• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Blueprinting


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
chuck in ny
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 3597
Location: New York

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

things depend on what needs to be done on what horn. for a kanstul it could go to flip oakes. for something like a bach leadpipe change charlie melk is your guy. jim becker has been at it vastly improving bach trumpets for a good bit and it's put up or shut up everybody reports major improvement.
there is a short list of good technicians who could actually be sent a horn to work on with no talk or directions whatsoever. they know. there's nothing to go wrong with the transaction. if you send your horn to anyone but the very best good luck with that. it's also vastly less expensive to use the best so go figure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TrumpetMD
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 2412
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I appreciate AJCarter's and Faldo's observations about blueprinting. And I appreciate Jim Becker's experience and comments.

I think we're making an assumption that certain modifications will always result in an improvement. Or as Jim said, "[they blueprinted] trumpets that were very good to begin with and elevated them to the next level."

I'm not disagreeing with this. In reality, I have no basis for agreeing or disagreeing with these statements. But I wonder if there is any objective evidence to support this? (Not that there needs to be. I'm just wondering.) To clarify, any personal before-and-after appraisal is likely to be somewhat subjective. It would be interesting if there was a blind test of a number of horns (by someone with no "skin in the game"), some blueprinted, others not, to see if the blueprinted horns could be identified.

Mike
_________________
Bach Stradivarius 43* Trumpet (1974), Bach 6C Mouthpiece.
Bach Stradivarius 184 Cornet (1988), Yamaha 13E4 Mouthpiece
Olds L-12 Flugelhorn (1969), Yamaha 13F4 Mouthpiece.
Plus a few other Bach, Getzen, Olds, Carol, HN White, and Besson horns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LittleRusty
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 12656
Location: Gardena, Ca

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TrumpetMD wrote:
It would be interesting if there was a blind test of a number of horns (by someone with no "skin in the game"), some blueprinted, others not, to see if the blueprinted horns could be identified.

Mike

This is assumes that the non-blueprinted horns were equal to begin with. The only way would be to do a before and after comparison, which of course introduces bias. Perhaps by having a larger number of people do the before and after would be better?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TKSop
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 23 Feb 2014
Posts: 1735
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleRusty wrote:
TrumpetMD wrote:
It would be interesting if there was a blind test of a number of horns (by someone with no "skin in the game"), some blueprinted, others not, to see if the blueprinted horns could be identified.

Mike

This is assumes that the non-blueprinted horns were equal to begin with. The only way would be to do a before and after comparison, which of course introduces bias. Perhaps by having a larger number of people do the before and after would be better?


Or could you line up a table full of horns (say 8-10?) and have several players put them in order from best to worst...
Then blueprint the 2-3 that consistently come up as the worst ones, keeping the rest stock, and then re-run the test.

If the blueprinting process is as effective as it sounds like it is, then you'd expect these horns to go up the list considerably, possibly (probably?) from being worst to being best.

This way you're using multiple players, and you're keeping most of the horns standard as controls.
My experience (albeit only once) is that double-blind, several players picked out the same best and worst horns from a batch of 4 - with a bigger sample size and more horns, I'd expect the results would be reliable enough to draw conclusions from.

It'd be an interesting experiment to do, I strongly suspect the blueprinting would come up trumps - it seems to stand to reason that abnormalities would be detrimental, somehow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James Becker
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2827
Location: Littleton, MA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be clear, the aim of blueprinting is to take an off the shelf instrument, find it's flaws and correct them in order to realize it's fullest potential. The cumulative effect of eliminating multiple perturbations in the bore results in a more efficient system.

Over the years we've encountered all styles and types of players. I can provide customers with the reference measurements recorded on their blueprinting shop card, but turns out most don't care to know the details, they just want to play the best instrument they can. The numbers on the cards don't lie and they don't need to, the proof is in the positive feedback we receive from our customers.

We've arrived at this process from many years of experience (over 100 years combined between the three of us) by working with some of the finest brass players in New England and beyond. Ours skills as players and technicians have been elevated by the demands of our clientele.

No matter your skill level, it's our mission to provide you an instrument that's more of a joy to play.

I hope this is helpful.
_________________
James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com

Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
a.kemp
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 677
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

First off, I want to also chime in that Jim's blueprinting is excellent!
He blueprinted 2 horns for me and the results were superb. Price varies depending what needs to be addressed. Nothing is done to the horn without Jim being up front and telling the owner of the horns needs and ballpark price.

Second, I believe that although anybody can have blueprinting done, it's aimed at professional trumpet players and aspiring professionals. People who play the horn everyday and know the intricacies of their horn.

I don't expect someone who doesn't play everyday or hasn't played for long to necessarily benefit from some of these fixes.

And, having a blind test doesn't address what blueprinting is all about. Every trumpet is different. This service is about 'your trumpet'.

I could play 8-10 Bach or yamahas. Some will be what I consider great. But, familiarity with "my horn" more often than not will trump another great horn. Because there are things we get used to. And, if you play this horn all day/everyday, it becomes a whole new comfort level.

Now, if you can refine an already good horn, the benefits to a professional are immeasurable. It's not only about sounding better. It also becomes about being able to do your job easier.

I'd gladly pay $330-450 for upgrading a horn that I use everyday to make a living. A dollar a day for a year? To make my job a few % easier? Sign me up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rod Haney
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 937

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok - so who is making a trumpet dynamometer?

OR - could it be we really DONT want to know - muahahaha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TrumpetMD
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 2412
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

James Becker wrote:
... the proof is in the positive feedback we receive from our customers.

a.kemp wrote:
And, having a blind test doesn't address what blueprinting is all about. Every trumpet is different. This service is about 'your trumpet'.

I agree with Jim and a.kemp on this. In the end, it's all about what someone thinks about his/her trumpet. That's the bottom line.

I was just wondering if there were objective measures of any these processes. I also clarified that I didn't think it was necessary to have objective measures of these processes. I just wondered if they existed, or how one might go about doing it.

Mike
_________________
Bach Stradivarius 43* Trumpet (1974), Bach 6C Mouthpiece.
Bach Stradivarius 184 Cornet (1988), Yamaha 13E4 Mouthpiece
Olds L-12 Flugelhorn (1969), Yamaha 13F4 Mouthpiece.
Plus a few other Bach, Getzen, Olds, Carol, HN White, and Besson horns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James Becker
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2827
Location: Littleton, MA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To paraphrase Tom Rolfs when explaining my intended course of action to repair his Bach C trumpet.

Stop, I don't want to know, I just want to play it.

Like I've said before, our customers are more interested in results rather than process.
_________________
James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com

Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Rod Haney
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 937

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chasing the perfect horn is much easier than developing the player behind it, and a whole lot less work. Of course if doing both - game on, but I have found in my talent limited pursuit that what's behind the horn that make 98% of the sound coming out. Some horns I played poorly a year ago are sounding good now because my breath support is stronger a year after starting back after a very long health related absence. I played large bore horns in the 60's that do not suit me at all now. Then I played what the big band guys played regardless of my play characteristics, cause that's what the guys that turned my crank played. Now the Internet and people other than famed instructors have access to such a wide range of useful and at times worthless information. I think where I'm trying to go with this rAmble is that I believe any horn can be made to match you given its design, it's still up to you to find the right horn to have improved. I believe that a guy could make a stock Bach 37 play better for me than any other Bach 37 in the world- but I could never believe a Bach is the best instrument for me based on playing many brands. So yes I believe in specialists improving things, but I don't believe anyone can turn a leopard into a lion!
Rod
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chuck in ny
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 3597
Location: New York

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

this discussion has strayed into improbable territory. it's hard to squeeze dollars out of the trumpet crowd. this is a <very> tough crowd. if there was anything at all fishy about osmun's work people would be screaming about the too small amount of improvement and so forth and they wouldn't have a business anymore.
talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth. there is too much music in this and not enough business sense. even though there is a quid pro quo of paying to have the work done, osmun is doing you a favor. for the classic work on bachs there is nobody else working to that level.
the same applies to flip oakes for those who go for his products, when he goes or hangs it up forget about getting something further. there is only one technician with him, extremely tepid sales, and only so many units are going to be made while he's on the earth. who is doing whom a favor here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dr_trumpet
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Nov 2001
Posts: 2533
Location: Cope, IN

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleRusty wrote:
This tangential discussion reminds me of a homily:

Nikola Tesla visited Henry Ford at his factory, which was having some kind of difficulty. Ford asked Tesla if he could help identify the problem area. Tesla walked up to a wall of boilerplate and made a small X in chalk on one of the plates. Ford was thrilled, and told him to send an invoice.

The bill arrived, for $10,000. Ford asked for a breakdown. Tesla sent another invoice, indicating a $1 charge for marking the wall with an X, and $9,999 for knowing where to put it.


If one thinks the knowledge is too expensive, one is of course welcome to work on one's own instrument. Great story! Thanks for reminding us of it!
_________________
Dr. Albert L. Lilly, III DM
Artist/Clinician for Vincent Bach Trumpets (Conn-Selmer)
Principal Trumpet, Hendricks Symphony (Avon, IN)
Arranger/Composer; Lilly Music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LittleRusty
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 12656
Location: Gardena, Ca

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope no one thought my additions to the verification experiment was meant to imply anything negative about the blueprinting process.

I am an engineer by trade and predisposition. I have an innate desire to validate and the suggestion in the post by TrumpetMD caught my fancy.

I have used Osmun's services in the past and am happy with the result. I have only one complaint. That complaint is that it costs too much to get my horn across the country to have them work on it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TrumpetMD
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 2412
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleRusty wrote:
I hope no one thought my additions to the verification experiment was meant to imply anything negative about the blueprinting process.

I am an engineer by trade and predisposition. I have an innate desire to validate and the suggestion in the post by TrumpetMD caught my fancy.

Absolutely.

Mike
_________________
Bach Stradivarius 43* Trumpet (1974), Bach 6C Mouthpiece.
Bach Stradivarius 184 Cornet (1988), Yamaha 13E4 Mouthpiece
Olds L-12 Flugelhorn (1969), Yamaha 13F4 Mouthpiece.
Plus a few other Bach, Getzen, Olds, Carol, HN White, and Besson horns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TKSop
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 23 Feb 2014
Posts: 1735
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleRusty wrote:
I hope no one thought my additions to the verification experiment was meant to imply anything negative about the blueprinting process.


Likewise, my inquisitive side lead me to thinking about how you could test it - not because I doubt that it makes a different (on the contrary - it seems logical that it would make an improvement) but because I'm naturally curious about testing things and providing proof for things....

And as I said, I would expect the blueprinted horns to perform significantly better in that test than their non-blueprinted counterparts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TrumpetMD
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 2412
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TKSop wrote:
Likewise, my inquisitive side lead me to thinking about how you could test it - not because I doubt that it makes a different (on the contrary - it seems logical that it would make an improvement) but because I'm naturally curious about testing things and providing proof for things....


Agreed. Same here.

Mike
_________________
Bach Stradivarius 43* Trumpet (1974), Bach 6C Mouthpiece.
Bach Stradivarius 184 Cornet (1988), Yamaha 13E4 Mouthpiece
Olds L-12 Flugelhorn (1969), Yamaha 13F4 Mouthpiece.
Plus a few other Bach, Getzen, Olds, Carol, HN White, and Besson horns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James Becker
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2827
Location: Littleton, MA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If any of you would like to book a same day appointment for blueprinting and show up in person I'll gladly let you play test your trumpet every step of the way.

I remember Andy Lott's visit where we did one adjustment at a time then let him play test his Bach C trumpet after each step. Phillip Chase Hawkins was present in the room as Andy play tested. The two of them looked at each other with amazement after each progressive adjustment. Having heard it with my own ears and receiving their positive feedback confirmed the validity of each adjustment.

It's time to finish my lunch and get back to restoring the valves of a 50 year old Bach Stradivarius. I've gotta go get some work done!
_________________
James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com

Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Heim
Veteran Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 181

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jim when did you start doing this "blueprinting"?

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Louise Finch
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 10 Aug 2012
Posts: 5464
Location: Suffolk, England

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

James Becker wrote:
If any of you would like to book a same day appointment for blueprinting and show up in person I'll gladly let you play test your trumpet every step of the way.

Hi James

If I only lived in the US, I'd love to take you up on your offer. Maybe one day I'll have the money to visit the US again. Next time I visit, it will be with my Bach trumpet in hand.

Take Care

Lou


I remember Andy Lott's visit where we did one adjustment at a time then let him play test his Bach C trumpet after each step. Phillip Chase Hawkins was present in the room as Andy play tested. The two of them looked at each other with amazement after each progressive adjustment. Having heard it with my own ears and receiving their positive feedback confirmed the validity of each adjustment.

It's time to finish my lunch and get back to restoring the valves of a 50 year old Bach Stradivarius. I've gotta go get some work done!

_________________
Trumpets:
Yamaha 8335 Xeno II
Bach Strad 180ML/37
B&H Oxford
Kanstul F Besson C
Yamaha D and D/Eb
- James R New Custom 3Cs
Flugel:
Bach Strad 183 - Bach 3CFL
Cornets:
Yamaha Neo + Xeno
Bach Strad 184ML
B&H Imperial
- Kanstul Custom 3Cs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andy Cooper
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 15 Nov 2001
Posts: 1825
Location: Terre Haute, IN USA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could you quantify the process?

Maybe. A few years ago Smith-Watkins published some work showing how to use a computer to identify variations in the bore of trumpets. (I think there was an example of IDing a solder blob in a Yamaha trumpet.)

You could run the experiment before, then after the process and compare the output. Then compare it with the shop list of modifications made. Here's another Masters thesis for someone.

Try searching for

fourier transform and smith-watkins and trumpet acoustics

It may have been an article in ITG - 20 years or so ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group