• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

A more efficient Bach 3C


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Mouthpieces
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mcgovnor
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Posts: 2607
Location: ny ny

PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:25 pm    Post subject: Jerry Reply with quote

Jerry Hey is a 3c type player. He worked with Reeves on a mouthpiece with a 3c rim, an s cup deepened by .012, a 28 throat with a 692 backbore.
I play a similar mouthpiece, just .002 deeper than Jerry's.
From what I remember, Charlie Davis has some Bach 3 c's, threaded rims, with the cup sections cut short, by .005.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
iiipopes
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2015
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chuck in ny wrote:
popes

that's a really good suggestion, common, easy to find, inexpensive. as to your observation on cup depth and degree of brightness. small changes in cup volume either way are not going to affect your sound in a significant way. they will for a very short while, you plug the piece in and blow it and hey this sounds different. it's a function of the chops and body being used to the last piece. in a shockingly short period of time the lips and brain make adjustments and then you sound precisely as you did before. it's the nature of the trumpet that you can color sound out of a small volume mouthpiece with broad latitude.
great suggestion. low buck solutions are an excellent starting point.

Thanks. Yes, after playing on it for several months, it is the "new norm," and everything has blended in well.
_________________
King Super 20 Trumpet; Sov 921 Cornet
Bach cornet modded to be a 181L clone
Couesnon Flugelhorn and C trumpet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
annvill
Veteran Member


Joined: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 155

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2023 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lipshurt wrote:
For me, getting the 3c to be more efficient was a matter of downsizing the exact shape of the 3c cup by 2 percent. That means the cup was made smaller in all dimensions, depth, diameter, etc by the same percentage. You do that in CAD with the scaling tool. Only the cup curves, not the rim curves.

The 3c is .655 inner diameter, measured at .052 down from the high point of the rim. A 2 percent downsize end up with an inner diameter of .645. For me that downsize was the ticket for making the 3cvibe more efficient. Now I play 645 diameters on my lead piece and other pieces. Since the shape stays exactly the same with a 2percent scaling, the sound stays the same also.

I also make the 3c shape in .635 and .665 as well as .655, and they are two piece. I also think my 4 and 4 1/2 backbores are a better match for the 3c cup shape. They are a lilttle bit less curved of a backbore. Still not a straight taper though. Based on the purviance backbore .


A mouthpiece 3c as you say, smaller than 2%, you make it? Do you ship to Italy?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trumpetsnack
Regular Member


Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2023 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have this same problem with shallow mouthpieces- I too experience bottoming out when my lips swell up after a little bit of playing. I've had a lot of luck with Denis Wick mouthpieces. The rim seems to be a little bit flatter than a Bach or Curry, which I find comfortable. There also seems to be a bigger drop from the rim into the cup, which lets me play even some of their shallower mouthpieces without bottoming out on them. The only thing I've found is the sizing is kind of weird, I think Wick's 4 is like a Bach 3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mafields627
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 09 Nov 2001
Posts: 3776
Location: AL

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2023 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You may laught at this, but try a Jupiter 3C if the Bach doesn't work for you. My music store rep gave me one and I absolutely love it. It's comfortable, sounds good, plays evenly in all registers....and it's cheap.
_________________
--Matt--

No representation is made that the quality of this post is greater than the quality of that of any other poster. Oh, and get a teacher!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brassmoose
Regular Member


Joined: 23 Apr 2022
Posts: 79
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2023 3:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

trumpetsnack wrote:
I have this same problem with shallow mouthpieces- I too experience bottoming out when my lips swell up after a little bit of playing. I've had a lot of luck with Denis Wick mouthpieces. The rim seems to be a little bit flatter than a Bach or Curry, which I find comfortable. There also seems to be a bigger drop from the rim into the cup, which lets me play even some of their shallower mouthpieces without bottoming out on them. The only thing I've found is the sizing is kind of weird, I think Wick's 4 is like a Bach 3


If you like a 3C size with flat (wide) rim with some chop room, you may want to check out Jim New's W5S. I bottom on anything shallower than a D at the 3 rim size. Jim's S is in that D ballpark. His MS cup is just like a 3C cup and the W rim sets the lips & the undercut really helps with lip swelling.

I have a Wick 4 and I love the sound, but it's a bit big for most of my playing. The entrance to the Wick 4 from rim to cup is a bit more V shaped which I don't like, so the W5S solves that problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Lip 81
Regular Member


Joined: 07 Mar 2017
Posts: 21
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've tried all manner of 3C-like mouthpieces through the years, and my top recommendation for a more efficient version with similar sound and playing characteristics to a Bach 3C is the Yamaha Bobby Shew Jazz. For me, I believe it might be more a function of the rim shape moreso than the slight tweaks to the standard 3C cup and throat-entrance shapes. Either way, my experience is that it plays evenly in all registers, and I feel I have good control over tone quality depending upon the situation. The Yamaha Shew Jazz is readily available and inexpensive, and Kelly makes a fantastic lexan version for around the same price if one wanted to go that route.

If you're looking for something oriented more for the classical player, I've had success with the Horntrader HT3-27 "Classical". I get a great classical sound and good control even above the staff without a struggle. Steve Dillard's collaboration with Mark Curry yielded a line of great line of mouthpieces based around the rim shape of Arturo Sandoval's Mt. Vernon Bach 3C scaled down in diameter and paired with different underparts, of which the HT3-27 "Classical" is my favorite next to the HT3-Jazz and HT3CS-27.

Hope this helps!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brassmoose
Regular Member


Joined: 23 Apr 2022
Posts: 79
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Lip 81 wrote:

If you're looking for something oriented more for the classical player, I've had success with the Horntrader HT3-27 "Classical". I get a great classical sound and good control even above the staff without a struggle. Steve Dillard's collaboration with Mark Curry yielded a line of great line of mouthpieces based around the rim shape of Arturo Sandoval's Mt. Vernon Bach 3C scaled down in diameter and paired with different underparts, of which the HT3-27 "Classical" is my favorite next to the HT3-Jazz and HT3CS-27.


I have an HT3C-28 for sale. Bought it new from Steve at Horn Trader last year and I have never gigged with it. Maybe has 30 minutes on it. I'd let it go for $100 shipped to CONUS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iiipopes
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2015
Posts: 549

PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2023 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another update: as the years progress, and in spite of best efforts, the breath support changes, I have changed again. The Bobby Shew Jazz got to where on my Super 20 the tuning note 3rd space C started to go sharp as it became more difficult to get air through its tight backbore. It just became too tight for me and I was putting more effort than reasonable to get the air through it. So I backed off, did some research, and found a custom Bach 3C with a #76 backbore. Now, if you look at any comparator, the 3C cup is no deeper than many other Bach D cup mouthpieces, including a 7D. And of course, the stock backbore for Bach D cups is the #76, just slightly tighter than the stock #10 for Bach C cups. I purchased a 7D, loved the way it helped me manage my breath support, but I wanted the 3C rim. So I found a Bach 3C with a custom #76 backbore. To me, this is the most efficient 3C trumpet mouthpiece I have yet tried.

I must say that for other ergonomic reasons, as well as wanting to go a new direction, I am getting into cornets: a globe stamp Sov 921, a Cyborg .462 (previously marketed as a King 603, now a Bach CR301H), and a JP sop that my tech made to play better than some of the "big boys." Of course, a 3C is too bright for cornet. I will report when I get my last mouthpiece from Mark Curry with a 3BC cup, his "wobbly 27" throat, and his version of a slightly tighter backbore for the Cyborg cornet so I can blend better in a concert band situation with all the trumpets. Going the other way, I also have a Curry 3BBC for the mellow tone on my 921 when I am privileged when I go to the UK every few years to sit in with my friend's community brass band. Oh, and to point out the opposite extreme, the Wick 4B is THE cornet mouthpiece, but with its larger throat and open backbore, it takes tons of air to make its signature tone work, and is not efficient at all. But if you can play it, it is the signature British Brass Band tone.

As far as efficiency, something different: I have never played a mouthpiece more efficient of any make or model than Mark's 3TC cornet mouthpiece. If the player has good breath support and reasonable technique and endurance, and is compatible with a #3 rim, it is the closest to an effortless mouthpiece I have ever played since 1973 (Oh, God! Fifty years since I started school band!!!). His 3 series mouthpieces, both trumpet and cornet, have his version of a Bach Mt Vernon 3C rim. I can see that some trumpet players might think the trumpet version is too dark, but it is still a very efficient mouthpiece. Of course, all players are different, and YMMV.

All this talk about efficiency has its origins, as I have experienced in my physiological changes over the decades, in breath support. Anybody who is questioning the efficiency of a mouthpiece needs to consult a good teacher to make sure the breath support is still there, and that no bad habits, including shallow breathing, pressure, etc., have creeped into the player's technique over the years. That is what I have done before any change of mouthpiece to make sure my fundamentals were sound, even if I don't have all the breath support, range, endurance, or technique I had three to four decades ago. Only after an evaluation of the player's current breath support, can the quest for a different mouthpiece reasonably begin.
_________________
King Super 20 Trumpet; Sov 921 Cornet
Bach cornet modded to be a 181L clone
Couesnon Flugelhorn and C trumpet
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SterlingBell
Regular Member


Joined: 28 Dec 2018
Posts: 65

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I played a Bach 3C for about 30 years. At the ITG in Amherst, Massachusetts I tried a Monette B6. It took me a few times going back to the booth to actually pay the $240.00 back then for a mouthpiece. It was an easy switch and have been playing it for 20 years so far. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwilliamson77
Regular Member


Joined: 19 Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2023 4:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And this many years later no one has actually answered the details of the original question - about Stork and Marcinkiewicz. I've played both brands. Stork is not an efficient 3c. It's a beautiful sound but it was more work for me. I'm playing Marcinkiewicz exclusively these days. I have different pieces for different needs. 308 for a more classical sound. E3/3c for jazz and big band section work. E13 Chuck Findley for lead. The efficient 3c as requested is maybe the E3, but I really rate the 300 series and my 308. Perhaps a 310 or shallower could be the ticket here. I really like the symphonic backbone on the 300 series.
_________________
Schilke b1
Carolbrass flugelhorn
Yamaha xeno cornet
Yamaha Bobby Shew jazz, Yamaha 14a4a gp, Yamaha 15c4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Mouthpieces All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group