| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Steve A Heavyweight Member

Joined: 26 May 2006 Posts: 607 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject: Working on 2nd Playing |
|
|
So, we spend a lot of time here talking about general trumpet playing exercises, and a reasonable amount about the specific skills needed for good 1st playing. Sometimes, we discuss 2nd playing from a standpoint of balance, blend, ensemble playing, and all these things are great, but I'm hoping that we might get some informed opinions about how to practice some of the specific playing challenges one finds more frequently in 2nd playing, such as cold entrances on low notes, and leaps of big and non-melodic intervals.
Anyone have any ideas about particular ways to improve definition, clarity, consistency, and quality in low notes, and in lines that jump all over the place? (And, other thoughts about specific 2nd playing challenges are also welcome!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dale Proctor Heavyweight Member

Joined: 26 May 2005 Posts: 6884 Location: Heart of Dixie
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sort of the perennial 2nd player around town. Unless I have quite a bit of playing above the staff to do (which usually doesn't happen on 2nd parts) I play on a larger mouthpiece to help the low notes come out, whether cold or not. For me, that's a 1-1/2C or 3C on trumpet. For cornet, it's a Curry 3BBC. Practicing low notes and cold starts is also helpful. For lines that jump all over the place, I've found working exercises from the Schlossberg book to be a big help. It's entertaining to see someone who plays 1st parts almost exclusively struggle with a 2nd part because of the way the harmony lines are all over the place. _________________ Olde Towne Brass
www.otbrass.com
Brass Band of Huntsville
www.brassbandofhuntsville.com
"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheiden Heavyweight Member
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Posts: 3571 Location: Orange County, CA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It seems to me that playing 2nd requires nearly all of the skill of playing 1st PLUS a huge burden to listen and match/complement the 1st. I've heard several accomplished players say that they consider playing 2nd to be harder than 1st because of this. I can't imagine any way to improve in this area other than lots of playing with really good 1st players. _________________ "I'm an engineer, which means I think I know a whole bunch of stuff I really don't."
Charles J Heiden/So Cal
Bach Strad 180ML43*/43 Bb
Yamaha 731 Flugel
Kanstul 920 Picc
Conn 80A Cornet
Bach 3C rim/Bach 1-1/2C underpart |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
benlewis Heavyweight Member

Joined: 21 Jan 2004 Posts: 561 Location: Memphis, TN
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Marc Reese had an article in the ITG Journal a few issues back that addressed this matter. A very insightful and entertaining read… |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jmberinger Regular Member
Joined: 20 Jun 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Orange County, California
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is an interesting topic as not only is the second required to match volume, tonal quality and pitch, but to do so in a manner that promotes and supports the first part. Listening to all of the parts, including the third and possibly the fourth, for the blend and then adding the part to the orchestra can be difficult.
In orchestral works, the rather extensive leaps from the lower register to the unison of an octave, or, in more modern works, playing in a "separate" part and then joining for section work is much more demanding than the first part. And much more entertaining as well. _________________ John M. Beringer, Jr.
Bach 229 LC (Malone Leadpipe); Bach Bb 180S37; Eastman D/Eb. Bush WX-S Mouthpiece |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ricetrpt Veteran Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 118 Location: Watertown, MA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is a really good topic. I'd love to know what leaping second trumpet parts you are referring to (other than Firebird). A lot of the Beethoven, Haydn, Mozart, etc... second parts have leaps in the parts from octaves to unison, but standard performance practice is for the 2nd trumpet to play these notes down an octave.
Either way, I think that ear training is one of the most important aspects of playing section parts. Often times, the inner parts are so much harder to hear than the melody, and we find ourselves struggling to play in tune. If you can sing, or better yet, solfegge your second and third trumpet parts, the pitch will be MUCH better. It's really challenging, particularly as the music gets more and more complicated. The section parts to the march in the first movement of Shostakovich 5 come to mind.
I think it's also important that a second trumpet player doesn't play too quietly. Those low entrances are often in octaves with the first part, and the bottom octave needs to be stronger than the top for blend and balance. I know that doesn't help with the mechanics of playing those notes, but it may if those notes are being approached timidly. Again, really hearing the pitch before you play it is invaluable.
As far as the mechanics of playing the leaps that may be required in the second trumpet rep, I can't think of a better place to start than page 125 of the Arban book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Bond Heavyweight Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2004 Posts: 1229 Location: Metropolitan Opera
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:41 pm Post subject: Re: Working on 2nd Playing |
|
|
| Steve A wrote: | So, we spend a lot of time here talking about general trumpet playing exercises, and a reasonable amount about the specific skills needed for good 1st playing. Sometimes, we discuss 2nd playing from a standpoint of balance, blend, ensemble playing, and all these things are great, but I'm hoping that we might get some informed opinions about how to practice some of the specific playing challenges one finds more frequently in 2nd playing, such as cold entrances on low notes, and leaps of big and non-melodic intervals.
Anyone have any ideas about particular ways to improve definition, clarity, consistency, and quality in low notes, and in lines that jump all over the place? (And, other thoughts about specific 2nd playing challenges are also welcome!) |
Contrary to what a lot of people think (myself included, 20yrs ago) a good second player does not (musically) chase the first player all over the place, but rather lays down his/her part with rock-solid time and pitch to give the principal something to hang on to. This requires daily attention to fundamentals; time, rhythm, intonation (in the much-neglected low register), attack, and a clear & vibrant tone. Consistency is also important and much appreciated by the principal.
Many play as if second is all about musical anonymity - hiding dynamically or tonally, or making a vague, foggy sound. This fosters uncertainty and is a nightmare for intonation.
Cold entrances? Frequent rests during practice can help practice this.
Try to steer away from practicing as strength training (muy macho trumpet) and more toward finesse. The feeling required for playing much of this stuff is delicate and almost 'dainty' as compared to the sound that is produced when playing efficiently. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphnz Heavyweight Member

Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 1564 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was just thinking about this a few weeks ago, while playing 2nd for Brahms' Piano Concerto No. 2. There's one jump in the 2nd movement where we were an octave apart, then a third - I think it was a 13th for me. But there was no time to think about it because there were a whole lot more notes to come, and I still had to cover much more ground than my colleague, rangewise. If only the audience knew how much I stressed over those two notes, how many times I practised that jump...
Nailed it though.
Incidentally, Firebird's coming up later this year. Should I be worried? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laser170323 Veteran Member

Joined: 18 May 2007 Posts: 132
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:12 am Post subject: Re: Working on 2nd Playing |
|
|
Mr. Bond,
I think you write the best posts: informative, funny, and right on the money. Thank you.
Laser170323
| Peter Bond wrote: | | Steve A wrote: | So, we spend a lot of time here talking about general trumpet playing exercises, and a reasonable amount about the specific skills needed for good 1st playing. Sometimes, we discuss 2nd playing from a standpoint of balance, blend, ensemble playing, and all these things are great, but I'm hoping that we might get some informed opinions about how to practice some of the specific playing challenges one finds more frequently in 2nd playing, such as cold entrances on low notes, and leaps of big and non-melodic intervals.
Anyone have any ideas about particular ways to improve definition, clarity, consistency, and quality in low notes, and in lines that jump all over the place? (And, other thoughts about specific 2nd playing challenges are also welcome!) |
Contrary to what a lot of people think (myself included, 20yrs ago) a good second player does not (musically) chase the first player all over the place, but rather lays down his/her part with rock-solid time and pitch to give the principal something to hang on to. This requires daily attention to fundamentals; time, rhythm, intonation (in the much-neglected low register), attack, and a clear & vibrant tone. Consistency is also important and much appreciated by the principal.
Many play as if second is all about musical anonymity - hiding dynamically or tonally, or making a vague, foggy sound. This fosters uncertainty and is a nightmare for intonation.
Cold entrances? Frequent rests during practice can help practice this.
Try to steer away from practicing as strength training (muy macho trumpet) and more toward finesse. The feeling required for playing much of this stuff is delicate and almost 'dainty' as compared to the sound that is produced when playing efficiently. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jmberinger Regular Member
Joined: 20 Jun 2007 Posts: 20 Location: Orange County, California
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I particularly liked the comment of the second providing the “foundation” for the first trumpet with steady pitch/rhythm; and I completely agree with it. When I was primarily playing first in orchestras in college (25 years ago) I was constantly talking to the second and third trumpet to play up in volume to allow the harmonic play to complement what was going on in the section.
Their active involvement allowed me to reduce/focus my volume contribution and it encouraged a more sectional approach to the musical concept. As I told a student recently, there is a reason that there are two and sometimes three trumpet parts, and it was not because it was mandated by the Musician’s Union.
One other thought, are there any trumpet principals with a major symphony that bring their own second player with them? Are there any thoughts regarding how to develop as a second trumpet player? _________________ John M. Beringer, Jr.
Bach 229 LC (Malone Leadpipe); Bach Bb 180S37; Eastman D/Eb. Bush WX-S Mouthpiece |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aspeyr1 Regular Member
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ricetrpt wrote: | | This is a really good topic. I'd love to know what leaping second trumpet parts you are referring to (other than Firebird). |
Not exactly sure what "leaping" parts means, but there are more than a few pieces where the 2nd trumpet plays rather high and low (just writing composers not piece names);
Bartok
Bruckner
Copland (symphony no. 3 particularly)
Mahler
Resphigi
Shostakovitch
Stravinsky
Vaughan Williams
...ect |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Qnaza Veteran Member

Joined: 04 Mar 2008 Posts: 271
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dale Proctor wrote: | | It's entertaining to see someone who plays 1st parts almost exclusively struggle with a 2nd part because of the way the harmony lines are all over the place. |
Totally agree. Different context, but in a similar vein, I usually play second in my local big band but did a gig on fourth one evening when my chops were flat from playing a lot the day before. It was the weirdest experience playing the same rhythms but having to really listen to what I was playing since it was almost all harmony.
If anyone wants to flummox a lead player, give them the last 2 lines of In The Mood, but from the 4th trumpet pad. Now THAT is some serious jumping about and sight reading!  _________________ “Do or do not... there is no try.” |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Swartz Heavyweight Member
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 5412 Location: Des Moines, IA area
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aspeyr1 wrote: | | Ricetrpt wrote: | | This is a really good topic. I'd love to know what leaping second trumpet parts you are referring to (other than Firebird). |
Not exactly sure what "leaping" parts means, but there are more than a few pieces where the 2nd trumpet plays rather high and low (just writing composers not piece names);
Bartok
Bruckner
Copland (symphony no. 3 particularly)
Mahler
Resphigi
Shostakovitch
Stravinsky
Vaughan Williams
...ect | I'm sure the reference is due to the parts for orchestra by composers from Haydn though Beethoven and beyond that were written with the natural trumpet in mind. These had only certain partials available so there are times when the second part will jump from a low octave interval to, say, an octave and a fifth higher since it was not possible to play the fifth in the lower octave, making it unison with the first part. (I think there were even a couple of these in Dvorak 7 last weekend but I don't keep track...)
Personally, I always play the ink- it isn't that difficult to make the interval. I'm certain were modern instruments available at the time, the composers would've kept things in octaves but I like to keep things authentic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
connicalman Heavyweight Member

Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 1346 Location: West Medford, MA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In quintet I had the 2nd book. In an early practice the group at times, and especially my part, sounded muddy. Some of the best advice I got here on TH was to "make it shine", and 'let it speak' as regards to the 2nd part. When I no longer played with too much deference to the lead, the entire quintet lit up. A very good, and much appreciated lesson about everyone pulling their weight and not allowing for any shadows. _________________ kochaavim, csillaagkep, αστερρισμός, konnstelacji, connstellation... ...a.k.a. 28A |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve A Heavyweight Member

Joined: 26 May 2006 Posts: 607 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Craig Swartz wrote: |
Personally, I always play the ink- it isn't that difficult to make the interval. I'm certain were modern instruments available at the time, the composers would've kept things in octaves but I like to keep things authentic. |
Of course, there's no right or wrong answer here, and I'm not meaning to agree or disagree, but just as it relates to the topic of authenticity in 2nd trumpet playing, this article springs to mind:
http://www.thomasstevensmusic.com/quotablesPage.php?Trumpet-Traditions-I-About-Those-Octaves-19 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dale Proctor Heavyweight Member

Joined: 26 May 2005 Posts: 6884 Location: Heart of Dixie
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| connicalman wrote: | | In quintet I had the 2nd book. In an early practice the group at times, and especially my part, sounded muddy. Some of the best advice I got here on TH was to "make it shine", and 'let it speak' as regards to the 2nd part. When I no longer played with too much deference to the lead, the entire quintet lit up. A very good, and much appreciated lesson about everyone pulling their weight and not allowing for any shadows. |
Yep, playing 2nd part in a traditional brass quintet is more like playing a second 1st part, if that makes sense. You don't play a lot of harmony lines with the 1st player - you play a lot more exposed lines, just like the 1st player does. You have to play with a "solo" mindset in these situations. _________________ Olde Towne Brass
www.otbrass.com
Brass Band of Huntsville
www.brassbandofhuntsville.com
"Brass bands are all very well in their place - outdoors and several miles away ." - Sir Thomas Beecham |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ricetrpt Veteran Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2003 Posts: 118 Location: Watertown, MA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steve- Thanks for the link to Thomas Stevens' article. It's a great read.
For whatever it's worth, when it comes to playing the written unisons as octaves, I think we need to not only consider the capabilities of the natural trumpets, but also the timbre. Anyone who has played a natural trumpet or even listened to them a fair amount knows that they don't have as bright of a sound as the modern trumpets. Two natural trumpets playing in unison wouldn't cut through an orchestra the way two modern horns would. Of course, on our modern trumpets we can just back off the sound for the unisons, but I find it to be less challenging both musically and mechanically to keep the octaves going.
Like Stevens says, there is no right or wrong answer. [/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Craig Swartz Heavyweight Member
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 5412 Location: Des Moines, IA area
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Steve A wrote: | | Craig Swartz wrote: |
Personally, I always play the ink- it isn't that difficult to make the interval. I'm certain were modern instruments available at the time, the composers would've kept things in octaves but I like to keep things authentic. |
Of course, there's no right or wrong answer here, and I'm not meaning to agree or disagree, but just as it relates to the topic of authenticity in 2nd trumpet playing, this article springs to mind:
http://www.thomasstevensmusic.com/quotablesPage.php?Trumpet-Traditions-I-About-Those-Octaves-19 |
I've read the Stevens article. I also listen to a lot of recordings. The vast majority of the recordings I own have tpt playing the ink. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|