• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

New trumpet Maker, Jérôme Wiss


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
stumac
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Posts: 697
Location: Flinders, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2016 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For those interested look at US Patent 4,515,061 the late Ernest Ferron of Rouen describes a tuning slide bow as Mr Wiss is surely aware of.

In the mid 1980s Ferron supervised the manufacture of a batch of 10 C trumpets at Selmer based on the C700 platform with his modifications, I believe they turned out too costly to manufacture so they were not further developed.

I have one of these and except for the low C# it is the most in tune of any instrument I have played. I applaud Mr Wiss for his efforts.

Regards, Stuart.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
marnix
Veteran Member


Joined: 16 Feb 2014
Posts: 212

PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jerome,


If you can tell me where you are located, I would be very willing to visit your shop, and play your trumpets.
I do not understand physics and so, but I am a professional player, who makes a good living of it. I think a play test will be very interesting, also for the Americans here, who are as interested as I am...

I'm from Holland, and it so happens that I own a real nice French car ( a Citroen, the BEST!!!), so for me it's also a very good reason to drive some miles with it.

And if you know a good camping in the neighbourhood, I can take my wife and little girl on a short vacation?

How about that?

You can mail me if think this is a good plan. costermarnix @ gmail.com
_________________
Olds Recording '66
Stomvi Mahler Titan.
XO brass C trumpet
XO brass picc
Yamaha 741 D
Back to good old GR 66L
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sustained note
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 643
Location: Givat Shmuel, Israel

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Contact details including address:

http://jeromewiss.com/en/contact/
_________________
Michael Greenberg

Giv'at Shmuel
Israel

Trumpet: Schilke B1 (2005)
Mouthpiece: Schilke Soloiste MG1
(Marc Geujon) gold plated
----------------

Keep a sense of humor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chuck in ny
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 3597
Location: New York

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bit of an over focus here on the tuning aspect as it's an issue that gets resolved by the player one way or the other. physics is fine in its place. sound, feel, and response are where the rubber meets the road.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
James Becker
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2827
Location: Littleton, MA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indeed Chuck. I've asked several world class brass players in what order is most important, feel, sound or pitch. No doubt an instrument must produce the right sound with an acceptable scale, however if it doesn't feel right then the rest pales in comparison.

My 2 cents
_________________
James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com

Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
ruotjoh
Veteran Member


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 115
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chuck in ny wrote:
bit of an over focus here on the tuning aspect as it's an issue that gets resolved by the player one way or the other. physics is fine in its place. sound, feel, and response are where the rubber meets the road.


True, but this is because the manufacturer himself said that "The complete trumpet is equal-tempered from the low F# to the high C" and "...with some tricks on the bore, you can have every note perfectly in tune without any tuning slide."

I understand that tuning may be improved but it would be proper to say that the intonation is excellent rather than 150 hours behind computer can result equal-tempered instrument with perfect pitch from note to note.

Ok, I'm done with this topic. I hope all the best to mr. Wiss and his business.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lipshurt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 2642
Location: vista ca

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wow, i just this whole thing.....and once again i'm disappointed in quite a few folks on here that think they know more than they actually do, and then they challenge someone who just knows so much more...it embarrassing to watch (read).

THANK YOU to Mr. Wiss for doing what you are doing, continuing the work of dr. Cardwell, E.L. Kent and others. Very exciting.

I have Made many lead pipes, mouthpieces, backbones and even a whole valve assembly form scratch using many of the ideas form Cardwell, Kent etc. And i have a question for you:

I understand how the bore and conical sections affect the nodal points and that adjustments can raise or lower certain notes on the instrument. My question is how much these nodal points are moved when the main tuning slide is moved in or out. If you move the main slide 3cm (one inch or so) because of temperature or to accommodate a certain extra deep or extra shallow mouthpiece....does that make all of the bore adjustments slightly in the wrong locations? It is fairly common to move the slide quite a bit for time to time.

Than you for considering the question.
Keep going with your efforts

Doug Meeuwsen
_________________
Mouthpiece Maker
vintage Trumpet design enthusiast
www.meeuwsenmouthpieces.com
www.youtube.com/lipshurt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
marnix
Veteran Member


Joined: 16 Feb 2014
Posts: 212

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lipshurt wrote:
wow, i just this whole thing.....and once again i'm disappointed in quite a few folks on here that think they know more than they actually do, and then they challenge someone who just knows so much more...it embarrassing to watch (read).



Doug Meeuwsen


And this is the reason why I'm trying to arrange a meeting with Jerome, to playtest his instruments.
Because it looks like lots of fun, France is a great country with lots of excellent wines and cheeses, and perhaps a trumpetmaker, who really changes the way we always play the trumpet.

I don't know anything about physics, or mathematics. But I know about trumpetplaying.
As Gary Radke says: we do the math, you make the music.

If Jerome has made a remarkable new instrument, it's a cool thing to be there, and try it, isn't it?

I will post my findings of course here in this topic.
_________________
Olds Recording '66
Stomvi Mahler Titan.
XO brass C trumpet
XO brass picc
Yamaha 741 D
Back to good old GR 66L
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sustained note
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 643
Location: Givat Shmuel, Israel

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 7:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The new Jerome Wiss trumpet with the "normal" bell. I think it's a beauty:

http://jeromewiss.com/fr/fabrication/trompette-sib-modele-916/
_________________
Michael Greenberg

Giv'at Shmuel
Israel

Trumpet: Schilke B1 (2005)
Mouthpiece: Schilke Soloiste MG1
(Marc Geujon) gold plated
----------------

Keep a sense of humor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheiden
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 8911
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here a link for the page in English.
http://jeromewiss.com/en/fabrication-en/bb-trumpet-mod-916/

Looks cool. Thanks for sharing.
_________________
"I'm an engineer, which means I think I know a whole bunch of stuff I really don't."
Charles J Heiden/So Cal
Bach Strad 180ML43*/43 Bb/Yamaha 731 Flugel/Benge 1X C/Kanstul 920 Picc/Conn 80A Cornet
Bach 3C rim on 1.5C underpart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dstdenis
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 25 May 2013
Posts: 2123
Location: Atlanta GA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it looks great. I can't imagine how Mr Wiss came up with the idea for that new valve system. I'm very interested to read reports from folks who play-test it for sound and playability.
_________________
Bb Yamaha Xeno 8335IIS
Cornet Getzen Custom 3850S
Flugelhorn Courtois 155R
Piccolo Stomvi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dale Proctor
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 9343
Location: Heart of Dixie

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like Conn may have tried something similar over 100 years ago, but without seeing the valves themselves, it's hard to tell.

http://cderksen.home.xs4all.nl/ConnPerfConnqueror1907image.html
_________________
"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
etc-etc
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 6177

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dale,

I believe in that Conn valve ports are still standard - just the connections between are unusual.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trompette229
Veteran Member


Joined: 21 Mar 2016
Posts: 203

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's great to see someone stepping outside the box, best to you. I may have missed this in the many posts but the one area that seems like a challenge is the lack of 1st and 3rd slide adjustments and/or another way to adjust pitch overall while playing. No matter how well in tune the instrument is, we always have to adjust as we play in the orchestra... playing in different keys (just intonation).

For example: an "E" on a C major triad needs to be 14 cents low while an "E" in a C# minor triad needs to be 16 cents high. Thats a 30 cent pitch differential. Without some way to adjust pitch there would be a lot of pitch bending which is never good for sound quality. While modern trumpets don't completely solve these problems, there is at least help with the slides. Has this already been addressed? If so my apologies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LittleRusty
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 12656
Location: Gardena, Ca

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

trompette229 wrote:
It's great to see someone stepping outside the box, best to you. I may have missed this in the many posts but the one area that seems like a challenge is the lack of 1st and 3rd slide adjustments and/or another way to adjust pitch overall while playing. No matter how well in tune the instrument is, we always have to adjust as we play in the orchestra... playing in different keys (just intonation).

For example: an "E" on a C major triad needs to be 14 cents low while an "E" in a C# minor triad needs to be 16 cents high. Thats a 30 cent pitch differential. Without some way to adjust pitch there would be a lot of pitch bending which is never good for sound quality. While modern trumpets don't completely solve these problems, there is at least help with the slides. Has this already been addressed? If so my apologies.

IMHO, it was asked, but in another way. I think the way you phrase your question couches a better way to discuss tuning aids.

It is not just valve combinations that result in mathematically incorrect lengths for proper tuning, but also the need to adjust within the chord that require tuning aids.

I believe Jerome indicated he could add them. Also one could just make a main slide to handle all the adjustments that we normally use the first and third valve slide for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rod Haney
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 937

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Winghorn wrote:
No computer can come up with a workable solution that violates the laws of physics and accoustics. I assume your computer has found a better way to average the slide lengths so intonation problems are less noticable and easier to lip in tune. Great. But I would rather "lip" less and use tuning aids for a better sound and less embouchure fatigue.

If I am wrong about your intonation solution, please correct me with a scientific explanation, rather than just anecdotal evidence gathered from players I do not know. Thank you.

Steve

Please Steve, the following is not specific to your comment, but a comment on the way people react to change in general.

No computer analysis does not allow a way to violate the laws of Physics and Accoustics, but it does continually prove that old concepts and laws are not always correct and never written in stone. Without modern computational analysis makers cannot possibly try the myriad combinations for new concepts with any chance of doing so without GREAT cost. The work done with trumpet design to date is almost nil with regard to applying modern science, measurement devices, and ground breaking designs. I understand why, it is expensive, time consuming, with almost no monetary reward, and you will be beaten like a red headed stepchild when you try to introduce it. I am a lover of older well made instruments and feel with a very few exceptions horns are not made or assembled with the same craftsmanship as earlier horns. I was schooled not to use slides and have never felt a need nor has it been mentioned its needed, but I can tell a large difference in playing horns that are well in tune with themselves and those that are not and only buy horns that minimize these issues. I believe that for the current designs used this is greatly achieved by craftsmanship and quality assembly, how long has it been since you saw a known maker introduce anything but a refinement of something already done? Wouldn't it be wonderful if this guy had an iea that took even 50% of the variability in intonation out by a simple design change. Maybe his claim of no intonation issues is exaggerated and only reduces issues by 75% or even 30%. Do any of us play so well and have such finely judged hand ear coordination that you would rather use a slide???? What if he reduces intonation variation it by 80% and you are off by 10 cents which is within hearing for most??
{ .10 x .20 (80% reduction) = .02 - 2 cents or a reduction to the point no one could hear a difference } even if he reduced by 50% then you are only talking about 5 cents - I have almost perfect pitch and this is stretching my hearing. Until God starts marketing a trumpet (and I think he will only make one) I think this forum and every trumpet player in the world should encourage this guy and keep an open mind till you play it and form your own conclusions. And even then they are only your conclusions.

I applaud this guy and if I ever have a chance I will play his horn and see. Until that time I personally encourage him and look forward to his horns becoming available in the US (with a trumpet bell haha).

I don't mean to offend anyone on the list and my above comments are not related to a specific post or posts on the topic here, but a general tone that forums of 'experts' generally take (I am heavily involved in automotive engine tuning forums). I'm just a guy who wants all the help he can get from any quarter at any time to help tame this beast called trumpet and want everyone to be encouraging.
Thanks,
Rod
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
scottfsmith
Veteran Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Posts: 474
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The perturbation of the bore in spots to improve intonation has been practiced for hundreds of years in wind instrument design; the old makers didn't understand why but they knew it worked and improved designs by a evolutionary process of trial and error experimentation. In the 1970's scientists started to figure out the basis of these old practices. Here is one such article from Nature:

http://la.trompette.free.fr/Smith/Nature/intonation.htm

This article shows how one of the trumpet partials can be corrected by putting a constriction in the proper spot. It is a very difficult problem to solve all intonation problems (plus keep the pitch stable while you are getting it more in tune), but in a computer simulation you can try hundreds of thousands of options.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rod Haney
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 937

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

QUOTE
I agree with you, that is a big factor why large suppliers rarely make radical changes but what I meant is that manufacturers do make prototypes and try new innovations even though they wouldn't reach in the production line (I know, maybe Bach wasn't the best example).

The reason why non of the masters have come with a design that plays perfectly in tune is simpe: Harmonic series of a trumpet forces some notes to be sharp or flat. These tendencies are dictated by the laws of physics and not the horn itself. I don't understand how it would be possible to build something that changes the fact that trumpet plays naturally out of tune.[/quote

Don't you mean "that trumpet players play naturally out of tune" ? Ha
I always thought if you blew the horn correctly and had a good ear you stayed in tune with all but horrible horns ( insert hated brand here ). But I'm rather simplistic. And try to use the same approach in life because I play trumpet and don't need more complications.
Rod
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
homebilly
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Posts: 2196
Location: Venice, CA & Paris, France

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well folks I played both horns, actually the first person to play the standard bell version, yesterday and all I can say is BRAVO to Jérôme.

I loved the radical flared bell version!!!
I took some pictures that I'll post when I get a chance.

my thoughts on the radical bell original version:

• the build quality is superbe and the look is crazy cool.
• different feel in your hands but very balanced and easy to hold.
• easy to confuse as a C trumpet
• it takes a while to get used to its way of playing as it is very, very open which I absolutely dug.
• it has an adjustable gap receiver that allows for some added resistance.
• it sounds very diffused and fluffy but that can be altered by the gap thingy
• it vibrates in your hand just like my broken braced Ambassadors do
• it has no spit valves but those can be added if needed. I like it as is.
• it has no triggers but those too could be added I suppose if one insisted
• valve block and valves are excellent. some of the best that I have played.
• the bell had a small rise built into it. it didnt bother me but a Lee Morgan style valve presser might have trouble getting the valves all of the way down but then again a Lee style presser might want just that!

the intonation is very close to as advertised.as with any new instrument i would need a few days or weeks of playing it to really know if it plays 100% in tune. also I change horns alot and play a very, very deep V piece, which is very slippery, so my base reference isn't so solid these days.

but the horn DOES play nicely in tune with itself. 100% in tune? you'll have to make an effort to come and play test it yourself I suppose to decide.
I loved it!

I think that we as trumpeters also have to try and think outside of the box and give new ideas a chance instead of shutting them down without a chance to be tested.


insomma:

I am deeply impressed with Jérôme's work and thick skin. this thread has been incredibly tough on him yet he remains 100% class! this dude is doing it and not just talking about it. whether it pleases everyone or not is impossible to say but this cat has big huevos for putting it out there and trying something different from the mainstream.

the sheer amount of man hours to make a horn 100% from scratch is just daunting! .

I will do what I can to spread the word...............
_________________
ron meza (deadbeat jazz musician) & (TH 5 post ghost neighborhood watch ringleader)
waiting for Fed-Ex to deliver a $50 trumpet to my door. shipping was prepaid by seller of course!
http://ronmeza.com
http://highdefinitionbigband.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
trumpet56
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 623

PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having just read this thread there is one poster who reminds me of our dear friend the Captain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 5 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group