• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

King Golden Flair



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
trumpetart
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 726
Location: Cotati, CA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2017 9:18 am    Post subject: King Golden Flair Reply with quote

Can anyone point me towards information on King Golden Flair serial numbers? I have one with a serial number under 20, is it safe to assume it's some sort of prototype? Opposite the serial number is stamped PC, presumably for "Pete Candoli"
_________________
Daniel Gianola-Norris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rod Haney
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 937

PostPosted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would have been after 68 when HN white King
Was sold. I think it was early 70's. Site called hornucopia may help locate year exactly. I have a 67 silver flair and think the build and play are a bit better on white kings I've heard many say they thought it was a good horn. I think they had some changes on golden from the silver and I seem to remember bore size but I never dug into it too much. Supposedly more of a jazz vs lead type horn????
Rod
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chef8489
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 858
Location: Johnson City Tn

PostPosted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The golden flair did have a smaller bore than the Silver Flair. It was a KMI horn designer for Pete Candoli as he felt the birds 9n the Silver Flair were too large. I think they stopped making those in 1979. Uni released a remake later on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iiipopes
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2015
Posts: 555

PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes. I agree. The Golden Flair had a .458 bore instead of the Silver Flair .462 bore. It had the reverse slide, lightweight bell, and some other cosmetic differences. It is supposedly a very responsive horn. I had a chance to play one when I was in high school, but I don't really remember anything about it except that it was not different enough from Dad's Super 20 to make me want to switch, which may have been more of an emotional decision than a player's decision.
_________________
King Super 20 Trumpet; Sov 921 Cornet
Bach cornet modded to be a 181L clone
Couesnon Flugelhorn and C trumpet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jimmysmith76
Veteran Member


Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Location: Detroit, MI

PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use a Golden Flair as one of my main players. Fantastic horn! I would say you maybe have one of the prototype horns. What is the finish on yours? Where is golden flair engraved on the horn? Mine is silver. These are very rare horns, they were only produced for 4 years.

I copied this from a older post
“The King Golden Flair was quite different than the Silver Flair. It was constructed with different valve block, caps, braces, etc. It was a completely new design from the Silver Flair, and the project was initiated at the request of Pete Candoli. He was playing the Silver Flair (large bore horn) and needed a smaller bore with more compact sound for recording with strings and small ensembles. I am relaying the information exactly the way Pete told it to me.

The Golden Flair is rare because it had a short life. King Musical Instruments ended manufacturing of its complete trumpet line (Silver Flair, Golden Flair, Super-20 Symphony, Liberty, Tempo, and Cleveland Superior) in 1979 and came out with the 2000 Series pro trumpet and cornet line in 1980. This was the beginning of the end for King.”
_________________
Jimmy Smith
Trumpeter, Educator, Composer, Arranger
www.jimmysmithmusic.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
trumpetom2
Regular Member


Joined: 02 Feb 2017
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also have a King Golden Flair and I can approve that it is very responsive and has a pretty compact sound.
It needs less air and also plays very differently in comparison to a Silver Flair.
For BigBand I usually use the Silver Flair for any small group ensembles I prefer the Golden over the Silver Flair.

I'm happy to give you more information if needed.
_________________
HN White King Master Vocal C/Bb/A cornet - 1918
HN White King Silver Flair - 1965
Martin Committe Deluxe #3 - 1957
Couesnon Monopole Conservatoire Star - 1960s
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Goldplate
Veteran Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 152

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You guys are giving me a little King envy. I always wanted to try out a Golden Flair, but haven't ever seen one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grits Burgh
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 805
Location: South Carolina

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rich Ita had one in his shop for sale back in September (Marietta, GA). I don't know if it is still in the shop or not.

Warm regards,
Grits
_________________
Bach Stradivarius 37 (1971)
Schilke HC 1
Getzen 3810 C Cornet
King Master Bb Cornet (1945)
B&S 3145 Challenger I Series Flugelhorn
Life is short; buy every horn you want and die happy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trumpetom2
Regular Member


Joined: 02 Feb 2017
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunatelly they are quite rare. I guess I've only seen four or five.
_________________
HN White King Master Vocal C/Bb/A cornet - 1918
HN White King Silver Flair - 1965
Martin Committe Deluxe #3 - 1957
Couesnon Monopole Conservatoire Star - 1960s
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brassmusician
Veteran Member


Joined: 25 Feb 2016
Posts: 273

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I owned a Golden Flair for a year or so. I found it a tight horn to play. I found it hard to generate a lot of volume. Probably could have made it work better if I opened the throat on a mouthpiece or used a bigger backbore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Halflip
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 09 Jan 2003
Posts: 1924
Location: WI

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I own two, one in silver plate and one in gold-tinted lacquer. They are the best-playing horns I own (for me, anyway). Very lightweight, intimate and expressive tone, and very responsive. I think I read that King reverse-engineered Pete Candoli's Martin Committee and then made some interesting design tweaks. Charlie Melk (who worked on mine) said they have a very unique leadpipe configuration.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trumpetom2
Regular Member


Joined: 02 Feb 2017
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can confirm that the Golden Flair is indeed very very lightweight and very responsive.
My Handcraft Committee is also such a lightweight trumpet.
It's hard to tell which one feels lighter while holding both but I tend to say it's the HC Committee.

But the HC Committee is very different to the Golden Flair.
The sound on the Golden Flair is much more dense and focused compared to a Committee.
On the other side you have to work really hard and have the right mouthpiece to produce a Chet Baker'ish sound on a Golden Flair.
The Committee does this with so much ease.
I like to play the Golden Flair in classical music.
Especially for small ensembles or solo work with organ the Golden Flair is really reliable.
I wouldn't take my HC Committee for that kind of music.
The Committee likes to play jazz...

Moreover, I can't confirm that the Golden Flair plays thight.
I think it's quite free blowing with good resistance in the high register.
Of course it doesn't feel like a large bore trumpet.

Finally I have to say I wouldn't take any of them to a BigBand gig especially when playing lead.
Then I preferably use my King Silver Flair or the Liberty 3B.
_________________
HN White King Master Vocal C/Bb/A cornet - 1918
HN White King Silver Flair - 1965
Martin Committe Deluxe #3 - 1957
Couesnon Monopole Conservatoire Star - 1960s
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Halflip
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 09 Jan 2003
Posts: 1924
Location: WI

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

trumpetom2 wrote:
But the HC Committee is very different to the Golden Flair.
The sound on the Golden Flair is much more dense and focused compared to a Committee.
On the other side you have to work really hard and have the right mouthpiece to produce a Chet Baker'ish sound on a Golden Flair.
The Committee does this with so much ease.
I like to play the Golden Flair in classical music.
Especially for small ensembles or solo work with organ the Golden Flair is really reliable.
I wouldn't take my HC Committee for that kind of music.
The Committee likes to play jazz...


Your experience is interesting. For me, both of my Golden Flairs play lighter than my mid-50's vintage medium bore Martin Committee (which admittedly is not a Handcraft Committee). My Committee is very dark, while the Golden Flairs seem more flexible tonally. And for me, playing small ensemble jazz is 'easy as pie' on my Golden Flairs. I don't particularly try to sound like Chet Baker, but I find it very easy to create an intimate, expressive sound on either one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trumpetom2
Regular Member


Joined: 02 Feb 2017
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe I didn't use the term lighter correctly.
What I want to explain is that the HC Commitee plays broader or more voluminous and is less focused.
Since the Golden Flair seems to me more focused and more dense in the sound this broad dark feeling that the Committee has gets lost a little bit.

Maybe the terms 'lighter' got also mixed up considering the weight and playing characteristics.
I believe the HC Committee feels lighter concerning its weight.

To me I prefer a more dark, broad, less focuesd sound in a jazz combo.
And to me it's much easier to create an intimate sound on the HC Committee than on the Golden Flair.
That may be the less focused sound again but the HC Committee has a little better response at low volume than the GF.
My experience is that you can play really quiet and 'whisper' on the Committee much easier than on the GF.
I don't want to say that this can't be done on the GF either but to me it's easier and sounds better on the Committe.

Of course the mouthpiece takes also impact of how a trumpet sounds and responds.
_________________
HN White King Master Vocal C/Bb/A cornet - 1918
HN White King Silver Flair - 1965
Martin Committe Deluxe #3 - 1957
Couesnon Monopole Conservatoire Star - 1960s
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Halflip
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 09 Jan 2003
Posts: 1924
Location: WI

PostPosted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, trumpetom2, I guess we have different experiences and preferences.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group