• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

The Crusade Against Pedal Notes


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Donald S. Reinhardt
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bill Bryant
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 1570
Location: Rapid City, SD

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was a long-time Claude Gordon student. I hope my comments about pedal tones are not offensive here.

IMO, pedals are totally useless unless they are completely connected to the 'normal' notes using the same flexible embouchure. I do not count a pedal tone as worth a dime unless I can play it and my highest note without re-setting my chops. BTW my pedal C is perfectly in tune and sounds huge and resonant and is completely connected to the rest of my range.

Here's my theory. I may be wrong. In order to connect the very lowest notes with the rest of your range, the pedals must be played with as much flesh inside the mpc as possible. If a lot of flesh has to work its way out of the mpc before pedal will sound, it means that the lips don't vibrate easily. When you get a big fat pedal C happening, using your normal embouchure, it means that you are getting lots and lots of easy, big vibration inside a tiny space while keeping lots of flesh still inside there.

Well, I think we can all agree that getting lots of flesh inside the mpc while keeping an easy vibration and not choking off is the goal of playing high. At least that's one way of looking at it. So what I do when I play pedals is train myself not to spread my chops, even at the very bottom, so that I have a very closed yet very vibrant 'set' up high.

I've heard countless trumpeters playing horrible sounds down low and somehow thinking this will give them high notes. The kind of pedals that will give you high notes, if you can do them (and perhaps for many it's impossible and hence the controversy), is the kind that is actually just another octave or so playable range that you don't distort to get down to, that you play in tune with good sound, that you play with all your lip still in there, that you play with resonance.

It's too late to edit this and see if it makes sense. I have to teach tomorrow. Good luck to you all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
KingSilverSonic
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 1432
Location: Dubuque, Iowa

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's is my take based on my limited understanding of pedal tones. I also note that I got into this initially by clicking on "Latest Trumpet Forums:" and had never heard of Reinhardt until now. I certainly had no position that I was attempting to push, but was simply giving my opinion.

I started practicing pedals after reading about Claude Gordon, and then purchasing his books. For me, one thing that I noticed was that as I practiced pedal tones I began to have more control over my trumpet. I related this to flying. When I was getting my private license I spent hours in slow flight and in steep turns. The purpose of this was not to prepare me to go cross-country at a speed just a hair above stall speed but to teach me to be able to control the aircraft at a very slow speed. Same with steep turns. When I started doing these I got disoriented, couldn't control the aircraft and once even vomited. But, with a lot of practice I can now do them if necessary. As mentioned, I began to notice that I was gaining more control over my trumpet when I practiced pedal tones. For me, the more control I have over this instrument the better player I will be. I do not view pedal tones as "the" magic bullet to make me the best player in the universe, and I will likely not give a concert in the pedal range . But, I will continue to practice them just as I will go out and practice slow flight and steep turns to make me a better, and safer, pilot.
_________________
Richard

Burbank Benge Bb
Burbank Benge C
King Silver Sonic Cornet
King Silver Sonic Symphony 20 DB
Lawler flugelhorn
Member: Bugles Across America
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
airdyn
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 07 Feb 2003
Posts: 512

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:08 am    Post subject: Re: The Crusade Against Pedal Notes Reply with quote

[quote="airdyn"]
Quote:
Maynard said that playing t-bone had the same effect on his trumpet chops as practicing pedal tone -- relaxed air passages, big volume, carefull listening to pitch. He said that he didn't use pedals because he got the same benefit from the 'bone.


First of all, with this initial post of mine on this volitile subject, I wish to thank Rich Willey for being so tolerant of the many posts following.

I am an Embouchure Consultant and when Dr. Reinhardt passed away I reluctantly assumed this title. In 1989 I was flooded with students that were "midstream" so to speak with Doc and wanted me to continue where he was working with them. Others came to me in the ensuing years to continue their work with Doc or were new students just wishing to learn about the Pivot System.

When a student comes to me for the first time, I question him/her on his goals and then proceed to document all I can see on an Analysis Form of their physical make-up...teeth size, teeth high spots, slant of teeth, mouth cavity (high, wide, low),tongue length and breadth, how they use the tongue to slur, sustain and articulate, their grip, their right hand position, their posture both standing and sitting, where the mouthpiece is place in relation to center, the horn angle, the direction of their airstream and then their particular type based on the pivot they come in with. A pivot test is in order here to make sure they are using the right one and then I know their true type, not always the type they come in with.
Other things are checked that I won't go into now, like their breathing method, for instance, and then I ask them "Why did you come to see me?" The ones with problems (the majority) tell me what their problems are and I ask them (knowing the answer most of the time) "Do you use Pedal Notes in your daily practice?" I can honestly say that, just as Doc experienced, one of the top reasons for their problems, big or small, I have found to be Pedal Note Practices. Now this is just me and what I find. No heresay here or preaching. When Wittgenstein said he came here "To a World as I found it", I can only say that eliminating the pedal practice is what I do to clear up problems and "it is how I find them" when they come to me.
This is just what I do and what I find. Whether you believe pedal notes are right or wrong, you are right? A belief is hard to argue with.

Trust everyone reads this in good faith and stays cool.

Dave S.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pops
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2002
Posts: 1485
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

.

Rich, Dave, Chris...



I think that one thing that might be helpful here is if one of you explained how you see pedals destroying an embouchure.

Yes I can and did look at the check list but I think that detailing what a yes answer in each question really means would be helpful to some of those questioning your viewpoint.


i.e.
Dropping the jaw to play the pedals.
Well if they place a finger on their lips (at rest) and drop the jaw they will feel the lips pull apart and the lower lip get thinner. If we think about how the mouthpiece tries to hold the lips in place then it is easy to see how this action makes it hard to play back into the normal or upper register without resetting the embouchure.


There are some answers here that border on "because "Doc" said so". That is a very 1950 idea. In years past children were brought up to NOT question but that was then and this is now. I really think some of the problems in this thread and I KNOW some of the problems between you and me in the past were centered around this issue.

I think Mr. Reinhardt was a brilliant brass teacher but I also think that explaining WHY he didn't like pedals... doesn't lessen his legacy. I think that the reasons are sound and when given would add immeasurably to this. I also think that this is what PH was alluding to in his post here.


Pops

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
mcgowanm
Regular Member


Joined: 20 Nov 2004
Posts: 55
Location: michigan

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why do baseball players warm-up with a weight on their bat? Why do golfers stretch with the golf club behind their back? Why do hockey players ride exercise bikes? Why do athletes now a days do more and more training than before using machine and/or exercise other than their sport?

I think it is absurd to say that a mouthpiece can only be used one way or you can't re-focus back to playing the trumpet. Pedal tones (even pedal tone slides ACROSS the lips) have help me tremendously is maintaining flexibility during weeks of 8 shows a week playing touring broadway shows or weeks of playing with a major symphony orchestra.

Would I assign them to a kid?? no

But they have provided chop-problem-free YEARS of playing even with demanding schedules.
_________________
mike mcgowan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
razeontherock
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 05 Jun 2004
Posts: 7487
Location: The land of GR and Getzen

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I look forward to answers to Pop's questions.

I could also add a list of benefits I get from playing pedals that violate the (seemingly good) principles set forth in the post just before Pop's last post, but I'll refrain here for now, for thread integrity, except to state that it quickly combats excess tension very well.

I think this whole issue deserves to be thought through on an individual basis ...

Ray
_________________
"And this is life: that you know the Son, and the One who sent Him." The rest is just details
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
airdyn
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 07 Feb 2003
Posts: 512

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pops wrote:


There are some answers here that border on "because "Doc" said so". That is a very 1950 idea. In years past children were brought up to NOT question but that was then and this is now. I really think some of the problems in this thread and I KNOW some of the problems between you and me in the past were centered around this issue.



Pops

.


Pops, I think that many other teachers who said TO play pedal tones also had/have followers "because they said so", like Adams, Caruso, Gordon, Maggio, et al. I will make my list of WHY's to NOT use them and post them at a later time. I did, however wish to clear up this issue with you as to "because they said so" thing. They must have had reasons and explanations why they work and I for one would love to know these reasons. Reinhardt was challenged many times by me on his points, but on one, Pedal Tones, I was in complete agreement. My personal experience with the pedal note players have convinced me of this and I will also state some of those experiences with my future posts.
I do appreciate what you do and respect your ideas.
Dave S.

As an aside, I am a child/adult of the 50's and can only say that today's promiscuity is quite alarming. My disciplines from those days have helped me tremendously and now, what is going on in our school systems? I am so grateful for my early teachers that I truly trusted and respected I and could do things "because they said so" with confidence, and one such was Reinhardt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
308WIN
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 18 Jan 2002
Posts: 1626
Location: Waldorf MD

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, but what other changes have been made that could have contributed to improvement? I mean surely eliminating pedals is not the only thing being changed. Also, another factor is that any sort of change of routine can have drastic effects on playing. For many of these students improvement would have been likely whether pedals were continued or not.

I would be interested to see what effect it would have on several players (pedal players) if they ONLY stopped pedals and changed NOTHING else in their routine.

I believe Schlossberg used the adage "a few drops will heal, and a spoonful will kill" (or something to that effect). There are many technical excercises that are like this, be it too much loud practice, too much soft, etc.

In my warmup, I use pedals for a MAX of about 2 minutes. That's it. I find it helps stimulate blood flow to the muscles (particularly the chin area).

Quote:
Whether you believe pedal notes are right or wrong, you are right? A belief is hard to argue with.


Agreed, but then practice what you preach.
_________________
كافر

9/11/01 Never forget those who died. Never forget those who killed them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
trumpetart
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 684
Location: Cotati, CA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KingSilverSonic wrote:

When I started doing these I got disoriented, couldn't control the aircraft and once even vomited.


Fine, but have you ever vomited from practicing pedal tones?
_________________
Daniel Gianola-Norris
My album, "Food of Love" is available on iTunes or CDbaby:
www.cdbaby.com/cd/foodoflove
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Pops
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2002
Posts: 1485
Location: Dallas

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

.

Hi Dave;

My first teacher was a student of Clarke. Believe me "Because I say so" was BIG.

I am NOT saying it is wrong. I just think that WHY isn't a bad question. I am glad to see you think so too.

I could tell from the tone of earlier posts that you would be open to WHY.

I have some whys as to NOT using pedals. I am interested to hear ones based on Reinhardts teachings. It will be very informative and I will of course steal the info and spread it.
I try to always remember to give credit to the original source.


I tell you what. I will go into the CG forum and ask WHY there. Not HOW, just WHY. Maybe they will be willing to field that question as well.



I agree with you about some of the things going on in schools and it bothers me as well.


Have a great afternoon.

Pops
.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Derek Reaban
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 08 Jul 2003
Posts: 3851
Location: Tempe, Arizona

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

airdyn,

In response to a message from Pops you wrote:
Quote:

They [Adams, Caruso, Gordon, Maggio] must have had reasons and explanations why they work and I for one would love to know these reasons.


There is at least one player / teacher that you left off your list, and I think it’s worthwhile to mention his ideas during this discussion. This is a post that I wrote early this year and posted in the Stamp forum. I personally don’t subscribe to any one “school” of teaching, but I try to adapt what makes sense to my own playing based on sufficient time with a given idea. In this light, I think the “why” that is found in the attached message as well as the “how” are very valid. Also, I would answer NO to the 10 questions mentioned early in this topic based on my current approach to pedals.

Quote:

I’ve recently started working with the method book by Pierre Thibaud from Rob Roy MacGregor’s publishing company and his description of the “why” behind pedal practice is the best that I have seen. When approaching the pedal F for the first time, he says, “A lot of work has to be put into achieving this note [with the first valve only]. This is because it is precisely this action which produces the thickening of the lip tissue which protects the lips from mouthpiece pressure.”

I discovered just recently that I have been playing into the pedal register wrong for probably 20+ years now (my instructor had a similar realization after some lessons with Rob MacGregor). The point of the pedals is not simply to play them. The point is to begin with your middle embouchure setting and slowly “stretch” down to the pedals and then return to the normal playing register.

These words also really helped me from Chris Gekker’s “Notes on Practicing”. He says, “Don’t pucker the lips to produce these notes and don’t “bark” from pedal C downward, trying to get these pitches in tune. Intonation will correct itself with patient practice and playing these tones too loudly will forfeit many of the benefits. Try to imitate the sound of the baritone horn.”

I was certainly guilty of “barking” and I could play some really great sounding pedals. Man!! Talk about missing the boat! The pedals must connect to the middle embouchure setting!

Thibaud mentions that the student (while performing the pedals correctly), may experience “trembling” at first when playing down to the F just below F# at the bottom of the horn. This is natural! If the F is extremely difficult to play, try playing an F# arpeggio down to the low F#, but finger the low F# with second valve (acting as a pedal). Make sure that maintaining the middle register setting is the priority which will allow you to return to the normal register of the horn. This is the true key and the benefits will be well worth the effort. I think Rob MacGregor mentions that this work can take up to 6 months to see real benefits (the false pedals from F down to pedal C). Be patient and be persistent. Return to the regular playing register frequently when playing pedals to connect this sound back with the “middle setting”.

Players talk about using lot's of air to support the pedal register. Here’s another “danger zone” relating to the barking comment from Gekker. Take a full relaxed breath and simply “let” the air out. Don’t blow harder to get the sound to respond. That will kill the benefits of this work. If the sound starts to tremble because you are entering this register for the first time, that’s OK. Blowing harder might seem like the right action to get the sound to “open up”, but it will only lead you down the wrong path. The trembling will subside soon enough, and by “letting” the sound happen, your sound production in all registers will take on tangible benefits that will not be found by simply “barking”. With full lungs, the air will come out on it’s on and have plenty of support. This is another VERY important point of these exercises from my perspective.

I’m sure this is in line with Stamp and I hope it’s helpful to you.


I’m guessing that the percentage of players that approach pedal tones in the manner that Thibaud describes is very small. For those of you that experimented with Pedals prior to studying with Dr. Reinhardt, did you play them as Thibaud described, or did you approach them in a way that would lead you to answer YES to one of the 10 questions summarized by Rich on Page 2?
_________________
Derek Reaban
Tempe, Arizona
Tempe Symphonic Wind Ensemble / Symphony of the Southwest
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
TrumpetAce
Veteran Member


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 176
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paging Mr. Hollywood. I'm sure a lot of us would like you to jump in here.

T.A.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
308WIN
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 18 Jan 2002
Posts: 1626
Location: Waldorf MD

PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to add to Derek's post. Chris is who taught me how to play pedals..
_________________
كافر

9/11/01 Never forget those who died. Never forget those who killed them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Derek Reaban
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 08 Jul 2003
Posts: 3851
Location: Tempe, Arizona

PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was curious to see if I could find out why Reinhardt adopted the phrase:

"Positively no pedal tones on trumpet while under my tutelage."


I looked in the Encyclopedia of the Pivot System and found the story that I think led to this idea and think it’s worth including here:

From Page 8 in the Appendix:
Quote:

Case V

Many years ago, back in Sousa’s time, a well-known cornet virtuoso accidentally discovered that by daily practice of sustained, fortissimo, chromatically descending pedal tones (from the pedal “C” on down) with various modes of articulation, the extreme upper tones became playable, at least momentarily. After exhaustive experimentation, however, he found that this “falsetto-type high register” was extremely short lived. After this time the register would return to less than normal.

One of my eighteen instructors related such a pedal tone case. The performer, however, had lasted for a year and a half before the register reduction became apparent. The pedal tone theory calls upon enormous amounts of embouchure vibrating area to respond in a very slow, relaxed fashion for the various pedal tones being played. The embouchure formation is then supposed to be capable of tremendous pinching or pucker power for the much tenser, more rapid vibrations of the extreme upper register of the cornet or trumpet. In some cases this immediate upper register response (directly following the pedal tone practice) did result in the playing of a few “falsetto” high tones; however, the results were nil after a few attempts.

Even now we have some of the pedal tone instructors, and each one claims to be the first. I might say that this so-called method was in the books long before any of these gentlemen were born. It is true that they have added to the exercises in the pedal register and have systematized the procedure; however, I can assure you that eventually the net result will be the same as when it was introduced over 60 years ago.



Earlier, AverageJoe (Paul) wrote:
Quote:

I also practice the pedals pianissimo, not FF like Maggio. Response and alignment are my goals, then taking those two things into the rest of the range.


This is similar to what I mentioned in my post (ideas from Thibaud and Gekker) about avoiding “barking” or playing in this range too loudly. I’m guessing a player that eased into the pedal register gradually, allowing the “trembling” phase to progress to one of more surety, and then eventually to comfortable mf – F dynamics, would be a poor model to a player new to these.

The possibility for damage to a player who would try to take the shortcut to playing in the pedal register with a loud dynamic right from the beginning certainly seems a valid concern. This would justify Dr. Reinhardt’s reluctance to using pedals based on the stories that he had heard, and probably from the first hand experience that he saw in trumpet players who approached pedals “incorrectly”.

I hope this is appropriate for this forum and if not please delete it.
_________________
Derek Reaban
Tempe, Arizona
Tempe Symphonic Wind Ensemble / Symphony of the Southwest
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
airdyn
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 07 Feb 2003
Posts: 512

PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Derek Reaban wrote:
I was curious to see if I could find out why Reinhardt adopted the phrase:

"Positively no pedal tones on trumpet while under my tutelage."


I looked in the Encyclopedia of the Pivot System and found the story that I think led to this idea and think it’s worth including here:

From Page 8 in the Appendix:
Quote:

Case V

Many years ago, back in Sousa’s time, a well-known cornet virtuoso accidentally discovered that by daily practice of sustained, fortissimo, chromatically descending pedal tones (from the pedal “C” on down) with various modes of articulation, the extreme upper tones became playable, at least momentarily. After exhaustive experimentation, however, he found that this “falsetto-type high register” was extremely short lived. After this time the register would return to less than normal.

One of my eighteen instructors related such a pedal tone case. The performer, however, had lasted for a year and a half before the register reduction became apparent. The pedal tone theory calls upon enormous amounts of embouchure vibrating area to respond in a very slow, relaxed fashion for the various pedal tones being played. The embouchure formation is then supposed to be capable of tremendous pinching or pucker power for the much tenser, more rapid vibrations of the extreme upper register of the cornet or trumpet. In some cases this immediate upper register response (directly following the pedal tone practice) did result in the playing of a few “falsetto” high tones; however, the results were nil after a few attempts.

Even now we have some of the pedal tone instructors, and each one claims to be the first. I might say that this so-called method was in the books long before any of these gentlemen were born. It is true that they have added to the exercises in the pedal register and have systematized the procedure; however, I can assure you that eventually the net result will be the same as when it was introduced over 60 years ago.



Earlier, AverageJoe (Paul) wrote:
Quote:

I also practice the pedals pianissimo, not FF like Maggio. Response and alignment are my goals, then taking those two things into the rest of the range.


This is similar to what I mentioned in my post (ideas from Thibaud and Gekker) about avoiding “barking” or playing in this range too loudly. I’m guessing a player that eased into the pedal register gradually, allowing the “trembling” phase to progress to one of more surety, and then eventually to comfortable mf – F dynamics, would be a poor model to a player new to these.

The possibility for damage to a player who would try to take the shortcut to playing in the pedal register with a loud dynamic right from the beginning certainly seems a valid concern. This would justify Dr. Reinhardt’s reluctance to using pedals based on the stories that he had heard, and probably from the first hand experience that he saw in trumpet players who approached pedals “incorrectly”.

I hope this is appropriate for this forum and if not please delete it.


Derek,
As a result of this post of yours, I am leaving the topic. Anything I have to say as to individual cases of what Doc talks about that i have personally encountered, I will answer by personal email only. I would have to name names in print of truly wonderful players who fall into the category that the Case V of the Encyclopedia Appendix refers to.
I can only personally thank you, Derek, for what I think rounds out this topic, for me , at least.
I wish to thank all who participated and if I may, to leave one analogy. There are many pieces to the puzzle of trumpet playing. Of all the "pictures and methods" that require many pieces to be complete, the Reinhardt one does not have that piece called Pedal Tones. Fortunately, or unfortunately, depending on each one's point of view, that's the way it is.
Dave S.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
BeboppinFool
Donald Reinhardt Forum Moderator


Joined: 28 Dec 2001
Posts: 5555
Location: AVL|NC|USA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From a TH topic called Doc Reinhardt's Thoughts on Pedal Tones from September 12 2002, posted by Mr.Hollywood (at that time his username was Hairy James) here in the Reinhardt Forum:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone who studied with Doc knows that on your first lesson he would tell you "Positively NEVER practice pedal tones while you are under my tutelage." Along with this he would usually tell you a story about Herbert L.Clarke. He said when he was very young that his father used to take him to hear the Sousa band featuring H.L.Clarke. He said that Clarke was always very gracious and loved children. One day while he was speaking to Clarke, he said he heard some very strange squeaks and flatulent sounds coming from a nearby tent. He asked Clarke, "Is that a cornet or a clarinet?" Clarke told him that it was a cornet player named Harold Stambaugh. Doc asked him what Harold was doing, making all those strange noises(pedal tones) on cornet. Clarke said that when Harold did that he could get a few high notes to come out immediately after his pedal work, but that when he got on the stand he had a lot of trouble tonguing.

When he finished telling his story Doc would comment, "That was thirty years before Maggio was kissing rosebuds in the coal mines of Italy and transplanted it to Hollywood." Meaning that pedal tones had been around way before Louis Maggio had brought them from Italy to Hollywood C.A in the 1940's.

Doc's main complaint about pedal tones was that they where produced without the all important legs of the inner embouchure, meaning in more simple terms that the pedal tone embouchure is too flabby, too rolled out and that there isn't enough mouthpiece pressure being used to stabilize the embouchure formation. All of this leads to tonguing problems and multiple embouchure formations.

Doc would tell me that the second he heard someone single tongue he could tell if they were a "pedal tone addict". Another problem with pedal tones is that the great majority of players are incapable of doing them without using two embochures. One of Doc's absolute rules was: ONE EMBOUCHURE ALL OVER THE HORN!

Despite all that I've said here, there are some pedal tone success stories, but you can be sure that they are all type IIIA's who posess very high mouthpiece placements. For all the rest of you lower placement types all I can say is........ BE CAREFUL. Chris
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I spoke to Chris on the phone today; he's been in Atlantic City all week without computer access, and would've enjoyed chiming in on this topic. I told him he had been mentioned, and he told me about this post which I looked up when I got home.

I'm sure this topic will resurface from time to time, and I'm sure that opposing forces on both sides of the pedal tone controversy will want to defend all that they know to be right and good.

My job here is to keep reminding people that this forum is for people to find out about the teachings of Dr. Donald S. Reinhardt, not a place for them to come in here and tell us how wrong we are and how perfect they are.
_________________
Rich Willey—Click here to hear my SoundCloud clips

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bill Bryant
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 1570
Location: Rapid City, SD

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with anyone who opposes pedals played with a differenct embouchure. I disagree with anyone who opposes pedals played with a normal embouchure, played in tune with a good sound, played as just another octave of notes totally connected to everything else. Just last night I was slurring arpeggios from pedal C up to high C and back down several times in one breath, making sure I played with a nice full sound on every note and making sure I played it all with one embouchure on one blow.

I support anyone who crusades against "pedal" tones done any other way--as splatty noises using trick settings, as sounds disconnected from the rest of the register, etc.

I oppose anyone who crusades against adding an octave of usable notes at the bottom of his range that are totally connected, not "trick" in the least, that can be tongued, slurred, and generally played like any other note.

Perhaps some embouchure formations make "my" kind of pedal playing impossible. With my embouchure--lips wet, mpc more on the top lip, pressure mostly on the top lip, airstream a bit down in the upper register, pretty much straight ahead in the low register, moving jaw--pedals are easily played as nothing more than a few more low notes.

Could it be that the pedal controversy is base on (1) different definitions/approaches to making low sounds and (2) different embouchures that either can or can't play low easily?

One of these days I'm gonna have to record my pedal arpeggios and put them up for the Rheinhart folks to analyze, along with photos of my face doing them. My lip doesn't roll out hardly at all down there. My face looks almost exactly the same on low C and pedal C. The only difference is that my jaw is a bit lower on the pedal C.

My best wishes to everyone, even those I disagree with. Let's keep this helpful and educational, not personal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Wilktone
Veteran Member


Joined: 25 Aug 2002
Posts: 462

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Short of running a longitudinal study of many trumpet players to produce a statistically viable pool of subjects, we can only speculate and offer anecdotal evidence. Anecdotal evidence in and of itself is difficult, because there are often other factors involved that aren't considered. For example:

Quote:
I practiced using Claude Gordon's method about 4 times each week, and about an hour for each practice session. I would do the pedal exercises, rest 20 minutes or so, then move to the second exercise which moved progressively into the high register, then to the third exercise. So, I practiced the three lessons at each practice session and was good for high D at the beginning. After about one month my range increased to high E, and sometimes F.

"When you stopped practicing out of the book did you still play the same number of notes High C and above and did you still play your highest possible note several times a day?" Good point. The answer is, and I hate to admit this after thinking about your question, probably not. I found that I needed to devote more time to practicing my music, rather than practicing with Mr. Gordon's exercises. Thus, my reason for "back-sliding."


As far as speculation goes, this also needs to be taken with a grain of salt, but if we apply the principles of logic we might be able to come to some common points of agreement here.

Many trumpet players have felt that practicing pedal tones has been helpful for them. Those that do and would like to offer your thoughts on this matter, I ask once again, what is it that you feel is helping? I don't just mean what aspect of your playing it helps (although that's important to consider), but what are the mechanics behind why that helps?

I recently asked a colleague this question while warming up for a pit gig. This friend, who I believe studied with Roy Stevens I, has great power and range. For those of you who understand Reinhardt's embouchure types, he is a IIIB. He stated that pedal tones simply help him relax, but he has to be careful to play the pedal tones in such a way that he can connect them to the higher register and he doesn't really practice them that much. I asked him to demonstrate.

Immediately I could see that he was puckering his lips and bringing them off his teeth. In Reinhardt's terminology, he wasn't able to maintain his embouchure "legs" when playing the pedals. The question here, then, is whether or not practice of this sort has a potential to be destructive to high range and clean attacks.

Quote:
Because my goal was to increase the elasticity of the lips within my usable embouchure, I was insistent that the setting not change in the pedal range. Therefore, I can answer NO to all 10 of these questions.


You may be correct here, Paul, but based on what I've seen when watching (admittedly a small number) trumpet players play pedal tones I have yet to see any successfully play pedal notes without doing one or more of those points. I've noticed that most of us have a great deal of difficulty actually being aware of the actual motor coordination we're using when playing and it really does take an observer to note things that we're used to doing. Please bear in mind that the embouchure "setting" to Reinhardt meant more than the position of the mouthpiece on the lips, but also the jaw, the position of the lips inside the mouthpiece, feeling the teeth behind the lips at the points where the rim contacts the lips, etc.

Quote:
Given the many great players who practice(d) pedal notes and attribute at least part of their playing success to the practice of pedal notes - great players such as Arturo Sandoval, Stan Mark, Paul Cacia, Frank Kaderabek, Claude Gordon, Louis Maggio (the list could go on and on) - anyone that makes the claim that pedal note practice is not a good thing to do is clearly mistaken.


True. The number of pedal tone advocates that play very well makes me think that this is a valuable topic to discuss with an open mind. One thing that I think is important to note, however, is that when you discuss truly extraordinary players like that you are already discussing exceptions. There are examples of players who puff their cheeks or smile to ascend or reset the mouthpiece on different parts of the lips for different ranges, but it is generally accepted that these are things best avoided, not so much for the immediate effect they have, but to avoid problems down the line. While pedal tones certainly won't have the same damaging affect that smoking has on an individual's health, I think Dave S.'s analogy here does help us realize that just because someone hasn't developed problems practicing pedal tones doesn't mean they won't later or that some people seem to have bad habits that never cause troubles.

Quote:
Well, I think we can all agree that getting lots of flesh inside the mpc while keeping an easy vibration and not choking off is the goal of playing high. At least that's one way of looking at it. So what I do when I play pedals is train myself not to spread my chops, even at the very bottom, so that I have a very closed yet very vibrant 'set' up high.


Bill, I'm afraid I don't agree with this. Or perhaps I misunderstand your point.

I have some video footage of a trombonist playing into a mouthpiece where a camera and strobe light had been placed. When the trombonist plays higher there appears to be the same amount of lip inside the mouthpiece, not more or less. What does change is the size of the aperture and the amount of lip surface area that actually vibrates.

It may be that some players need more pucker with their entire embouchure. From my experience, I've found that its much more common for players to play with too flabby an embouchure formation and actually need less "meat" inside the mouthpiece.

Quote:
As mentioned, I began to notice that I was gaining more control over my trumpet when I practiced pedal tones. For me, the more control I have over this instrument the better player I will be. I do not view pedal tones as "the" magic bullet to make me the best player in the universe, and I will likely not give a concert in the pedal range . But, I will continue to practice them just as I will go out and practice slow flight and steep turns to make me a better, and safer, pilot.


Quote:
Pedal tones (even pedal tone slides ACROSS the lips) have help me tremendously is maintaining flexibility during weeks of 8 shows a week playing touring broadway shows or weeks of playing with a major symphony orchestra.


Interesting. Assuming then that practicing pedal tones has at least a potential to be destructive to trumpet playing the question I'd want to know is if there are other things that trumpet players can do that have the same benefit without the potential for problems?

Quote:
I have some whys as to NOT using pedals. I am interested to hear ones based on Reinhardts teachings. It will be very informative and I will of course steal the info and spread it.
I try to always remember to give credit to the original source.


The main reason appears to be that pedal tone practice on the trumpet encourages an embouchure formation that is fundamentally different from the rest of the range. Please note, I am not just talking about the mouthpiece placement here, but the way the lips line up, horizontal jaw position, foundation of the teeth where the rim contacts with the lips, alignment of the lips inside the mouthpiece, and consistent pivot (please note that the "pivot" Reinhardt taught is not a tilting of the instrument, but the the sliding of the mouthpiece and lips as a single unit along the teeth - this is a motion that all brass players make to some degree or another and this has been shown to be true in several peer reviewed studies) . I've seen trumpet players play from pedal tones up to high G and above using the same mouthpiece placement, but never on what I would consider the same embouchure.

Reinhardt felt that consistent brass playing requires a consistent embouchure feel. He noted that when players utilized an inconsistent embouchure that many of these players developed problems, often not arising after years of successful playing. Other brass teachers have also noted that great players who play with mechanical procedures that are considered less than efficient typically don't develop problems until they are in their 30s and 40s. I'm guessing that Reinhardt decided that while pedal tones may offer some benefits, there were other things that could be done to achieve the same benefits that would avoid those potential problems. If those other things took longer for the goal then the delay was worth the avoidance of having to go back later.

Quote:
“A lot of work has to be put into achieving this note [with the first valve only]. This is because it is precisely this action which produces the thickening of the lip tissue which protects the lips from mouthpiece pressure.”


I've already commented a bit on this above, but I would also comment that it's not a thickening of lip tissue which protects the lips, but the strength and control to play the entire range of the instrument without resorting to excessive mouthpiece pressure.

Quote:
Thibaud mentions that the student (while performing the pedals correctly), may experience “trembling” at first when playing down to the F just below F# at the bottom of the horn. This is natural! If the F is extremely difficult to play, try playing an F# arpeggio down to the low F#, but finger the low F# with second valve (acting as a pedal). Make sure that maintaining the middle register setting is the priority which will allow you to return to the normal register of the horn. This is the true key and the benefits will be well worth the effort. I think Rob MacGregor mentions that this work can take up to 6 months to see real benefits (the false pedals from F down to pedal C). Be patient and be persistent. Return to the regular playing register frequently when playing pedals to connect this sound back with the “middle setting”.


Why is the "middle register setting" the important setting to connect? In my opinion, the ability to play in the upper register shows embouchure strength and control. If so, does it make more sense to bring that embouchure down to the middle and low register rather than the other way around?

Quote:
Perhaps some embouchure formations make "my" kind of pedal playing impossible. With my embouchure--lips wet, mpc more on the top lip, pressure mostly on the top lip, airstream a bit down in the upper register, pretty much straight ahead in the low register, moving jaw--pedals are easily played as nothing more than a few more low notes.


Without seeing you play in person, Bill, it's impossible to say, but what you describe here is consistent with Reinhardt's embouchure type IIIA, the very embouchure type that is said to be less likely to develop problems with pedal tones.

Out of curiosity, have any of the Reinhardt players/teachers out there ever worked with a IIIA trumpet player who developed problems as a result of practicing pedal tones? Perhaps pedal tones are like buzzing into the mouthpiece, something that some types simply can't do. Since Reinhardt certainly recognized that certain types needed to practice differently, I'm inclined to suspect that Reinhardt did indeed find that pedal tones had a tendency to cause troubles with IIIA players as well, but I don't know.

Quote:
Could it be that the pedal controversy is base on (1) different definitions/approaches to making low sounds and (2) different embouchures that either can or can't play low easily?


That may have something to do with it, but the IIIA embouchure often has trouble playing low easily, but often has an easy high range.

Quote:
One of these days I'm gonna have to record my pedal arpeggios and put them up for the Rheinhart folks to analyze, along with photos of my face doing them. My lip doesn't roll out hardly at all down there. My face looks almost exactly the same on low C and pedal C. The only difference is that my jaw is a bit lower on the pedal C.


Video footage, particularly from the side, would really be necessary to diagnose this. The jaw dropping to descend is one thing that I would caution you to avoid as well, because you're changing the foundation of your lower teeth behind your lower lip and instead of descending with embouchure compression and control you're essentially loosening your lips by pulling them apart. In other words, the embouchure form and function for pedal tones is distinctly different than for the rest of your range. Since I assume you don't raise your jaw to ascend from a G on top of the staff up to a high C or higher, why would you want to drop your jaw to descend from a G on the bottom of the staff into the pedal range? This goes back to practicing in such a way that your embouchure form and function is consistent across the entire range, assuming that you agree that this is important.

As far as wanting a side view of playing pedal tones, you need to be on the side to really see how much the pucker changes in the pedal tones. A view from the front (as when we watch ourselves play in the mirror) doesn't always provide the best angle for seeing that.


Dave W.
_________________
www.wilktone.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
oxleyk
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2289
Location: Glen Elyn, Illinois

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, going waaaay back to the original post, is it acceptable to use a trombone or trombone mouthpiece instead of doing pedals? That way the player isn't doing any contortions in order to play pedals.

Kent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill Bryant
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 1570
Location: Rapid City, SD

PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wilktone wrote:
The jaw dropping to descend is one thing that I would caution you to avoid as well


You're sounding pretty authoritative, there, sir. Are you sure you understand this better than I do? If so, how do you know it? I would caution you not to take up this tone so quickly with a person whose background is unknown to you. You may indeed know a lot more about this topic than I do--or maybe not.

(I was a student of Uan Rasey, John Clyman, and then long-term with Claude Gordon back in the 70s. I assume you know what these names mean. I'm not interested in swapping pedigrees here. That's not my point. I just want to make it clear to you that I'm not a college freshman.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Donald S. Reinhardt All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 4 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group