| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
robert_white Heavyweight Member
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 1539
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Stop paying so much attention to the trumpet player (or the brass for that matter). You'll enjoy the music much more! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan in Sydney Veteran Member

Joined: 30 Nov 2007 Posts: 146 Location: Sydney, Australia/ Sarasota, Florida
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:29 pm Post subject: Re: Glenn |
|
|
| Froggynut wrote: | Boy do I miss Glenn Fischthal................
There will be nobody like him...
 |
A big +1! I had the privilege of playing beside him for a year in the Israel Phil under Mehta. He then went to SF and I to Sydney. Great guy too! _________________ Principal Trumpet,
Sydney Symphony (1978-2011)
Lecturer in Trumpet, Australian National University 1990-2010
Bach Artist and Clinician, Soloist
http://www.bachbrass.com/artists/profile.php?aid=1019
"Breathe musically to play musically" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poochie Heavyweight Member
Joined: 15 Nov 2004 Posts: 1316 Location: New Jersey,so what!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| To quote Jim Pandolfi"you can play every note and still miss them all". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gringoloco Heavyweight Member
Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 1090 Location: Mérida, Yucatan
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tom Rolfs is obviously at the top of his field and an inspirational player, but this thread touches exactly on what is so special about Charlie Schleuter.
If you want to talk about a clear individual style, I think he is probably the best recent example. Of course, the number of people winning jobs these days on Monettes and using his particular approach to phrasing and articulation does point to exactly what you mention as a problem. Lack of diversity.
So, let's do something about it. Let's all make commitment to taking chances musically and sonically.
We should also make it illegal for any music director to buy a CD.
Rob |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tubbs831 Heavyweight Member

Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 644 Location: Massachusetts/New Hampshire
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I definitely get what you're saying about Charlie, but I believe Tom Rolfs also has a distinctive style. I've heard some very special concerts at Symphony hall the past few years. He's got a different sound than a lot of other orchestral players and he doesn't play it safe imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Bond Heavyweight Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2004 Posts: 1229 Location: Metropolitan Opera
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| poochie wrote: | | To quote Jim Pandolfi"you can play every note and still miss them all". |
Absolutely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrClean Heavyweight Member

Joined: 27 Feb 2003 Posts: 1963 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:09 am Post subject: Re: New breed of orchestral trumpet player |
|
|
| mahler32 wrote: | I have come to the realization that personality and the "individual" is being taken out of the orchestral trumpeter. Gone are the days of principal trumpet players who mowed down the winds section and guffawed at the conductors palm.
Principal players sounds are sterile and bland to my ears. I'm not talking about the Phil Smith's and Mike Sachs and Chris Martin's of the world. I'm speaking of a few current players in major orchestra's. I just don't get it! Every note is perfectly placed and spot on pitch but soulless as a turnip. Is this the conductor's fault for wanting to hire a robot that never misses or are trumpet players losing the ego and bravado that once gained them reputations?
I'm sorry to vent but was just wondering if I was the only one......and I'm never the only one  |
Well, we have evolved a bit. I doubt very much that either Phil, Mike or Chris walk into a rehearsal or concert with the intent to "mow down a wind section" or "guffaw at a conductor's palm". Good way to find yourself looking for a new job...
I find it interesting that some of the notable examples of "good" principal playing are players that are known for their ability to bury an orchestra, something they trot out on a regular basis. Well, if that is the yardstick for good playing, I guess that would explain why you guys are so perplexed that the National Symphony hasn't picked a winner yet. If that is what is most important to you, perhaps you should stick listening to big bands.
Listen, I agree with the "you can play every note and still miss them all" sentiment, but I really think you're being unfair here. Have you heard every major orchestra in the same venue, in the same setup? If you are relying on broadcasts or recordings, that is your first mistake, because you are now listening to balances that have passed through the artistic "prism" of the audio engineers.
Being unique, in and of itself, does not necessarily mean the same thing as being exceptional, or even good. There are plenty of players you could easily identify in three notes that you wouldn't want playing in your community band, let alone the NY Phil. Every person has their own idea of what constitutes musical, and I'm sorry if the new breed of players doesn't do it for you, but thank God for iTunes, right? There are plenty of examples of old school there to keep you happy.
This may not be the case with you, but I often see players that try to label their own lack of technical ability, bad intonation or unstable sound as "musical" or "expressive", to which I reply, b.s. Yes, it is very "human", but deeply flawed, and personally I cannot listen past glaring deficiencies. The archives are peppered with this type of playing. I don't blame those players, as it was all part of the evolutionary process to get us to where we are today, but I've got no desire to return to the "good old days". Seriously, would you prefer an old recording of Berlin or Vienna from the 50s or 60s to what is coming out of those brass sections today? Matthias Höfs too perfect for you?
Finally, I can't help feel that some of this criticism is aimed squarely at one of my colleagues, and my polite reply to this is "we'll just agree to disagree". Said colleague is not only a spectacular player, but he pours all of himself into each performance and cares very deeply about what is getting out front. There is no "phoning it in" here.
J _________________ Jim Wilt
LA Philharmonic
Colburn School
Last edited by MrClean on Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:37 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tptplayer Veteran Member
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Amen,Jim.Thanks for a wonderful reply from someone who does it, as does the un- named colleague. I remember working with him 6-8 years ago thinking quietly" yep, a bit of seasoning and he's gonna be the real deal". As for the rest of the argument, I feel that many orchestras do sound more alike these days, and miss the old differences in nuance. That, however,has nothing to do with the spectacular heights the new generation of trumpet playing has achieved, and has everything to do with the small amount of great conductors making their imprint on the music.
My 5¢ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nonsense Eliminator Heavyweight Member
Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 4244 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bravo, Jim. _________________ Richard Sandals
NBO ~ HSSB ~ TNB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve A Heavyweight Member

Joined: 26 May 2006 Posts: 607 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:09 pm Post subject: Re: New breed of orchestral trumpet player |
|
|
| mahler32 wrote: | I have come to the realization that personality and the "individual" is being taken out of the orchestral trumpeter. Gone are the days of principal trumpet players who mowed down the winds section and guffawed at the conductors palm.
|
With no offense intended to great players of the past, I think this is just simply a bad model for orchestral trumpet playing greatness. Principal players who mow down the winds or guffaw at the conductor do that at the expense of the quality of the orchestra at large, and of the music itself.
Also, say what you want about "ego" or "bravado", or whatever, but lots and lots of those classic orchestras had frequent intonation problems that you wouldn't even find in middling orchestras today. The technical standards of playing and discipline have gone up across the board. Frankly, I'd rather go hear someone who plays their part, and their role, and who does it with finesse and control, rather than someone who plays every halfnote as loud as possible.
On a side note, I'm not suggesting that you should specify who you have this grudge against (not least of all since many accomplished people had to agree to put him or her in that spot in the first place), but simply saying "many principal players, but not so and so, or so and so, or so and so, or so and so, or so and so .... but many are bland and sterile" is a pretty meaninglessly vague (dare I say, bland?) statement to make. If you want to discuss specifics, then people who don't agree can make specific counter-arguments. If you generally impugn many fine players with a broad brush, there's no discussion - just mudslinging. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TrentAustin Heavyweight Member

Joined: 06 Nov 2002 Posts: 4354 Location: Boston
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vin DiBona Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Dec 2003 Posts: 529 Location: OHare area
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Add another BRAVO for Jim.
Herseth, Voisin, Johnson, Vacchiano, Adelstein, and all the other greats of the past generation never laid waste to a woodwind section or guffawed at a conductors palm. Neither they nor their musical directors would have tolerated such playing.
Listen to the fabulous Gabrielli recording with the Chicago, Cleveland, and Philadelphia brass sections. Without looking, it can be difficult to tell exactly who is playing.
R. Tomasek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
andrewmccandless Regular Member
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 33 Location: toronto
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is what I'm wondering?
Last night we played Shostakovich 11 here in Toronto. In the midst of really going for two big solos I had two really big cacks. Other than that I played the piece pretty well. Ok pitch, rhythm etc... On Wednesday night I had no cacks and went for it equally. So which one was better? Does this make me unique, or not unique? (Judging by the look on the conductors face, the cacks were very unique.) If I had gone for it less and gotten the notes on Thursday would that have been better or worse? As you can see I'm a little confused and I'd like to get this straightened out in my mind for future performances and recordings.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Best,
Andrew
ps. By the way we just released a live recording of this piece this week on the TSO live label. If anyone is interested I think you can get it on Itunes. I warn you in advance that you may be forced to turn it off half through... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TrptSTP Veteran Member
Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 325 Location: Kansas
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did anyone read the Mark Gould article in the latest ITG journal? I believe this is what the OP is getting at here. Mr. Gould's article was about Mel Broiles and some of the legendary tidbits that people usually ask about. The article ends with Mr. Gould making remarks about the state of trumpet playing in terms of personal style. This is along the lines of what is happening in this post.
I think the musicality versus accuracy argument could be boiled down to people wanting to hear musicians (not just trumpet players) play with abandon. It also just happens that the style of playing portrayed as positive in this thread also often correlates to older individuals who were or still are ridiculously good trumpet players and musicians. That older style of playing is a different sound. As with most things in life and art, different is often translated to "bad" or threatening.
Opinions are fine. But at the end of the day, the people in the big orchestras are there (usually as I understand it) because they are top notch, and arguably the best at what they do. Having opinions as to who is your favorite is fine, making digs about someone in a major orchestra is something altogether different... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tpter1 Heavyweight Member
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 874
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow. Jim, that was the post of the century.
I’m not "in the ring” so to speak, but I have been to a few concerts as a listener. I notice a huge difference from group to group, player to player. I do not see the evidence of loss of identity. As far as risky playing goes... I’ve heard ppp playing that would make you soil yourself. THAT is risk taking. _________________ -Glenn Roberts
"Character is the backbone of human culture, and music is the flowering of human character". -Confucious |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StupidBrassObsession Veteran Member
Joined: 25 Mar 2012 Posts: 341
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Melbourne Symphony Orchestra (Australia) has a great principal trumpet player called Jeff Payne who takes no prisoners. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
etc-etc Heavyweight Member
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 3963
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The "raising of the bar" is a by-product of ever fewer orchestral positions available. Back in 50's or 60's the best musicians were spread out wider because more orchestras existed. If you did put together the best players into each section of a 50's or 60's orchestra, you would get the result as good or better than today. Maurice Andre, anyone? Rafael Mendez? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bagmangood Heavyweight Member

Joined: 26 Feb 2009 Posts: 885 Location: Bostonish
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The way it was once described to me is that there is a more common sound concept (hey Bud, how're you doing?) amongst the American orchestras.
Each player sounds like themselves, but they're working with an American sound. Blame Bach for making really good sounding horns for many years, blame Bud for being so good, blame whoever you want, but the point was that we as a nation are getting a national sound. This is probably helped by just how available sound clips and full pieces of any orchestra you want because of CDs and now the internet
There isn't as much of a Chicago vs. Philly vs. Boston sound anymore, its an American one. This isn't necessarily a bad thing (though I guess we'll never have another Ghitalla) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robert_white Heavyweight Member
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 1539
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| etc-etc wrote: | | Back in 50's or 60's the best musicians were spread out wider because more orchestras existed. |
Just to clarify, this is not true if you are talking about orchestras which provided full-time employment or something of the sort.
It is arguable that there were more opportunities for a trumpeter to make a living in those decades - but symphonic employment is far more available now than it was then. To wit - several ICSOM orchestras didn't exist, or were essentially community orchestras in the 50s and 60s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vin DiBona Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Dec 2003 Posts: 529 Location: OHare area
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to clarify one point of my previous post.
Those fabulous players on the Gabrielli did have different sounds, yet on that recording they matched and blended with each other with skills only the best of the best have.
R. Tomasek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|