View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jml614 New Member
Joined: 19 Feb 2017 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:05 pm Post subject: Schilke 17D4D |
|
|
I need a bit of advice on if this mouthpiece will be good endurance wise
I'm currently playing with a DCA mini corps, and I play 3rd Soprano. Now I know the Number 4 rim on the 17 D4D is perfect for me. But bieng as I haven't played since 2010, will this mouthpiece cause endurance issues?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gstump Heavyweight Member
Joined: 14 Nov 2006 Posts: 934
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That mouthpieces a bathtub. _________________ Schilke B5
Couesnon Flug (1967)
Funk Brothers Horn Section/Caruso Student |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy Cooper Heavyweight Member
Joined: 15 Nov 2001 Posts: 1830 Location: Terre Haute, IN USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you feel you must use a cup that deep, consider the 17D4 with the standard backbore. The 17D4d is really pretty open and dark sounding - nothing to hold you back if you push yourself louder than your chops are ready for. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vin DiBona Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Dec 2003 Posts: 1473 Location: OHare area
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A 17D4 is Schilke's equivalent to a Bach 2 1/2C.
Schilke's standard backbore is a little more open that the Bach 10, so as mentioned, a 17D4 may be a good choice.
I played a 17D4d for a time and it isn't "that" big.
RT |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jml614 New Member
Joined: 19 Feb 2017 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well right now I'm practicing on a Yamaha 11C4, and it sounds pretty tight.
I played on a 17D4D at the Schilke factory in Chicago, and it really matched my sound. Thanks for the info. I feel the more open sound would be better. Not worried about range yet, comes with time and practice. If I hit High "Cs" I'm pretty lucky anyway, lol. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|