• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

What is the advantage of a heavy mass mouthpiece?


Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Mouthpieces
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OldSchoolEuph
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 2442

PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2024 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Richard III wrote:
Quote:
As far as the physicist's take: Here's an engineering student's explanation of the subject (conveniently he covers mouthpieces first and then at 5:32 goes on to other parts of the system)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtTg9KHkaQM


Very interesting. The part where more mass allows for more energy input without breaking up brought up a question. If the inverse holds true about a light weight system being easier to start the tone but easier for it to break up with more input, does a more open mouthpiece and trumpet offset this? So for instance, does the Claude Gordon personal mouthpiece with an open throat and a skeletonized cup area, paired with a Benge light weight but very open horn produce the best of all worlds?


That gets very complicated. The more open throat (physical openness) allows more actual air to flow. But what we perceive as resistance is actually how much energy we have to put into tone production (not air) in order to achieve a given dynamic at our ears behind the bell. So a horn that responds very lightly due to low inertia will speak easier, achieve that dynamic typically with less effort, and feel "open", but to the audience, it is purely a gain issue, and what you feel/hear may not be what they do. Overall, you may wind up physically working harder to provide added airflow in this scenario even while putting less energy into the embouchure.

Overall, your specific question about greater stability through pairing a minimal mass mouthpiece and large throat with a lightweight trumpet providing additional "head room" before breaking up, the answer would typically be no on the audience side - due to lack of inertia. However, what you perceive as additional dynamic gain due to the construction of the horn and its leak-back characteristics, as well as a biasing of that leak-back spectrum on the high side from all of the aforementioned elements, it might seem that way to the player.
_________________
Ron Berndt
www.trumpet-history.com

2017 Austin Winds Stage 466
1962 Mt. Vernon Bach 43
1954 Holton 49 Stratodyne
1927 Conn 22B
1957 Holton 27 cornet
1985 Yamaha YEP-621
1975 Yamaha YEP-321 Custom
1965 Besson Baritone
1975 Olds Recording R-20
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Mouthpieces All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group