View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
oliver king Heavyweight Member
Joined: 07 Aug 2008 Posts: 1742
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:13 am Post subject: Monette Constant Pitch Center |
|
|
Are the shorter shank and wider throat the factors that give Monette that ability? How do they compare to the Stork/Vacchiano pieces? _________________ LB Bel Canto #59
Holton B47
Frankenhorn projects 1-5
Adams F1
Olds Super Tenor Trombone
Alesis QS8
B2MS3, B2GS3, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hack001 Heavyweight Member
Joined: 20 Jun 2004 Posts: 1685
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
That information is top secret. I think there was a leak a while back that Dave Monette got all his "ideas" from his cat, Sheldon. STC... Sheldon The Cat. Or maybe there is voodoo in the brass he uses. Or like evil demons possessing the mouthpieces that make you play better when you are alive, but steal your soul in return. Who knows. That's why I use Karl Hammond pieces. Each one has been checked with a demon/voodoo scanner and you get a printout of the scan with a guarantee that there is no voodoo or demons. I don't know if he has a cat or not.
Monettes are nothing like Stork mouthpieces. _________________ Practicing is for the insecure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MrJackson Veteran Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2009 Posts: 172 Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
HAHAHAHAHAHA
as to the mouthpieces, it's a combination (I believe) of each angle, taper rate, rim shape, metal density, etc that is unique to each mouthpiece model. they definitely do play more in-tune than other brands, and the different mouthpieces for different key instruments does result in more overtones and color. the sound does tend to be a bit more diffuse than other mouthpieces, but if you are a player with alot of core to begin with that might not be an issue. They are worth the money, IMO, as well. _________________ Yamaha Chicago Bb
Yamaha Chicago C
Schilke E3L
Schilke P5-4 B/G |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AverageJoe Heavyweight Member
Joined: 20 May 2002 Posts: 4116 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Constant pitch center is a marketing gimmick more than anything else (anyone remember the old Benge "Resno-Tempered Bell"?). Seriously, pitch center has much more to do with how you play than it does with what you play. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sparxIV Veteran Member
Joined: 28 Nov 2006 Posts: 257
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:31 am Post subject: horns |
|
|
- are you suggesting the 'Resno-Tempered Bell' is (was) a marketing gimmick ?
Cheers,
Ted
www.sparxmusic.com _________________ sparx |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mafields627 Heavyweight Member
Joined: 09 Nov 2001 Posts: 3776 Location: AL
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
AverageJoe wrote: | Seriously, pitch center has much more to do with how you play than it does with what you play. |
Let's take things step farther. Keeping in mind that I have no experience with Monette mouthpieces, might there be something about the design of the piece that, in order to get the best benefit from it, requires you to play a certain way? _________________ --Matt--
No representation is made that the quality of this post is greater than the quality of that of any other poster. Oh, and get a teacher! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loweredsixth Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 1844 Location: Fresno, California, USA, North America, Earth, Solar System, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
mafields627 wrote: | AverageJoe wrote: | Seriously, pitch center has much more to do with how you play than it does with what you play. |
Let's take things step farther. Keeping in mind that I have no experience with Monette mouthpieces, might there be something about the design of the piece that, in order to get the best benefit from it, requires you to play a certain way? |
Only in that they play best when there are the least amount of physical "adjustments" as possible. But isn't that the way to play most efficiently anyway? _________________ The name I go by in the real world is Joe Lewis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loweredsixth Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 1844 Location: Fresno, California, USA, North America, Earth, Solar System, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:09 am Post subject: Re: Monette Constant Pitch Center |
|
|
oliver king wrote: | Are the shorter shank and wider throat the factors that give Monette that ability? How do they compare to the Stork/Vacchiano pieces? |
I imagine that the throat, backbore, and shank length are where the "magic" lies. They seem to have no problem changing cup shape, size, diameter, and rim contour to meet your needs. _________________ The name I go by in the real world is Joe Lewis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lipshurt Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Posts: 2642 Location: vista ca
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Howdy...
I thought about not sending this post cuz I dont really want to get into a back and forth about monettes secrets, magic, voodoo, math, etc.
This is just stuff that have observed over the course of many years working on peoples mouthpieces, and doing lots of what might be called research. If someone thinks I'm wrong that's fine, but I would hate to be on the receiving end of the kind of abuse that some people dish out on the internet. I'm posting it though because it's really pretty basic stuff, that LOTS of people have known for lots of years. There may be a spelling error or two. Please let that mean nothing.
I have made a lot of mouthpieces modeled after the monette ones to try to see if it was the shank/backbore/throat combination that was the "secret"
That is the case I think.
The cups and rims are just standard fare, and are really copies of other mouthpieces (just like about every mouthpiece is.) see comparator
The shorter length, bigger throat, longer throat, and shorter backbore work great together. This is not not new by the way. It's really really really old. You have to have all three pieces to the puzzle or it sucks though.
People have been doing this modification to bach and other mouthpieces for decades. Freddie webster did to a lot of his famous friend's mouthpieces (dizzy etc)
If you take a standard mouthpiece, cut the end off about .320 or so, then turn the shank down to it's original end diameter so it's back to it's original dimension (probably about .385) you will see that the end is a bit thicker than "normal". Just like a monette. (dont bevel it out to make the end thinner...does not work very well)
Then if you open the throat to either a 23 or 22 you will see that is longer too, just like a monette (pretty exactly too). Lead mouthpieces need about a 25 throat but the same long length. Smaller backbores proportionately make that happen.
The resultant backbore is right there in the ball park too, allowing for different backbore choices etc. Pretty much they are short versions of "normal" backbore, as if you simply did not run the backbore tool as far into the mouthpiece, or, just cut the end off and the shaved the shank down.
So now you have a cup just like a monette, a throat just like a monette, and a backbore and overall length just like a monette. Which is just like any number of mouthpieces from the past, like a freddie webster mod, or work done by any number of mouthpiece guys from the past.
It will work really well too, for people that take to the short shank concept.
Not everyone is well suited to the short shank.
The short shank for some people is too slotty and might be too inflexible. It can also be a little diffused like the earlier post said. It also can be a little slower in response (but nothing like simply drilling out a mouthpiece!)
I never noticed the short shank being more in tune than a good "normal" mouthpiece, but the intonation is really good, especially in the upper and lower registers. I would call the intonation a toss up, with slightly different tendencies
I just switched back to a normal shank after a couple years, and like the core in the sound better, but I did like the feel and pitch and slots of the short shank thing. I could easily go back.
"prana" mouthpieces have bigger backbore, like you ran a normal length backbore tool all the way into a short mouthpiece. Then you have to really have a big throat to get the right throat length! Big as in a 18 or 17.
Lots of people have trouble with that though. I like it for a short time when it feels incredible, then I cant hang with it. I imagine some guys can really make that work. It might take a while though.
So there is my take on the short shank thing. It's not magic. It's just a mouthpiece _________________ Mouthpiece Maker
vintage Trumpet design enthusiast
www.meeuwsenmouthpieces.com
www.youtube.com/lipshurt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Foxytrpt Veteran Member
Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 277
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Monettes are a waste of $300! _________________ "What's the point of playing if you can't improvise?"
Bb Custom XO RG-V
Flugel Custom XO
Bach 3C
Bach 3FL
Hamanaga Custom 3C/Fl
www.myspace.com/foxytrpt
www.myspace.com/brassy_chicks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lipshurt Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Posts: 2642 Location: vista ca
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
$300 is not too bad if you get a custom made rim and cup and have it fit correctly in your specific horn. That kind of attention has to cost something.
A custom mouthpiece has to at least cost $150 just to pay for the labor of a skilled worker who deserves it. (or the CNC tooling costs
Monettes are gold plated too, plus the adjustment of the shank diameter is fairly time consuming.
And do monettes really cost $300?
Isn't that just for a "prana"?
I thought the regular ones were less money.
DOug M _________________ Mouthpiece Maker
vintage Trumpet design enthusiast
www.meeuwsenmouthpieces.com
www.youtube.com/lipshurt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
butxifxnot Heavyweight Member
Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 2353
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, standard monettes are $225. Pranas are the extra $75. And FT, if you found a mouthpiece that played better in every facet than what you have, you'd pay almost anything for it. ;P
Provided you could afford it, of course.
Lips, I know extremely little about mouthpiece stuff, but the Monette with it's non-standard shank and abnormally large throat size seems to me to be the clincher as to what makes it most different. Quite simply, nothing slots and tunes the way that design does for me.
And that's the key word: for me.
It doesn't work for everyone. But what does. _________________ "Never practice, always perform."
-Adolf Herseth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FDC05 Veteran Member
Joined: 27 Sep 2004 Posts: 441 Location: Virginia
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
A few things...
STC stands for "Superior Tone Color" not Sheldon the Cat, as people enjoy rumoring about...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SXLtHyZgb8&feature=channel_page
start about 5:30 into it.
I played Monettes for a few years, and did truly enjoy them. For a number of reasons, I no longer play them, but have nothing but good things to say about them.
The mouthpieces do tend to even out a lot of inherent intonation issues on a few horns that I have. And yes, they do require you to play differently!!! You simply cannot pivot or adjust very much at all or else the mouthpiece basically says "no more". Gimmick? Not for me...
Also... the mouthpieces are very carefully machined to fit perfectly into Monette trumpets. He does not have a Bach, Yamaha, Getzen, etc sitting around the shop to custom fit it to that horn. So, it may not play as well as advertised on your horn.
To each his own... I also play Hammond now and really enjoy them, but can't really say anything bad about Monettes. They are worth the money to those who find them to be worth the money.... I went to his shop last October and everyone was really nice, and had a great day there.
That's all! _________________ Mark |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oxleyk Heavyweight Member
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4180
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Constant Sales Pitch Center
Kent |
|
Back to top |
|
|
loweredsixth Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 1844 Location: Fresno, California, USA, North America, Earth, Solar System, Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Foxytrpt wrote: | Monettes are a waste of $300! |
But, you also said in another thread regarding a different mouthpiece product:
Foxytrpt wrote: | Of course they work! You'll see a lot pros who use them, and you'll see a lot pros who don't use them. It's a very personnal thing.
Just like running shoes, some are heavier than the other. But they both will work. If you like the feel go for it. Why deny yourself just because somebody said that they’re no good. |
hmmm... _________________ The name I go by in the real world is Joe Lewis |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trumpetDS Heavyweight Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 566 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
"constant pitch center" is Monette's marketing term. When I first heard the term I thought it was bunk. I then played a Monette for several years. When I switched to another brand, I was shocked at how the pitch can be so greatly affected by the mouthpiece, the G on the top of the staff in particular. The two brands that I have found play exceptionally well in tune are Monette and GR- which is ironic since Monettes have short shanks and large throats while GRs have long shanks, small throats, and longer bores. I think it is probably finding the right combination and balance. All this being said, I still prefer the sound of my Kanstul BMV 1.5 copy which I have been playing for seven years now. I have to make a lot more adjustments with regards to pitch and work a little harder, but the sound is my guide. It keeps me honest |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jocker Veteran Member
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 192
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Foxytrpt wrote: | Monettes are a waste of $300! |
...and these kind of comments are waste of time as you don't give any good reasons to support your statement. I hope that you have tried more than just B2 which is obviously way different than 3C's. You may actually like better matching sizes and new slap designs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bagmangood Heavyweight Member
Joined: 26 Feb 2009 Posts: 1352 Location: SF Bay Area
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:27 am Post subject: Re: Monette Constant Pitch Center |
|
|
oliver king wrote: | Are the shorter shank and wider throat the factors that give Monette that ability? How do they compare to the Stork/Vacchiano pieces? |
Summing up the thread so far
1.) the shorter shank and wide throat are factors (as well as the backbore), but no one outside the shop knows all of the details why and how
2.) A lot of people hate monettes
3.) Stork/Vacchiano pieces are not important to this thread
Stork pieces are very different, I've experimented with a few of them (and use a 3D with a T backbore for ska/lead), and the rims are probably the most comfortable i've played. (I normally play on a monette b2s3)
The sound is totally different though. They don't really compare (as in apples to orangutans, not one is better than the other)
Oh and:
4.) us monette users get really defensive of our equipment choices _________________ More than one trumpet
A "few" mouthpieces |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Matt Graves Heavyweight Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2001 Posts: 836 Location: Brooklyn NY
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The key to the right mouthpiece for you is the three Ss: Sound, Size and Shape make the difference. Words relate more to marketing and propaganda. _________________ For Online Lessons via Live Video, email
me at matthewjgraves@gmail.com
Author of Fundamental Flexibility Studies
Claude Gordon Certified Teacher
BAC Custom Dream Trumpet |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JakeUND Heavyweight Member
Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 589
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It matters how you approach playing them. I have quite a few friends that play Monette and sound great. For me, I love the rim and feel of my B4S but it has just gotten to be a pain with the huge throat and backbore. I would rather get by on something a little easier I guess. But if it works for you, by all means use it, but expect to try it longer than a day or two to decide whether it's great or before deciding against it. _________________ Lawler C7R
Leblanc T357
Monette B4S/B4L S1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|