• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Trumpet and the Rule of Three


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Pedagogy
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kalijah
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 06 Nov 2003
Posts: 3212
Location: Alabama

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
That being said, if the embouchure is set correctly, your lips will want to buzz and your sound should not be forced.


If your lips are set correctly for the resonance of the instrument, they will create a tone in the instrument. Removing the PRIMARY resonance from the mouthpiece part of the instrument will rarely sustain a tone (a buzz) without increasing both the embouchure effort and the air effort.

Pitch-matching (ear training) on a mouthpiece provides the wrong embouchure muscle memory relative to playing the same pitches on the full instrument.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ProAm
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 932

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It does not necessarily require a lip "buzz" to create a note on a brass instrument. I can't do it on trumpet but on tuba, I can create a low note by blowing and fluttering my tongue. It is not a usable way to play, probably because it isn't possible to impart much energy to the standing wave, but it does sound like a low, quiet, tuba note without my lips being involved at all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stuartissimo
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 17 Dec 2021
Posts: 795
Location: Europe

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Getting a bit fed-up with your cherry picking and hair splitting so here’s my 2 cents on your replies.

kalijah wrote:
I have said many times before, if one would qualify the analogies as just that, then much contention could be avoided.

It’s obvious even to a non-native English speaker like me that the quote you disputed is an analogy. It literally contains the words ‘admittedly simplified’, uses the word ‘similar’ instead of ‘identical’ and it’s a comparison to a guitar. What more do you need: a neon sign flashing the word ‘analogy’?

kalijah wrote:
If your lips are set correctly for the resonance of the instrument, they will create a tone in the instrument. Removing the PRIMARY resonance from the mouthpiece part of the instrument will rarely sustain a tone (a buzz) without increasing both the embouchure effort and the air effort.

‘Rarely’ meaning it can be done. Apparently it works for Chris and a lot of his students.

kalijah wrote:
Pitch-matching (ear training) on a mouthpiece provides the wrong embouchure muscle memory relative to playing the same pitches on the full instrument.

That’s not what he’s saying; re-read his post. Chris is stating that he finds that playing the mouthpiece can benefit trumpet playing (probably through ear training, learning flexibility and so forth). The notion that the embouchure for playing the mouthpiece is identical and that the skills must be directly transferrable is something you’ve tacked on yourself. In the same way that drumming is in no way the same as playing the trumpet, yet it can benefit one’s sense of rythm and timing nonetheless (that’s an analogy by the way).

Chris’ ideas, whether you agree with them or not, aren’t that outlandish if you’re willing to read them in the correct context.
_________________
1975 Olds Recording trumpet
1997 Getzen 700SP trumpet
1955 Olds Super cornet
1939 Buescher 280 flugelhorn
AR Resonance mouthpieces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kalijah
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 06 Nov 2003
Posts: 3212
Location: Alabama

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It literally contains the words ‘admittedly simplified’, uses the word ‘similar’ instead of ‘identical’ and it’s a comparison to a guitar. What more do you need: a neon sign flashing the word ‘analogy’?


But it isn't even similar. Need I explain?

And "admittedly simplified" does not mean accurate.

Even if he had qualified it as an analogy, it is still a BAD one. It is grossly overselling the mouthpiece's contribution to the system.

And the "mouthpiece is the primary instrument" statement? IS that an analogy too?

And that's not "cherry picking".

Quote:
Chris’ ideas, whether you agree with them or not, aren’t that outlandish


To me they are. But I am not stuck inside the brass pedagogy echo chamber. Where you must believe everything and question nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stuartissimo
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 17 Dec 2021
Posts: 795
Location: Europe

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 10:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It’s interesting how you’re trying to deflect the discussion to the point you wish to argue rather than what’s actually being discussed. It’s very easy for you to be ‘right’ that way. But I’m not interested.
_________________
1975 Olds Recording trumpet
1997 Getzen 700SP trumpet
1955 Olds Super cornet
1939 Buescher 280 flugelhorn
AR Resonance mouthpieces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Irving
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Feb 2003
Posts: 1828

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 11:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kalijah, I don't agree with this statement at all. You are putting the cart before the horse.

"Pitch-matching (ear training) on a mouthpiece provides the wrong embouchure muscle memory relative to playing the same pitches on the full instrument."

I regularly pick up the mouthpiece and play accurate pitches without using another instrument. What enables me to do that has nothing to do with muscle memory. I can also do the same singing. (Do your vocal chords have muscle memory to sing notes as well? I don't think so). It has to do with having the pitches in my mind beforehand. If the pitch is clear in my imagination, it will come out on the mouthpiece, singing, or on the trumpet. The muscles just cooperate, as if it were a computer following software.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kalijah
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 06 Nov 2003
Posts: 3212
Location: Alabama

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It’s interesting how you’re trying to deflect the discussion to the point you wish to argue rather than what’s actually being discussed.


Dude, I responded to YOUR post and argued YOUR points . I am entitled to do that. AND you call that "deflecting"? Slick indeed.

Irving wrote:
Quote:
You are putting the cart before the horse.

I regularly pick up the mouthpiece and play accurate pitches without using another instrument. What enables me to do that has nothing to do with muscle memory.


I didn't say one can't. I want to be tuned in and dead-on if the mouthpiece rim is on my embouchure. I am only interested in the full instrument being in play. I play in electric situations with loud surroundings where the feel of pitch becomes important. Sure, I could play "match the pitch" with a mouthpiece buzz but using more embouchure effort than is required to play those same pitches on the full instrument. I choose not to risk introducing additional effort and a different feel for those pitches. I choose not to hamper my tonal efficiency with that exercise. Using singing for that activity will not affect the efficient playing feel like buzzing does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
astadler
Veteran Member


Joined: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 110
Location: Kansas City, MO

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What I always find funny about the buzzing controversy discussions is that you essentially always have the “pro-buzzing” side saying “this works for me and some of my students for xyz reasons, use it or don’t if it doesn’t work for you.”

Then you have the anti-buzzing side who will never for a second concede that it’s ok for others to buzz and there might be benefits for some, even if they personally don’t use it for themselves or their students.

Pedagogy isn’t one size fits all and that cuts both ways. I did both mouthpiece and free buzzing growing up, and I do mouthpiece buzzing with most of my students when I feel it’s appropriate and helpful. I don’t really do it myself in my own daily practice anymore but I think it helped get me to where I am having done it in the past.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Irving
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Feb 2003
Posts: 1828

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kalijah, I can't relate to "wrong muscle memory" or "feel of the pitch" at all. My chops always feel different, so can't depend on the feel of my chops. I'm not saying that you are wrong, only that we can only base success on the results that we get, not on the path we use to get there.

The only teacher that I had that advocated mouthpiece buzzing was Jacobs. He liked it to get away from the instrument, to have a feeling of strangeness, which helped when trying to develop new habits, as well as playing music without an instrument. Sing the tune in your mind and out it comes from the mouthpiece. I don't know what other people claim about buzzing, since I am pretty much out of the loop. If it helps, great. If not, great as well. Try something else. All of the other teachers I had never even mentioned mouthpiece buzzing. I'd like to hear from the author of the book why he advocates buzzing. He hasn't made much of a case for it. Reinhart advocated lip buzzing no mouthpiece to firm up flabby lips. No mouthpiece buzzing though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JayKosta
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 3047
Location: Endwell NY USA

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Irving wrote:
... , I can't relate to "wrong muscle memory" or "feel of the pitch" at all. My chops always feel different, so can't depend on the feel of my chops. ...

--------------------------------
Do you have an habitual 'embouchure / air action' that you employ to play a clean 'tuning note written C'?
What about for all the other notes?
If you 'imagine' the pitch of the desired note, do your fingers / embouchure / air sort-of automatically 'do it'?
edit: based on the post after this one (from Chris O'Hara), I think it is much more accurate (and helpful) to imagine the entire 'sound' (not just pitch) of the note.

Is there some other way you'd describe 'what you do'. And how do you predict / control the result?
_________________
method 1: DO it right and right things will HAPPEN
method 2: make the RIGHT THINGS happen
--
See / Think / Adjust / Do
becomes See & Do.


Last edited by JayKosta on Sun Oct 01, 2023 3:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris OHara
Veteran Member


Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 170
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2023 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Irving wrote:
I can't relate to "wrong muscle memory" or "feel of the pitch" at all. My chops always feel different, so can't depend on the feel of my chops.


This has also been my experience. There are sooo many factors that effect how our chops "feel". If you keep chasing the "feel" you're not focused on sound. Feel=Fail, Sound=Success.

I wrote a bit about the benefits of mouthpiece playing (see page 2). Check out the book, see for yourself!

Happy trumpeting!
_________________
Christopher J. O'Hara, DMA
Bach/Conn-Selmer Performing Artist
Denis Wick Performing Artist
www.chrisjohara.com
www.alliancebrass.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wilktone
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 25 Aug 2002
Posts: 718
Location: Asheville, NC

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 7:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my opinion an inconsistent playing feel is a symptom of something not being correct. I don't mean that you should not pay attention to sound, but if you're not getting a consistent playing sensation then perhaps you should evaluate and correct your playing mechanics. Both sound and feel are important.

Dave
_________________
wilktone.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kehaulani
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 8647
Location: Hawai`i - Texas

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, I don't really know, from a scientific/acoustic analysis, how a sound is produced. f And to defend or criticize one way of thinking over another on this topic is beating a dead horse. But I do know two things:

*There are legions of highly accomplished trumpet players who are buzzing proponents. IMO it's just arrogant to say that they don't know what they're doing. The proof is in the pudding.

*And I, personally, have found the concept of letting the lips casually be brought into vibration, and mouthpipe playing, liberating. I play with a more relaxed embouchure. I no longer free buzz.

I am definitely not anti-science, but I know that there are factors that are sometimes unseen that effect the end result and sometimes in our rush to insist that our understanding of a scientific process is the only answer overlooks this unseen factor.
_________________
"If you don't live it, it won't come out of your horn." Bird

YTR-8310Z II Bobby Shew
Getzen Capri Cornet
Adams F-1 Flghn


Last edited by kehaulani on Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:36 am; edited 5 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JayKosta
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 3047
Location: Endwell NY USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My 'current thinking' (thanks to Chris O'Hara) is that for playing and practice 'imagine the sound' needs to be much more than just mental 'hear the sound in your brain'. And it is much more than just the pitch.

'Imagine the sound' certainly needs to include the sound itself, but also needs all the physical actions that go into producing that sound. And for practice, there needs to be awareness of whether those physical actions are being done in the way to produce the desired sound - and how to make adjustments when needed.
_________________
method 1: DO it right and right things will HAPPEN
method 2: make the RIGHT THINGS happen
--
See / Think / Adjust / Do
becomes See & Do.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheiden
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 8904
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

trompette229 wrote:
I will say that over the years any time a thread comes up about tongue arch, airspeed or what have you, Kalijah can't wait to respond (usually in a fairly abrupt manor) but I have yet to see a post where he adds anything helpful in any way to performing and playing music on the trumpet.

It's fine to want to give your opinion but why not try to add something positive to the discussion. If all of your "knowledge" is so much more informed than most of the professionals and teachers, why not give some of your own advice on how to play the horn?

This isn't as combative as it sounds, it's a real inquiry. I think you'd get far less pushback if you were adding something positive that helps players other than only saying they are wrong.
2 cents

+1
_________________
"I'm an engineer, which means I think I know a whole bunch of stuff I really don't."
Charles J Heiden/So Cal
Bach Strad 180ML43*/43 Bb/Yamaha 731 Flugel/Benge 1X C/Kanstul 920 Picc/Conn 80A Cornet
Bach 3C rim on 1.5C underpart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheiden
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 8904
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kehaulani wrote:
Actually, I don't really know, from a scientific/acoustic analysis, how a sound is produced. f And to defend or criticize one way of thinking over another on this topic is beating a dead horse. But I do know two things:

*There are legions of highly accomplished trumpet players who are buzzing proponents. IMO it's just arrogant to say that they don't know what they're doing. The proof is in the pudding.

*And I, personally, have found the concept of letting the lips casually be brought into vibration, and mouthpipe playing, liberating. I play with a more relaxed embouchure. I no longer free buzz.

I am definitely not anti-science, but I know that there are factors that are sometimes unseen that effect the end result and sometimes in our rush to insist that our understanding of a scientific process is the only answer overlooks this unseen factor.
+1
_________________
"I'm an engineer, which means I think I know a whole bunch of stuff I really don't."
Charles J Heiden/So Cal
Bach Strad 180ML43*/43 Bb/Yamaha 731 Flugel/Benge 1X C/Kanstul 920 Picc/Conn 80A Cornet
Bach 3C rim on 1.5C underpart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris OHara
Veteran Member


Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 170
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 1:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wilktone wrote:
In my opinion an inconsistent playing feel is a symptom of something not being correct. I don't mean that you should not pay attention to sound, but if you're not getting a consistent playing sensation then perhaps you should evaluate and correct your playing mechanics. Both sound and feel are important.

Dave


I don't disagree with this, however, I stand firmly by the notion that "feeling good" while playing is a byproduct of "sounding good" and that chasing "feel" will never get you to the "sound" you want, in fact, it will often take you further away. Maybe you have a cold, or you're tired from the night before, etc. Just because it "feels" different, that should not effect how it "sounds." I've played many shows where things felt awful (especially when I had impacted wisdom teeth on tour - yikes!), but sounded great.

Sound > Feel
_________________
Christopher J. O'Hara, DMA
Bach/Conn-Selmer Performing Artist
Denis Wick Performing Artist
www.chrisjohara.com
www.alliancebrass.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Craig Swartz
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 7748
Location: Des Moines, IA area

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those who are "chasing" either feeling or sound are only reacting to what has already happened. To late to fix things at that point.

To buzz or not to buzz: if the player does not already know what pitch, dynamic, release (attack) nuance is necessary before starting the breath column, odds increase that what comes out will not be what he/she/it wants to hear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
kehaulani
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 8647
Location: Hawai`i - Texas

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@Chris - is your bool sequential or does it jump around like the Arban?
_________________
"If you don't live it, it won't come out of your horn." Bird

YTR-8310Z II Bobby Shew
Getzen Capri Cornet
Adams F-1 Flghn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris OHara
Veteran Member


Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 170
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2023 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kehaulani wrote:
@Chris - is your bool sequential or does it jump around like the Arban?


The books is divided into sections:

(Information - fairy exhaustive, covers topics ranging from basic concepts to extended overtone series - for 3 and 4 valves, intonation - with chord tuning, an explanation of the European Rules - "Vacchiano's Rules", transposition, performance anxiety, practicing, etc.)

I. Buzzing/Fundamentals (contains ear-training/intervals, articulation, rhythmic studies, flexibility, finger dexterity, note-bending, ornaments, etc.)

II. Scales (major - equal treatment in all keys each major key ends with applicable orchestral excerpts, minor - all forms including jazz melodic minor, modes, and extended scales - Armenian, blues, bebop, Hungarian major/minor, octatonics, pentatonics, whole tone, etc. - as Rafael Mendez would say: "Scales, scales, and more scales.")

III. Music/Method application (method for learning music applied to three Arban characteristic studies - essentially a step-by-step guide to learning the works, three solo J.S. Bach tunes, and some original etudes based on less common scales)

(Glossary - contains terms and phrase translations)

I usually do something out of each section weekly with students. Does that help? I'm happy to answer any questions!

As a heads up, I am currently working on beginner and intermediate books that are strictly progressive (taking some of the concepts from the first part of Saint-Jacome, but making them more practical for younger students combined with my own approach). These are currently in the test phase with students.
_________________
Christopher J. O'Hara, DMA
Bach/Conn-Selmer Performing Artist
Denis Wick Performing Artist
www.chrisjohara.com
www.alliancebrass.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Pedagogy All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group