View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Andy Del Heavyweight Member
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 2660 Location: sunny Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2020 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
PC wrote: | Greetings,
To complicate things wrt choice of rotaries, composer intentions and such, I recently learned that players in Brahms' time did not use natural instruments (horn and trumpet) but preferred their, by now, trusted valve instruments. I thought that Brahms intended the trumpet parts to be played on English slide trumpet, since all of his writing is essentially playable on natural trumpet except occasional flats, playable with the clock spring slide extended. This is also the case for Mendelssohn, but by the time Brahms came around, players had at their disposal technically superior valve instruments which they preferred to hand horn or slide trumpet. |
Well, not quite. But at the time of Brahms’ symphonies getting their first airing, valved instruments were available and being used. There were many players who used traditional instruments, however.
While conducting Brahms 2 a couple of years ago, I was introduced to a mezzoluna trumpet which has the provenance of being played on the second trumpet part at the premiere of that symphony. It was played using hand stopping to adjust pitches outside the normal harmonic series.
Did ALL players use this sort of instrument in the day? No, and I have no more information on this side of things. We do need to remember that Brahms wrote in a conservative manner when it came to a lot of his instrumental treatments, so his use of trumpets made the parts resemble a natural trumpet part a lot more his contemporaries May have. He was not a dummy, and knew full well what was possible in his day and how his players would react to parts. Much like Mahler would, hence the way HE wrote his parts.
There are many examples of music which looks like it was written for a natural or other instrument, and was not. A perfect example is Ravel’s Pavane pour en enfante defunte. The horn parts can be played on a hand horn. To do so may call into question one’s sanity!
Cheers
Andy _________________ so many horns, so few good notes... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PC Veteran Member
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 398 Location: Trondheim, Norway
|
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Andy for the info!
Yes, I had forgotten about the "demi-lune" trumpet... Years ago, I saw an original one on sale at an antique shop in Lyon. Did not have quite the cash to buy it at the time.
The result of using a hand-stopped trumpet would be a bit like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZ2IyoJIM_o
Cheers
Pierre |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy Del Heavyweight Member
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 2660 Location: sunny Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2020 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
PC wrote: | Thanks Andy for the info!
"demi-lune" trumpet...
Cheers
Pierre |
Ah yes, my interest pin cooking eating the results actually) mixed up the term... my bad! _________________ so many horns, so few good notes... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PC Veteran Member
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 398 Location: Trondheim, Norway
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy Del Heavyweight Member
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 2660 Location: sunny Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
It’s not too hard to get a handle on - in Wagner’s mind, and those at the time, a valve was, in a totally unauthentic term, an auto-crook. One could move from note to next note by crook, but it would involve stopping, changing crook, etc. But the new ‘auto-crook’ meant you can change without stopping....
AMAZING! (Well, not to us) but to the average Joe player of the day?
You get the drift...
Cheers
Andy _________________ so many horns, so few good notes... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aeijtzsche New Member
Joined: 15 May 2019 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 10:26 am Post subject: Re: F orchestral trumpet |
|
|
tootsweet wrote: |
Now here's a question I've always had about F trumpets and F trumpet parts:
WHY do we transpose UP (a fourth, say, on a C trumpet)? The F trumpet is a big boy, with the fundamental (surely) a 5th LOWER than the modern orchestral C, nicht? Why would the preferred ("normal") playing range be an octave higher than its natural realm of F3-F1? |
As for the question of where the F trumpets are, they are everywhere. I like to go look at the Met Museum's collection when I can, but they are not rare. That being said, many of them were cut down after the cornet-sized trumpet won the day. Kind of like 90% the gigantic tenor violas of the 1700s were cut way down so they are lost to the cultural imagination.
As for the question of notation and transposition, the answer lies in this part of your query: "...with the fundamental (surely) a 5th LOWER than the modern orchestral C..." The Low F trumpet is not really the father of the modern high C trumpet; it's a cousin. It is, in fact, a HIGH F trumpet compared to the (What we would call) very low C trumpets of the renaissance and baroque.
So if we think in terms of the partials we are playing on, it absolutely makes sense that the F trumpet sounds higher than it is written. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|