| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Venturi Veteran Member

Joined: 02 Apr 2012 Posts: 140
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:15 pm Post subject: Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter? |
|
|
Many great cornets have a shepherd's crook, and many cornets don't.
Does the shepherd's crook truly confer improved sound . . . or is it just another variation on the theme? Does it have more visual significance than acoustical significance, or does is really enhance the cornet sound? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nieuwguyski Heavyweight Member

Joined: 06 Feb 2002 Posts: 1676 Location: Santa Cruz County, CA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is absolutely no agreement on this. IMO, all other variables staying the same, the only thing the crook does is shorten the horn, putting the sound closer to your ears and changing the feedback to the player. The player then responds to this different feedback by playing differently, so a short cornet sounds different to the listener.
YOMV (your opinion may vary). _________________ J. Notso Nieuwguyski |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ConnArtist Heavyweight Member

Joined: 20 Mar 2008 Posts: 2719 Location: La-la Land (corner of 13th and 13th)
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
The more horns I try, the more convinced I am... that the crook is not at all the important ingredient. Conical bore for sure is, amongst other things (like bell taper, materials, fit and finish, etc.) Many talk of the bell being closer to the player... which certainly affects approach, but from the audience side of the horn, other bell styles can sound great too. It all really comes down to what the cornet player likes to have in their hands to make the sounds they want to make.
Sometimes it seems to me the crook is mostly a conventional look that sheeples expect to see before they will admit the horn sounds great. It would be fun to do a ton of recordings and surprise folks with which cornets they think sound best.
But sure... once tooled up to make fantastic cornets with the same design a factory has used for decades... continuing to use that form is a perfectly valid reason to make excellent playing and sounding cornets that have a shepherd's crook!  _________________ "Stomvi" PhrankenPhlugel w/ Blessing copper bell
1971 Coprion Director cornet
c. 1955? Besson 10-10
c. 1960s? Steenhuysen Flugel
1986 Bach Strad 37 ML |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Comeback Heavyweight Member

Joined: 22 Jun 2011 Posts: 605 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:55 am Post subject: Iconoclasm |
|
|
ConnArtist wrote:
| Quote: | | It would be fun to do a ton of recordings and surprise folks with which cornets they think sound best. |
I am no physicist, but major differences in instrument architecture have an effect on sounds produced. Whether that difference is significant to listeners is subjective, apart from careful testing with appropriate controls and instrumentation. What would really be interesting would be applying ConnArtist's suggestions to Bb trumpets! We work ourselves into a figurative lather over all sorts of subtleties associated with design and build when it comes to Bb trumpets. Would trumpet icons crumble if subjected to such testing?
Venturi's original post subject:
| Quote: | | Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter? |
I have three Bb cornets, two long cornets and one shepherd's crook. None are high-dollar. I enjoy playing each of them. As it happens, the shepherd's crook simply works best for me at this time. And that fact may have little to do with its crook. As previous posters have written, the proximity of the bell to the player improves feedback, which seems to me to have some importance, especially in small venues.
Jim _________________ Bb Trumpets: 2000 Bach Stradivarius 180S37, 1972 Getzen Eterna Severinsen
Bb Cornet: 2008 Blessing XL-CR Shepherd's Crook
Flugelhorn: 1990 Blessing Artist |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GenoValet Heavyweight Member

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 1234 Location: Jacksonville FL
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:06 am Post subject: Re: Iconoclasm |
|
|
| Comeback wrote: |
I am no physicist, but major differences in instrument architecture have an effect on sounds produced.
Jim |
+1 (by a recovering electrical engineer/patent atty., who did pass the graduate level course in wave guide technology).  _________________ Vada con Dio, gV. 1 Thessalonians 4:16
CDs @
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/GenoValet
http://www.TheTempos.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shofarguy Heavyweight Member

Joined: 18 Sep 2007 Posts: 4628 Location: AZ
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's been my experience that larger radius bends delay the shift to edginess in timbre. I've heard it in flugelhorn and I expect it to be the case in cornet. The more open the wrap, the more energy must be put into the horn to get it to "light up."
Think of the old pea-shooter trumpets and how the tight wrap made them sound and respond. Compare that with a French horn. Yeah I know, apples and tea cups...
Brian _________________ Flip Oakes Wild Thing Bb Trumpet
Flip Oakes Wild Thing Flugelhorn
There is one reason that I practice: to be ready at the downbeat when the final trumpet sounds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChopsGone Heavyweight Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2008 Posts: 1377
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
With the right mouthpiece and the right approach, I can get a convincing true cornet sound from my Olds Recording and Super Recording cornets. But when playing a cornet with a shepherd's crook, it just seems to come naturally. I can't begin to explain why, but I'm hooked on the shepherd's crook designs. _________________ Vintage Olds & Reynolds & Selmers galore
Aubertins, Bessons, Calicchios, Courtois, Wild Things, Marcinkiewicz, Ogilbee Thumpet, DeNicola Puje, Kanstuls.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
etc-etc Heavyweight Member
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 3961
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The crook is a throwback to the Stoelzel valve cornopeans that had the bell connected to the bottom of the valve. The effects range from changing the player's posture to collection of spit at crook's bottom.
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RandyTX Heavyweight Member

Joined: 25 Mar 2010 Posts: 2734 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know this may be a bit of sacrilege, but I think it's 95% mouthpiece, and 5% or less in the wrap.
I suspect if we took two equal quality cornets, one "long", one shepherd's crook, and had the same player record on both cornets, using the same mouthpiece, many, if not all of you, would have a very hard time telling which cornet was being used.
That said, cornets are cool, and come in an almost infinite variety of wraps, all of them more interesting than a trumpet, so you can't have too many.
P.S. I think the whole "conical bore" argument has been overused for half a century or more. The truth is in a lot of modern instruments, trumpets are more conical than some cornets, and neither are all that conical anyway. But, it makes a great story when trying to explain what a cornet is to somebody that doesn't know. Only problem is, it's quite often not true.
http://robbstewart.com/Essays/Trumpet_Schmumpet_abridged.htm
http://robbstewart.com/Essays/TrumpetSchmumpet.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tommy t. Heavyweight Member

Joined: 01 Mar 2002 Posts: 2136 Location: Big Thicket, Deep East Texas
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RandyTX wrote: | | I know this may be a bit of sacrilege, but I think it's 95% mouthpiece, and 5% or less in the wrap.
|
"...5% or less..."
I don't believe that the little jog in a shepherd's crook makes any difference at all.
Anybody that wants to convence me of the contrary will have to explain why a Conn 80A with an opera glass tuning slide sitting there is still just a good cornet, neither improved or ruined by two 90 degree and one 180 degree kinks at that spot.
(By the way, anybody making another post in this thread without reading the full version of the Stewart article, and its detailed comparison chart, as linked in by RandyTX, is running the risk of appearing uninformed. I can well imagine someone who has not read that information saying something like "the shape of a cornet is more important than the shape of a trumpet because the cornet is more conical." I cannot imagine someone making that statement after studying Stewart's chart.)
Tommy T. _________________ Actually, I hate music. I just do this for the money.
Last edited by tommy t. on Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loudog Heavyweight Member
Joined: 23 Nov 2001 Posts: 1119 Location: Baton Rouge, LA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RandyTX wrote: | I know this may be a bit of sacrilege, but I think it's 95% mouthpiece, and 5% or less in the wrap.
I suspect if we took two equal quality cornets, one "long", one shepherd's crook, and had the same player record on both cornets, using the same mouthpiece, many, if not all of you, would have a very hard time telling which cornet was being used.
That said, cornets are cool, and come in an almost infinite variety of wraps, all of them more interesting than a trumpet, so you can't have too many.
P.S. I think the whole "conical bore" argument has been overused for half a century or more. The truth is in a lot of modern instruments, trumpets are more conical than some cornets, and neither are all that conical anyway. But, it makes a great story when trying to explain what a cornet is to somebody that doesn't know. Only problem is, it's quite often not true.
http://robbstewart.com/Essays/Trumpet_Schmumpet_abridged.htm
http://robbstewart.com/Essays/TrumpetSchmumpet.html |
Randy I think you're right on here.
And to build on what you said...I think that our own internal sound concept has more to do with it than anything else. If you let the horn dictate what you sound like, then there are other problems. The horn helps, for sure, and has certain tendencies, but ultimately you will sound the way you will sound. That's why I'm a crappy cornet player...I sound too trumpety on it. _________________ Louie Eckhardt, MM
Doctor of Musical Arts student, Louisiana State University
Freelance Trumpeter
http://www.LouieEckhardt.com
Monroe Symphony Orchestra
http://www.monroesymphonyorchestra.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lmf Heavyweight Member
Joined: 20 May 2007 Posts: 2155 Location: Indiana USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do shepherd's crook model cornets sound different than long model cornets? Some say the sound is different while others say it is not. We are told that the choice of mouthpiece makes a difference in sound. Others say that the player who has developed the ability to play with a "rich" sound will continue to play that way no matter what type of cornet they choose to play. Could it be that sound is "subjective" when comparing long model and shepherd's crook cornets?
I enjoy playing my Conn 28A/38A Connstellation Long Model cornet. It plays wondefully, but to me it sounds more brilliant when using a cup mouthpiece. I've noticed that when I use a DW cornet mouthpiece the Conn sounds more mellow. I use a Bach 12C or Bach 7C.
I enjoy playing my Blessing Artist 141S Shepherd's Crook Cornet. I like the sound it makes which appears more "mellow." I use DW 3, 4, 4B mouthpieces when playing the Blessing Artist Short model cornet with shepherd's crook. However, if one plays this cornet with a cup mouthpiece the sound may appear more brilliant. I play it with DW mouthpieces because the sound projected seems more "cornet-like" to my ears. It may be a subjective thing. I admit that I enjoy playing the shepherd's crook cornet more.
Best wishes,
Lloyd |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dale Proctor Heavyweight Member

Joined: 26 May 2005 Posts: 6891 Location: Heart of Dixie
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:55 pm Post subject: Re: Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter? |
|
|
| Venturi wrote: | | ...Does the shepherd's crook truly confer improved sound?... | It does if you think so.
Actually, when speaking of higher-end cornets, the manufacturers build their more mellow cornets with a shepherds crook bell. I'm positive they could achieve the same result in tone with an American-wrap cornet, but we expect a mellow cornet to look the part. _________________ Olde Towne Brass
www.otbrass.com
Brass Band of Huntsville
www.brassbandofhuntsville.com
"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
harleyt26 Regular Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2011 Posts: 53 Location: Summerfield, Fl.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
The shepherds crook is a traditional look for a cornets design but there cornets without the crook that sound as good as those with one. My Conn 36A Concert Grand has as dark and mellow a cornet tone as any cornet I have heard.
I have two shepherds crook cornets that sound great but not better than the 36A.
I don't have a short cornet like the ones Mr. Proctor has so I cannot compare them.
So in my opinion the crook has less to do with the sound than other factors in the design of a cornet.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dale Proctor Heavyweight Member

Joined: 26 May 2005 Posts: 6891 Location: Heart of Dixie
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| etc-etc wrote: | | The crook is a throwback to the Stoelzel valve cornopeans that had the bell connected to the bottom of the valve... |
Or, it could be a throwback to the arrangement for a rotary valve cornet.
 _________________ Olde Towne Brass
www.otbrass.com
Brass Band of Huntsville
www.brassbandofhuntsville.com
"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jazz_trpt Heavyweight Member

Joined: 25 Nov 2001 Posts: 5260 Location: Champaign, Illinois, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like the shepherd's crook because it brings the bell closer to me. It also thus contributes to a little more compact balance of the horn.
The tone of the horn is most affected by the bell flare, not the wrap per se, tho the flare is often part of the wrap.
The differences between various horns are too great to try to attribute a significant change in sound/response to a single design component of one horn, IMO. _________________ Jeff Helgesen
Free jazz solo transcriptions! :: Jazz Mayhem CD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
roynj Heavyweight Member
Joined: 19 Oct 2002 Posts: 1583
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What opened my eyes (ears) to the sound quality of a cornet was when I had the chance to experiment with various different lead pipes as offered by Smith Watson on their Soloist cornet. Man the lead pipe is what controls the sound of the thing, for sure. So I would say that the sound character of any given cornet is mainly in the front end (mouthpiece and leadpipe) and less on the bell end. However, the point made earlier about the fact that the bell is closer to the player's ears does "matter" to the player. I happen to prefer the shepards crook style cornets for this very reason. I believe that brass historians will say that the bell crook was to shorten the horn to allow players to sit closer to the music stands, which is needed if one is playing with a band on a small stage. But as for sound difference, I would defy anyone to pass a blind test of identical horns (one with crook, one without). I'm guessing it's a 50/50 proposition. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crazy Finn Heavyweight Member

Joined: 27 Dec 2001 Posts: 4354 Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:14 pm Post subject: Re: Does a shepherd's crook REALLY matter? |
|
|
| Dale Proctor wrote: | | Venturi wrote: | | ...Does the shepherd's crook truly confer improved sound?... | It does if you think so.
Actually, when speaking of higher-end cornets, the manufacturers build their more mellow cornets with a shepherds crook bell. I'm positive they could achieve the same result in tone with an American-wrap cornet, but we expect a mellow cornet to look the part. |
Yeah.
I think the shepard's crook is also an indicator of how it's designed than merely a feature itself.
Most of the "short" cornet's I've played are more mellow than the long ones I have. While it's possible that the bell is responsible for some of it (wider radius as Brian said?) it's very likely that all those typical design and playing elements are making a difference - mouthpiece, leadpipe, tuning slide, bore etc.
That said, there is one exception I've run into that I think Dale mentioned once before. I played a student Yamaha shepard's crook (2330?) once. I also own a Yamaha student long model 2310 - it the horn I started on. The long model is more mellow and "short cornet-like" than the short model.
If there is a long and short model cornet that is identical except for the bell crook, that would be interesting to see and hear. _________________ LA Benge 3X Bb Trumpet
Selmer Radial Bb Trumpet
Yamaha 6335S Bb Trumpet
Besson 709 Bb Trumpet
Olds Ambassador Bb Trumpet
Bach 184L Bb Cornet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jon_norstog Regular Member
Joined: 07 Feb 2012 Posts: 92 Location: Pokatello, Idaho
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like a crookie. I like the way they balance, for one thing. I've got a few cornets and how they sound depends on how I blow them. That said, I think the companies that made crookies were going for a certain sound. And I think that sound was different from what the American cornet makers were after. At least by the 1920's.
jn _________________ toot, toot! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom K. Veteran Member
Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 462
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Crooks matter!
and,
I am not a crook!
and,
Too many crooks spoil the soup! _________________ "At the round earth's imagined corners, blow
Your trumpets, angels" -John Donne
40s Conn 22B
50s Olds Ambassador
60s Conn Director
70s Yamaha 738
80s King 650 flugel
90s Bach 184 cornet
00s Bach 72* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|