View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
the chief Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 Posts: 1438 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 4:56 pm Post subject: Shorter valve strokes |
|
|
I know the V1 has them, but I'm not a fan of that horn. I noticed that Wayne Bergeron's horn also has shorter valve strokes.
Is this a rare technique? Has it been done on any other horns? I personally think it's a good idea. _________________ "Your mind is your kingdom; that's where you exist" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill Bryant Heavyweight Member
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 1570 Location: Rapid City, SD
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some horns only appear to have short strokes, either by the optical illusion caused by finger buttons with bigger diameters or by metal that comes up higher than the spot where the button goes down to. I researched this earlier and it turned out that most makes have very similar stroke length.
Early Benge instruments had a longer stroke than most (especially the CG model) and a few companies had a slightly shorter stroke, but none can escape what happens when you make it seriously shorter while keeping the piston the same diameter: port tubing interference and distortion. Only one company I know of addresses the issue by making the piston diameter larger. I think it's called Wedgewood, or something like that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill Bryant Heavyweight Member
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 1570 Location: Rapid City, SD
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had a Kanstul 1600 in my home last month for several days and I didn't notice a shorter stroke. I did notice wide diameter finger buttons. Maybe your horn was different. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill Bryant Heavyweight Member
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 1570 Location: Rapid City, SD
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just looked at the pics on the Wild Thing website and this horn appears to be built around a standard Kanstul valve cluster. I don't see a short throw here at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the chief Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 Posts: 1438 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I agree the standard 1600 doesn't have them, but I can see that Wayne's definately does. There's a video of him playing with the Big Phat Band, and the strokes are very short, even when compared to a V1. _________________ "Your mind is your kingdom; that's where you exist" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill Bryant Heavyweight Member
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 1570 Location: Rapid City, SD
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
the chief Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 Posts: 1438 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't played most of those horns Bill, but the V1's strokes are definately shorter than normal. _________________ "Your mind is your kingdom; that's where you exist" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jsmn4vu Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Jul 2004 Posts: 747 Location: Fayetteville, GA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the chief wrote: | I haven't played most of those horns Bill, but the V1's strokes are definately shorter than normal. |
You understand that the minimum stroke in all conventional valves is the distance between the tops or bottoms of matching piston ports, right? _________________ John Miller
Peachtree Wind Ensemble |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the chief Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2003 Posts: 1438 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know the technical details, but that makes sense to me John. _________________ "Your mind is your kingdom; that's where you exist" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TimBrown Heavyweight Member
Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 742 Location: Galesburg Illinois
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Before I purchased my Kanstul CHI1070, I played a CHI1001. It definitely had shorter valve throws. My 1070 does not.
Tim _________________ Getzen 900 DLX
Kanstul Meha .470
L.A. Benge 3x+ 9879
1912 Holton New Proportion cornet
Kanstul CCF 925 flugel
King 1122 MFH
10 out of 10 people die. Do you consider yourself to be a good person? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
plankowner110 Heavyweight Member
Joined: 12 Jun 2003 Posts: 3620
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The piston stroke on my 60s Conn 38B and 8B was shorter than other trumpets. I think Conn accomplished this because the bore was smaller (.438) and they designed the ports closer together. _________________ C. G. Conn 60B Super Connstellation
Getzen 800S Eterna cornet
Bach 5C (Jens Lindemann is right)
https://www.trumpetherald.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26763 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tempo-rary Veteran Member
Joined: 05 Apr 2005 Posts: 232
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:41 am Post subject: Re: Shorter valve strokes |
|
|
the chief wrote: | .......shorter valve strokes.........I personally think it's a good idea. |
Chief, please elaborate. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NMex Heavyweight Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 567 Location: New Mexico
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | You understand that the minimum stroke in all conventional valves is the distance between the tops or bottoms of matching piston ports, right?
|
This does have to be measured vertically (as the piston travels). But does it allow for the ports to be displaced horizontally, thereby reducing the vertical travel?
Regards,
NMex _________________ Brasspire 923 LT
ACB TA-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tootsall Heavyweight Member
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 2952
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
All this talk about short valve strokes.... has anyone actually MEASURED to see what the valve stroke is? Or how (in)significant it can be?
It's easy... just stand a machinists rule vertically above a valve and note the measurement "valve up" and "valve down" (measuring at the edge of the valve button) and take the difference. No need to even pull the valve out of the casing.
You will be amazed, possibly even shocked at how small the difference can be.
I measured a Bauerfine valve block and a Schilke. They differ by 0.5 mm. That's two one-hundredths of an inch. Kind of "insignificant" I'd say. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jsmn4vu Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Jul 2004 Posts: 747 Location: Fayetteville, GA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
NMex wrote: | This does have to be measured vertically (as the piston travels). But does it allow for the ports to be displaced horizontally, thereby reducing the vertical travel? |
You'd think so, but in conventional valve designs, there will always need to be a pair of ports along the same vertical line (there have to be valve ports lined up with the input and output ports of the valve cylinder in both the up and down positions). Another limiting factor is how close ports can be spaced vertically, because of interference between the tubes in the valve body. Even now, they often have bumps in them for clearance. _________________ John Miller
Peachtree Wind Ensemble
Last edited by jsmn4vu on Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tootsall Heavyweight Member
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 2952
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
"valve up - valve down" = valve stroke.
Richie, you mentioned the short valve stroke on Yamaha and your Conn. What where the physical measurements?
I got Bauerfine at 14.5 mm and Schilke at 15.0. I think I remember my Eterna 800 cornet as being 15.5 but I'd have to go home and recheck them to be certain.
Last edited by Tootsall on Thu Apr 28, 2005 12:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jsmn4vu Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Jul 2004 Posts: 747 Location: Fayetteville, GA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just measured the stroke on a Kanstul ZKT1500 with a machinist's dial gauge. It's
.608 in.
or
15.443 mm _________________ John Miller
Peachtree Wind Ensemble |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LittleRusty Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 12663 Location: Gardena, Ca
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
jsmn4vu wrote: | NMex wrote: | This does have to be measured vertically (as the piston travels). But does it allow for the ports to be displaced horizontally, thereby reducing the vertical travel? |
You'd think so, but in conventional valve designs, there will always need to be a pair of ports along the same vertical line (there has to be a valve port lined up with the input and output ports of the valve cylinder in both the up and down positions). Another limiting factor is how close ports can be spaced vertically, because of interference between the tubes in the valve body. Even now, they often have bumps in them for clearance. |
The number of vertically paired ports should not affect the distance the piston needs to travel. Think of it this way, in order for the valve to open the pipe the port on the valve must line up with the port on the tubing.
Also ports for the intake and exhaust from the tubing must both be lined up when the valve is open.
So the maximum the valve must travel, in this simple example, is the diameter of one port.
Perhaps the effect you are describing is due to the needing to switch the incoming air stream from diverting to the extra tubing or passing it on to the next valve or bell? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jsmn4vu Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Jul 2004 Posts: 747 Location: Fayetteville, GA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
LittleRusty wrote: | Think of it this way, in order for the valve to open the pipe the port on the valve must line up with the port on the tubing. |
Yes. But instead of "open" or "closed," it's probably better to think of "straight through " or "diverted" (valve up or valve down). The valve is always open in one direction or another.
LittleRusty wrote: | Also ports for the intake and exhaust from the tubing must both be lined up when the valve is open. |
Down, I think you mean. But keep in mind that intake and exhaust must also both be aligned when the valve is UP, therefore...
LittleRusty wrote: |
So the maximum the valve must travel, in this simple example, is the diameter of one port. |
PLUS the width of metal between the two (invariably) vertically adjoining ports on the piston. _________________ John Miller
Peachtree Wind Ensemble |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LittleRusty Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 12663 Location: Gardena, Ca
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, the vertically aligned ports are the intake for either the extended tubing or the pass-through port, where the air is diverted to.
Yes, that would explain your point.
Sorry, I knew I was missing something, I should have thought of that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|