| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Christophomicus Regular Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:05 am Post subject: Unidentified Besson flugel |
|
|
Hello everyone,
I've lurked around the TH forums for about six months now and always meant to get around to making an account, so here I am. I was wondering if anyone here could help identify my flugelhorn.
(click for full-size)
I bought it about three months ago from eBay (I know, I know...) for a couple of hundred, a bargain for a flugel down here in Aus. It's a Besson... and that's about all I know. Serial number of 283302, and it seems to have a standard taper size. I use a GEWA 5C on it and a modern Jet Tone Leon Merian; both have the same taper and both fit fine. Plays beautifully; a real dark, fluffy flugel sound. Love it.
The one thing that stands out when compared to other flugels I've played is the first valve slide; it's straight and horizontal as opposed to, uh, dipping down. You'll have to excuse my lack of technical terminology...
Any help you could give me would be greatly appreciated. I realise the pictures are a bit gnaff (knaff? How do you even spell that?), unfortunately I had to use my phone camera because my point'n'shoot is dead at the moment. Let me know if you'd like to see any more of it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christophomicus Regular Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really, no response? Help a budding young enthusiast out, TH...
I've attached a few more photos taken with a proper camera, but they're arguably worse than my iPhone's; couldn't figure out how to get the darn thing to focus properly...
I forgot to mention earlier that it has Amado spit valves. You can see in the last photo the strange first valve slide I was talking about in my first post. _________________ -B&S Challenger 3137/2, B&H 400, Getzen 300, Getzen Eterna, Jupiter JTR-516
-Bach Stradivarius 184ML, Yamaha YCR2330S, Clipptertone Malta, Besson Imperial Flugelhorn, ACB Doubler's Flugel
-Knight USA Euphonium |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Curry Heavyweight Member
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 1058
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Christophomicus wrote: | Really, no response? Help a budding young enthusiast out, TH...
I've attached a few more photos taken with a proper camera, but they're arguably worse than my iPhone's; couldn't figure out how to get the darn thing to focus properly...
I forgot to mention earlier that it has Amado spit valves. You can see in the last photo the strange first valve slide I was talking about in my first post. |
Christophomicus
The font used on the BESSON engraving on the bell appears to be of the same type used for what I know to be "English" made Bessons. Probably from the 1960's or thereabouts.
Maybe somebody knowledgeable in this area can take over...
She does look a little "strange", though.
If it plays fine and gets the job done, then no worries! _________________ A mouthpiece never missed a note by itself! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JonathanM Heavyweight Member

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 1046 Location: Andrews, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Benge Flugelhorn series from the 60's or so had a first valve slide that ran horizontal with a third that ran vertical. A bit different than your horn but somewhat similar. _________________ Jonathan Milam
Bb Stradivarius 37, Olds Super
Olds Special Cornet
King Trombone
Yamaha Flute
Yamaha MO8 Keyboard
Mouthpieces: Marcinkiewicz, Curry, Kanstul, Bach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christophomicus Regular Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've played on a Bach Stradivarius, an old Holton and an Olds my tutor had, but none of them have compared to this great little horn. I'm not used to playing flugel (mainly a trumpet player (which is kind of a given now that I think about it)), but the tone that comes out of this is better than any other I've played. Beautiful. It certainly 'feels' older than most of the horns I own... or perhaps that's just the nostalgia...
The leadup to the bell (that's the bore, right? I'm a little... a lot uneducated on the technical jargon of brass, but willing to learn ) seems a lot bigger than most flugels I've played. I've done a lot of searching for Besson flugels but never turned up one that looked like mine. All I have to go on is that the seller said it was a professional horn.
Thanks for the advice thus far, Mark. I'll definitely see if I can find out something more with this new knowledge in hand.
JonathonM, thanks! I'll have a squiz into that. Any excuse to look up trumpets and flugels and whatnot...  _________________ -B&S Challenger 3137/2, B&H 400, Getzen 300, Getzen Eterna, Jupiter JTR-516
-Bach Stradivarius 184ML, Yamaha YCR2330S, Clipptertone Malta, Besson Imperial Flugelhorn, ACB Doubler's Flugel
-Knight USA Euphonium |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FrankM Veteran Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2011 Posts: 396 Location: Lincolnshire England
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't respond to this when it was first posted because I didn't know quite what to say. You've got a nice instrument there. The trigger is doubtless a later addition. I have had two of these in their B&H Imperial incarnation. Here is a pic of mine. Not at all unusual here in the UK. Standard issue to military bands back in the day. Both of mine were ex Royal Marines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christophomicus Regular Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FrankM wrote: | Didn't respond to this when it was first posted because I didn't know quite what to say. You've got a nice instrument there. The trigger is doubtless a later addition. I have had two of these in their B&H Imperial incarnation. Here is a pic of mine. Not at all unusual here in the UK. Standard issue to military bands back in the day. Both of mine were ex Royal Marines. |
So they're both made by the same, uh, 'manufacturer' and stamped with B&H in its earlier days, and then Besson in its later days? Unless they're the same? I'm sorry, I thought I knew a fair amount but it turns out my history of brass instruments is sorely lacking
Look at the finish on yours! Mannnn. Maybe I just need to learn to take a better photo, but I wish mine was in such good nick. Perhaps a quick polish wouldn't go astray...
EDIT: I spot a couple of differences, actually... my valves are slightly chunkier (I far prefer yours!) and I have amados versus traditional spit valves. Apart from that though, the comparison is spot-on! _________________ -B&S Challenger 3137/2, B&H 400, Getzen 300, Getzen Eterna, Jupiter JTR-516
-Bach Stradivarius 184ML, Yamaha YCR2330S, Clipptertone Malta, Besson Imperial Flugelhorn, ACB Doubler's Flugel
-Knight USA Euphonium |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
qcm Heavyweight Member

Joined: 08 Apr 2007 Posts: 962 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JonathanM wrote: | | The Benge Flugelhorn series from the 60's or so had a first valve slide that ran horizontal with a third that ran vertical. A bit different than your horn but somewhat similar. |
Yes, but the Benge 1st valve slide, while horizontal, was not at an odd angle like the 1st valve slide is on this Besson.
-Dave
(Proud owner of a LA Benge FL3 flugel) _________________ Dave Edwards
Kanstuls, LA Benges and a Selmer picc.
Performing on my Kanstul 923 D/Eb Trumpet:
http://kanstul.com/detail.php?pass_search=923.0000&pass_instrument=Trumpet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christophomicus Regular Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| qcm wrote: | | JonathanM wrote: | | The Benge Flugelhorn series from the 60's or so had a first valve slide that ran horizontal with a third that ran vertical. A bit different than your horn but somewhat similar. |
Yes, but the Benge 1st valve slide, while horizontal, was not at an odd angle like the 1st valve slide is on this Besson.
-Dave
(Proud owner of a LA Benge FL3 flugel) |
I've just looked up pictures of the FL3, and my god, that is a beautiful instrument. Consider me jealous...
Out of curiosity, what sort of effect would a horizontal slide have compared to a vertical one? Obviously vertical ones are the standard, but I wonder if a horizontal slide would have any significant effect on the tone, much like things like copper bells and rounded tuning slides do on a trumpet... food for thought., I suppose. _________________ -B&S Challenger 3137/2, B&H 400, Getzen 300, Getzen Eterna, Jupiter JTR-516
-Bach Stradivarius 184ML, Yamaha YCR2330S, Clipptertone Malta, Besson Imperial Flugelhorn, ACB Doubler's Flugel
-Knight USA Euphonium |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FrankM Veteran Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2011 Posts: 396 Location: Lincolnshire England
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Christo,
The Amado water keys were probably added later when the trigger was added, which becomes necessary on the 3rd slide & changed on the bell pipe to match. Both instruments are a similar age. When B&H took over Besson, similar lines with interchangable parts were made concurently, up to the early 1970's, when the Sovereigns were introduced. I don't know the mouthpieces you are using but would suggest you try a Wick 3 or 2 (two shank sizes - F & FL). A beautiful rich sonorous tone. Might seem big, but so is a Flugal.
Cheers, Frank |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Stevenson Heavyweight Member
Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 955 Location: Essex, England
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is from the early-mid 1960's and someone has spent money on it,...the amados and trigger were later additions and it has been nicely refinished.
These were good instruments in their day,....you can find out more by the first three digits of the serial number (under the bell section abreast of the valves?) aand which type of vavles it has, ie., black/white plastic guide ring with exposed helical spring,...or, enclosed valves with suspended springs in hangers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christophomicus Regular Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| FrankM wrote: | Hello Christo,
The Amado water keys were probably added later when the trigger was added, which becomes necessary on the 3rd slide & changed on the bell pipe to match. Both instruments are a similar age. When B&H took over Besson, similar lines with interchangable parts were made concurently, up to the early 1970's, when the Sovereigns were introduced. I don't know the mouthpieces you are using but would suggest you try a Wick 3 or 2 (two shank sizes - F & FL). A beautiful rich sonorous tone. Might seem big, but so is a Flugal.
Cheers, Frank |
| Bob Stevenson wrote: | This is from the early-mid 1960's and someone has spent money on it,...the amados and trigger were later additions and it has been nicely refinished.
These were good instruments in their day,....you can find out more by the first three digits of the serial number (under the bell section abreast of the valves?) aand which type of vavles it has, ie., black/white plastic guide ring with exposed helical spring,...or, enclosed valves with suspended springs in hangers. |
So the amados and triggers are custom additions! My, how exciting, I assumed they came with the model - the trigger's in the same lacquer as the rest of the horn, so I just assumed. Oooh boy, this is awesome.
I'll definitely give it a good polish. The only thing I don't like about the instrument is that the valves are very loud, but I can deal with it with how beautiful it sounds. Frank, I play with a modern Jet Tone and a Bach 5C, but I'll definitely check out a Wick too. Never been a fan of Denis Wick when it comes to cornet mouthpieces, but I might change my mind for flugel.
Bob, I'll have a look into it and post in here what I find. So, to check that I've got it right, B&H bought out Besson? I thought they were different companies altogether. Hoo boy. _________________ -B&S Challenger 3137/2, B&H 400, Getzen 300, Getzen Eterna, Jupiter JTR-516
-Bach Stradivarius 184ML, Yamaha YCR2330S, Clipptertone Malta, Besson Imperial Flugelhorn, ACB Doubler's Flugel
-Knight USA Euphonium |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bob Stevenson Heavyweight Member
Joined: 04 May 2005 Posts: 955 Location: Essex, England
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
B&H aquired Besson immediately after WWII, but both factories essentially remained independant. Besson was by far the most prestigous brass make but B&H offered all types of wind instruments and military band sets etc. During the late 50's and onwards there was some co-operation between the two factories (both in North London just a few miles apart) and some inter use of components but the Besson design dept remained independant.
In 1975 B&H decided to kill off Besson totally and all of the product range along with the Besson design dept. to great consternation and anger of more or less the whole British brass band movement.
Circa 1990 B&H attempted to give it's own brass range some urgent and vital 'cache' by disinterring the 'Besson' brand and slapping it on it's own brass,...however, none of these instruments had or have had, ANY Besson input, nor indeed do they look like real Bessons. B&H thus a company so inept that it managed to fold Besson twice! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flugelnut Veteran Member
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 345 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Christophomicus: regarding your query about the impact of the first valve slide being horizontal vs. vertical, IMO soundwise there is no difference (I'll yield to those better informed about accoustics). There is an advantage in condensation management however, the horizontal slide will collect none or very little because most players play with the bell slightly downwards.
In the case of the Benges, they have a first slide saddle to help with intonation. A vertical slide would need a trigger to do that, which is costlier to construct.
My 1982 Benge 5 has a factory-installed third valve trigger as well though, somebody over there (Zig Kanstul?) must have felt it would end up with a player who can use all the tuning help available.
But seriously, I hardly use either of them because the horn is so easily bent in tune with the embouchure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
qcm Heavyweight Member

Joined: 08 Apr 2007 Posts: 962 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Flugelnut wrote: | My 1982 Benge 5 has a factory-installed third valve trigger as well though, somebody over there (Zig Kanstul?) must have felt it would end up with a player who can use all the tuning help available.
But seriously, I hardly use either of them because the horn is so easily bent in tune with the embouchure. |
I also think the 3rd valve slide is a little longer on the Benge than traditional flugel 3rd valve slides, in order to keep the pitch of the low C# and D more in tune.
That is an assumption on my part, partly because those 2 notes are not as sharp as I expected, and because, it does seem longer.
-Dave _________________ Dave Edwards
Kanstuls, LA Benges and a Selmer picc.
Performing on my Kanstul 923 D/Eb Trumpet:
http://kanstul.com/detail.php?pass_search=923.0000&pass_instrument=Trumpet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christophomicus Regular Member

Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bob Stevenson wrote: | B&H aquired Besson immediately after WWII, but both factories essentially remained independant. Besson was by far the most prestigous brass make but B&H offered all types of wind instruments and military band sets etc. During the late 50's and onwards there was some co-operation between the two factories (both in North London just a few miles apart) and some inter use of components but the Besson design dept remained independant.
In 1975 B&H decided to kill off Besson totally and all of the product range along with the Besson design dept. to great consternation and anger of more or less the whole British brass band movement.
Circa 1990 B&H attempted to give it's own brass range some urgent and vital 'cache' by disinterring the 'Besson' brand and slapping it on it's own brass,...however, none of these instruments had or have had, ANY Besson input, nor indeed do they look like real Bessons. B&H thus a company so inept that it managed to fold Besson twice! |
How fascinating! I knew that "modern" Bessons had a reputation for being terrible, but I had no idea of the history behind it. Wow! Thanks for sharing, Bob. _________________ -B&S Challenger 3137/2, B&H 400, Getzen 300, Getzen Eterna, Jupiter JTR-516
-Bach Stradivarius 184ML, Yamaha YCR2330S, Clipptertone Malta, Besson Imperial Flugelhorn, ACB Doubler's Flugel
-Knight USA Euphonium |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GordonH Heavyweight Member

Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 1748 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have one of these. Mine has hexagonal valve caps. It has a typical small bore flugel sound. I got mine from someone who does band room clearances and then services the instruments before selling them. It cost me about the same as a cheap chinese instrument and came in a new case. Valves and slides are nice and tight. Valve action is nice and smooth.
It doesn't seem to need a trigger. I think the third slide is slightly longer than one with a trigger would be, and the slots are wide enough to be able to play it in tune.
[/url] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GordonH Heavyweight Member

Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 1748 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bob Stevenson wrote: | B&H aquired Besson immediately after WWII, but both factories essentially remained independant. Besson was by far the most prestigous brass make but B&H offered all types of wind instruments and military band sets etc. During the late 50's and onwards there was some co-operation between the two factories (both in North London just a few miles apart) and some inter use of components but the Besson design dept remained independant.
In 1975 B&H decided to kill off Besson totally and all of the product range along with the Besson design dept. to great consternation and anger of more or less the whole British brass band movement.
Circa 1990 B&H attempted to give it's own brass range some urgent and vital 'cache' by disinterring the 'Besson' brand and slapping it on it's own brass,...however, none of these instruments had or have had, ANY Besson input, nor indeed do they look like real Bessons. B&H thus a company so inept that it managed to fold Besson twice! |
A few years after they killed off the Imperial range B&H brought out a range called "Boosey and Hawkes Imperial Besson" for the military band market. I had one of the euphoniums. It was identical to sovereign but with a smaller bell and a black case rather than blue. I think this eventually morphed into the smaller Sovereign model. They did a cornet too which was a Sovereign minus the first valve trigger. Basically Boosey and Hawkes management had no concept of the value their Besson brand had (especially internationally) and made a number of critical errors in the way they used the name. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gchun Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Flugelnut wrote: | Christophomicus: regarding your query about the impact of the first valve slide being horizontal vs. vertical, IMO soundwise there is no difference (I'll yield to those better informed about accoustics). There is an advantage in condensation management however, the horizontal slide will collect none or very little because most players play with the bell slightly downwards.
In the case of the Benges, they have a first slide saddle to help with intonation. A vertical slide would need a trigger to do that, which is costlier to construct.
My 1982 Benge 5 has a factory-installed third valve trigger as well though, somebody over there (Zig Kanstul?) must have felt it would end up with a player who can use all the tuning help available.
But seriously, I hardly use either of them because the horn is so easily bent in tune with the embouchure. |
Never thought about the water collection issue. Makes sense!
I would also think that unless the horn is redesigned, a horizontal slide (when removed) might have problems clearing the bell bow. I guessed that that Besson in photo had the horizontal slide at a angle so it could clear the bell.
Just some guesses.
Garry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GordonH Heavyweight Member

Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 1748 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gchun wrote: | | Flugelnut wrote: | Christophomicus: regarding your query about the impact of the first valve slide being horizontal vs. vertical, IMO soundwise there is no difference (I'll yield to those better informed about accoustics). There is an advantage in condensation management however, the horizontal slide will collect none or very little because most players play with the bell slightly downwards.
In the case of the Benges, they have a first slide saddle to help with intonation. A vertical slide would need a trigger to do that, which is costlier to construct.
My 1982 Benge 5 has a factory-installed third valve trigger as well though, somebody over there (Zig Kanstul?) must have felt it would end up with a player who can use all the tuning help available.
But seriously, I hardly use either of them because the horn is so easily bent in tune with the embouchure. |
Never thought about the water collection issue. Makes sense!
I would also think that unless the horn is redesigned, a horizontal slide (when removed) might have problems clearing the bell bow. I guessed that that Besson in photo had the horizontal slide at a angle so it could clear the bell.
Just some guesses.
Garry |
When Boosey and Hawkes redesigned it as the "Sovereign" it stayed much the same except the first valve slide was made vertical.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|