player record on both cornets, using the same mouthpiece, many, if not all of you, would have a very hard time telling which cornet was being used.

That said, cornets are cool, and come in an almost infinite variety of wraps, all of them more interesting than a trumpet, so you can't have too many.

P.S. I think the whole "conical bore" argument has been overused for half a century or more. The truth is in a lot of modern instruments, trumpets are more conical than some cornets, and neither are all that conical anyway. But, it makes a great story when trying to explain what a cornet is to somebody that doesn't know. Only problem is, it's quite often not true.

http://robbstewart.com/Essays/Trumpet_Schmumpet_abridged.htm

http://robbstewart.com/Essays/TrumpetSchmumpet.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tommy t.
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 01 Mar 2002
Posts: 2155
Location: Big Thicket, Deep East Texas

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RandyTX wrote:
I know this may be a bit of sacrilege, but I think it's 95% mouthpiece, and 5% or less in the wrap.


"...5% or less..."

I don't believe that the little jog in a shepherd's crook makes any difference at all.

Anybody that wants to convence me of the contrary will have to explain why a Conn 80A with an opera glass tuning slide sitting there is still just a good cornet, neither improved or ruined by two 90 degree and one 180 degree kinks at that spot.

(By the way, anybody making another post in this thread without reading the full version of the Stewart article, and its detailed comparison chart, as linked in by RandyTX, is running the risk of appearing uninformed. I can well imagine someone who has not read that information saying something like "the shape of a cornet is more important than the shape of a trumpet because the cornet is more conical." I cannot imagine someone making that statement after studying Stewart's chart.)

Tommy T.
_________________
Actually, I hate music. I just do this for the money.


Last edited by tommy t. on Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
loudog
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 23 Nov 2001
Posts: 1144
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RandyTX wrote:
I know this may be a bit of sacrilege, but I think it's 95% mouthpiece, and 5% or less in the wrap.

I suspect if we took two equal quality cornets, one "long", one shepherd's crook, and had the same player record on both cornets, using the same mouthpiece, many, if not all of you, would have a very hard time telling which cornet was being used.

That said, cornets are cool, and come in an almost infinite variety of wraps, all of them more interesting than a trumpet, so you can't have too many.

P.S. I think the whole "conical bore" argument has been overused for half a century or more. The truth is in a lot of modern instruments, trumpets are more conical than some cornets, and neither are all that conical anyway. But, it makes a great story when trying to explain what a cornet is to somebody that doesn't know. Only problem is, it's quite often not true.

http://robbstewart.com/Essays/Trumpet_Schmumpet_abridged.htm

http://robbstewart.com/Essays/TrumpetSchmumpet.html


Randy I think you're right on here.

And to build on what you said...I think that our own internal sound concept has more to do with it than anything else. If you let the horn dictate what you sound like, then there are other problems. The horn helps, for sure, and has certain tendencies, but ultimately you will sound the way you will sound. That's why I'm a crappy cornet player...I sound too trumpety on it.
_________________
Louie Eckhardt, MM
Doctor of Musical Arts student, Louisiana State University
Freelance Trumpeter
http://www.LouieEckhardt.com
Monroe Symphony Orchestra
http://www.monroesymphonyorchestra.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lmf
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 2155
Location: Indiana USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do shepherd's crook model cornets sound different than long model cornets? Some say the sound is different while others say it is not. We are told that the choice of mouthpiece makes a difference in sound. Others say that the player who has developed the ability to play with a "rich" sound will continue to play that way no matter what type of cornet they choose to play. Could it be that sound is "subjective" when comparing long model and shepherd's crook cornets?

I enjoy playing my Conn 28A/38A Connstellation Long Model cornet. It plays wondefully, but to me it sounds more brilliant when using a cup mouthpiece. I've noticed that when I use a DW cornet mouthpiece the Conn sounds more mellow. I use a Bach 12C or Bach 7C.

I enjoy playing my Blessing Artist 141S Shepherd's Crook Cornet. I like the sound it makes which appears more "mellow." I use DW 3, 4, 4B mouthpieces when playing the Blessing Artist Short model cornet with shepherd's crook. However, if one plays this cornet with a cup mouthpiece the sound may appear more brilliant. I play it with DW mouthpieces because the sound projected seems more "cornet-like" to my ears. It may be a subjective thing. I admit that I enjoy playing the shepherd's crook cornet more.

Best wishes,

Lloyd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dale Proctor
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 6919
Location: Heart of Dixie

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter? Reply with quote

Venturi wrote:
...Does the shepherd's crook truly confer improved sound?...
It does if you think so.

Actually, when speaking of higher-end cornets, the manufacturers build their more mellow cornets with a shepherds crook bell. I'm positive they could achieve the same result in tone with an American-wrap cornet, but we expect a mellow cornet to look the part.
_________________
Olde Towne Brass
www.otbrass.com

Brass Band of Huntsville
www.brassbandofhuntsville.com

"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
harleyt26
Regular Member


Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Posts: 60
Location: Summerfield, Fl.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The shepherds crook is a traditional look for a cornets design but there cornets without the crook that sound as good as those with one. My Conn 36A Concert Grand has as dark and mellow a cornet tone as any cornet I have heard.
I have two shepherds crook cornets that sound great but not better than the 36A.
I don't have a short cornet like the ones Mr. Proctor has so I cannot compare them.
So in my opinion the crook has less to do with the sound than other factors in the design of a cornet.

Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dale Proctor
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 6919
Location: Heart of Dixie

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

etc-etc wrote:
The crook is a throwback to the Stoelzel valve cornopeans that had the bell connected to the bottom of the valve...

Or, it could be a throwback to the arrangement for a rotary valve cornet.


_________________
Olde Towne Brass
www.otbrass.com

Brass Band of Huntsville
www.brassbandofhuntsville.com

"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jazz_trpt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 25 Nov 2001
Posts: 5279
Location: Champaign, Illinois, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the shepherd's crook because it brings the bell closer to me. It also thus contributes to a little more compact balance of the horn.

The tone of the horn is most affected by the bell flare, not the wrap per se, tho the flare is often part of the wrap.

The differences between various horns are too great to try to attribute a significant change in sound/response to a single design component of one horn, IMO.
_________________
Jeff Helgesen
Free jazz solo transcriptions! :: Jazz Mayhem CD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
roynj
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 19 Oct 2002
Posts: 1588

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What opened my eyes (ears) to the sound quality of a cornet was when I had the chance to experiment with various different lead pipes as offered by Smith Watson on their Soloist cornet. Man the lead pipe is what controls the sound of the thing, for sure. So I would say that the sound character of any given cornet is mainly in the front end (mouthpiece and leadpipe) and less on the bell end. However, the point made earlier about the fact that the bell is closer to the player's ears does "matter" to the player. I happen to prefer the shepards crook style cornets for this very reason. I believe that brass historians will say that the bell crook was to shorten the horn to allow players to sit closer to the music stands, which is needed if one is playing with a band on a small stage. But as for sound difference, I would defy anyone to pass a blind test of identical horns (one with crook, one without). I'm guessing it's a 50/50 proposition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Crazy Finn
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 27 Dec 2001
Posts: 4413
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter? Reply with quote

Dale Proctor wrote:
Venturi wrote:
...Does the shepherd's crook truly confer improved sound?...
It does if you think so.

Actually, when speaking of higher-end cornets, the manufacturers build their more mellow cornets with a shepherds crook bell. I'm positive they could achieve the same result in tone with an American-wrap cornet, but we expect a mellow cornet to look the part.


Yeah.

I think the shepard's crook is also an indicator of how it's designed than merely a feature itself.

Most of the "short" cornet's I've played are more mellow than the long ones I have. While it's possible that the bell is responsible for some of it (wider radius as Brian said?) it's very likely that all those typical design and playing elements are making a difference - mouthpiece, leadpipe, tuning slide, bore etc.

That said, there is one exception I've run into that I think Dale mentioned once before. I played a student Yamaha shepard's crook (2330?) once. I also own a Yamaha student long model 2310 - it the horn I started on. The long model is more mellow and "short cornet-like" than the short model.

If there is a long and short model cornet that is identical except for the bell crook, that would be interesting to see and hear.
_________________
LA Benge 3X Bb Trumpet
Selmer Radial Bb Trumpet
Yamaha 6335S Bb Trumpet
Besson 709 Bb Trumpet
Olds Ambassador Bb Trumpet
Bach 184L Bb Cornet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jon_norstog
Regular Member


Joined: 07 Feb 2012
Posts: 98
Location: Pokatello, Idaho

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like a crookie. I like the way they balance, for one thing. I've got a few cornets and how they sound depends on how I blow them. That said, I think the companies that made crookies were going for a certain sound. And I think that sound was different from what the American cornet makers were after. At least by the 1920's.

jn
_________________
toot, toot!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tom K.
Veteran Member


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 462

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crooks matter!

and,

I am not a crook!

and,

Too many crooks spoil the soup!
_________________
"At the round earth's imagined corners, blow
Your trumpets, angels" -John Donne

40s Conn 22B
50s Olds Ambassador
60s Conn Director
70s Yamaha 738
80s King 650 flugel
90s Bach 184 cornet
00s Bach 72*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Cornet/Flügelhorn All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group