View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Craig Swartz Heavyweight Member
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 7770 Location: Des Moines, IA area
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow- old thread…
Through my experience and with a lot of horns owned over the years, my vote would go to Schilke. Not only are they good from the factory but they are ridiculously simple to maintain and seem to last forever. For example, I sent Steve Winans (Dr Valve) a CXL I use almost daily that was built in 1968 for some work. He claimed it did not need a rebuild, merely did an easy re-lap as well as some other non-piston work I requested and returned it. Have another old (1969) B3 that's never been rebuilt and is lightning quick. P5-4 has never offered problems, neither the E2 or any of the other older Schilke horns. I believe the stroke is slightly shorter than my Bachs or Benges as well.
Hands down the "winner", IMO, regardless of how one feels about the sound, slotting, etc. Best wishes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve Hollahan Heavyweight Member
Joined: 05 Oct 2005 Posts: 519 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:21 pm Post subject: Valves |
|
|
Love my Bach Valves, but some Selmer work is questionable. _________________ Steve Hollahan
Bach 37, 229 C
Yamaha 9620 D-Eb, 741 C, Flugel
Kanstul 900 piccolo trumpet
Sculptured Recrafting Custom Instrument Repair
and Restoration
www.sculpturedrecrafting.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
plp Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2003 Posts: 7023 Location: South Alabama
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tom K. wrote: | On the trumpets I have or have tried, the best are my 1953 Olds Ambassador. Amazing. Nothing comes close to those. I like the 2004 Bach I have as well. |
You know, I was going to post about my 1949 Ambassador as being as good as anything else I own, seems they really got it right early in the game.
I have pretty much a 4 way tie for the best, first among equals being my Besson 10-10. As has been said repeatedly, the microbar valve design is simply as good as it gets. Second would be abovementioned Ambassador. Third is my daily driver, a 1969 Conn 60-B. The top sprung valve design they used sadly was too little, too late. Who knows, if Conn had made the switch to these across the board in the early 1960's perhaps it would've been enough to keep them solvent.
The strange thing is, they had that design in the 1920's! The 4th place tie is a 1928 Conn 2-B, also with top sprung valves, very similar in design to the 60-B. As both are top tier professional trumpets, I'm sure cost came into play as to why Conn devoted most of their design to bottom sprung valves. _________________ Since all other motives—fame, money, power, even honor—are thrown out the window the moment I pick up that instrument..... I play because I love doing it, even when the results are disappointing. In short, I do it to do it.” Wayne Booth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bill Martin New Member
Joined: 03 Feb 2009 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Valves? I own Selmer, Conn, Bach, Eastman, Jupiter, and Olds cornets, trumpets, slide and valve trombones, and euphoniums.
NOBODY beats the valves made by Olds. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chuck in ny Heavyweight Member
Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 3597 Location: New York
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
STAINLESS STEEL VALVES
At some period over the last few years Boosey & Hawkes [Besson] changed their valve material from Monel, or similar, to stainless steel. Presumably this was to make the manufacturing process cheaper. [The normal process is to start with a larger diameter valve tube to take the pressure of passage insertion, and then grind it down to size.] This crass decision of using Stainless Steel has now put a finite life on an instrument. Stainless steel is not a bearing material. Any good engineer will tell you this. So what happens? A valve, made of material as hard as the cutlery we use to eat, is in constant frictional contact with the relatively soft brass of the instrument casing. So instead of the two different bearing materials ‘mating’ together,
i.e. Brass/Monel/German Silver etc., the stainless steel valve grinds out the valve casing itself on each depression by the player. Add a small blemish to the stainless steel and we have the perfect scourer.
Of course, as Stainless Steel is not a bearing material, valves stick – the player takes them out, believing that oil is needed. This grinds & scores the inner casing even more when they re-insert them. In a very short time the valve casing of the instrument becomes triangular in section.
The reason for this is: looking at a valve, it can be approximately sectioned into three vertical banks of holes with three continuous lengths of metal separating them. The latter, having more mass, grind away the casing at a different rate to the holed sections. Q.E.D. triangular casings = ruined instrument.
Prove it yourselves. Loosen the top valve cap of your ‘Besson’ Tuba, Tenor Horn etc, lift the valve clear of the pin, then carefully rotate the valve. Does it rotate freely, or does it feel like driving on a flat tyre? If the latter – yes, you’ve very likely got Stainless Steel valves and your casings are getting nicely chewed.
these comments are by denis wedgwood from a post by gordon h. i greatly respect denis' acumen. on the other hand the same goes for the people at carol brass and adams. can anyone reconcile this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MacMichael Heavyweight Member
Joined: 20 May 2011 Posts: 646
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think this is panic-mongering by the monel mafia.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sustained note Heavyweight Member
Joined: 05 Oct 2004 Posts: 643 Location: Givat Shmuel, Israel
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
chuck in ny wrote: | STAINLESS STEEL VALVES
At some period over the last few years Boosey & Hawkes [Besson] changed their valve material from Monel, or similar, to stainless steel. Presumably this was to make the manufacturing process cheaper. [The normal process is to start with a larger diameter valve tube to take the pressure of passage insertion, and then grind it down to size.] This crass decision of using Stainless Steel has now put a finite life on an instrument. Stainless steel is not a bearing material. Any good engineer will tell you this. So what happens? A valve, made of material as hard as the cutlery we use to eat, is in constant frictional contact with the relatively soft brass of the instrument casing. So instead of the two different bearing materials ‘mating’ together,
i.e. Brass/Monel/German Silver etc., the stainless steel valve grinds out the valve casing itself on each depression by the player. Add a small blemish to the stainless steel and we have the perfect scourer.
Of course, as Stainless Steel is not a bearing material, valves stick – the player takes them out, believing that oil is needed. This grinds & scores the inner casing even more when they re-insert them. In a very short time the valve casing of the instrument becomes triangular in section.
The reason for this is: looking at a valve, it can be approximately sectioned into three vertical banks of holes with three continuous lengths of metal separating them. The latter, having more mass, grind away the casing at a different rate to the holed sections. Q.E.D. triangular casings = ruined instrument.
Prove it yourselves. Loosen the top valve cap of your ‘Besson’ Tuba, Tenor Horn etc, lift the valve clear of the pin, then carefully rotate the valve. Does it rotate freely, or does it feel like driving on a flat tyre? If the latter – yes, you’ve very likely got Stainless Steel valves and your casings are getting nicely chewed.
these comments are by denis wedgwood from a post by gordon h. i greatly respect denis' acumen. on the other hand the same goes for the people at carol brass and adams. can anyone reconcile this? |
I would recommend "encasing" the first paragraph within " ", as this is really a quote and not your own opinion.
People might conclude that you are stating your opinion, even with the clarification on the bottom of the page.
Just a thought. _________________ Michael Greenberg
Giv'at Shmuel
Israel
Trumpet: Schilke B1 (2005)
Mouthpiece: Schilke Soloiste MG1
(Marc Geujon) gold plated
----------------
Keep a sense of humor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
amigomatt Veteran Member
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 121 Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
The best valves BY FAR that I have ever used are on my Stomvi Master C trumpet. I know these guys are also master jewellers and I'm sure this heritage has something to do with the precision of it. Even the slides are noticeably smooth fitting. Everything 'pops' and there seems to be a weight and springback sort of feeling to them whilst remaining smooth and soft which gives the impression of instantaneous action and speed. I can definitely play faster things better on them and they are so direct. A noticeable step up from any of my other horns and anything else I've tried.
I did get that kind of speed of action with a Ganschhorn when I tried it though, but obviously a different design with them being rotary. _________________ Kanstul 1500A
Bach Strad LB25 43 leadpipe (modified)
Stomvi Master C
Schilke P 5-4 piccolo
Bach flugel
Yamaha D/Eb
Stork mouthpieces
http://northernhorn.wordpress.com/
http://www.facebook.com/northernhorn
http://uk.youtube.com/user/amigomatt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blbaumgarn Heavyweight Member
Joined: 26 Jul 2017 Posts: 705
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:44 am Post subject: best valves |
|
|
This is a great discussion even if I am adding years after the first string. I don't have the experience with Kanstul. I tried two different Bessons in a shop. Was impressed by both but didn't play long enough to rate valves with other horns. For me subjectively it is:
Getzen, first by a long ways
Schilke, second and very, very good
Benge, third although I always felt like the throw was longer
Yamaha, fourth, as I played a student model for a week long
ago while mine Benge was being serviced.
If trumpet valves were a space shuttle I would always play Getzen so I knew I would be coming back safe and sound. thanks for a great topic, God Bless. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brad361 Heavyweight Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2007 Posts: 7080 Location: Houston, TX.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:25 am Post subject: Re: best valves |
|
|
blbaumgarn wrote: | This is a great discussion even if I am adding years after the first string. I don't have the experience with Kanstul. I tried two different Bessons in a shop. Was impressed by both but didn't play long enough to rate valves with other horns. For me subjectively it is:
Getzen, first by a long ways
Schilke, second and very, very good
Benge, third although I always felt like the throw was longer
Yamaha, fourth, as I played a student model for a week long
ago while mine Benge was being serviced.
If trumpet valves were a space shuttle I would always play Getzen so I knew I would be coming back safe and sound. thanks for a great topic, God Bless. |
Since we’re resurrecting an old discussion: the absolute BEST valves I’ve ever had are those that were rebuilt by Steve Winans.
Brad _________________ When asked if he always sounds great:
"I always try, but not always, because the horn is merciless, unpredictable and traitorous." - Arturo Sandoval |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RandyTX Heavyweight Member
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 Posts: 5299 Location: Central Texas
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a bit surprised about the praise for the Ambassador valve block. They're certainly reliable enough, but they feel much too heavy in their action, almost distractingly mechanical. In short, I don't like them at all.
That said, I really like the valves on my super and recording horns.
I don't think the monel vs. stainless steel thing makes much difference. I have good horns with both. Take care of them, keep them clean and use good oil, it shouldn't matter.
Mountain, meet mole hill. _________________ "Music is like candy, you throw the (w)rappers away." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rufflicks Heavyweight Member
Joined: 14 Mar 2011 Posts: 641 Location: Mesa AZ
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
trumpjosh Heavyweight Member
Joined: 26 Jan 2002 Posts: 741 Location: Arizona
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rufflicks wrote: | I love the valves on the Honda CB700SC Nighthawk 700S
The four-cylinder engine featured double overhead cams, with hydraulic lifters which eliminated valve adjustments. That and this was a cool bike.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_CB700SC
Best, Jon |
Yeah, but what oil did you use? _________________ www.milanomusic.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|