View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RL Veteran Member
Joined: 06 Sep 2009 Posts: 162
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good thread.....I've done this as well some time ago and marked my mouthpiece so that it's always in the right position. Didn't discussed this with others because I thought that they wouldn't take me serious.....good to read that more trumpeters are doing the same....
Next step is doing a valve allignment... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
american boy Veteran Member
Joined: 22 Sep 2012 Posts: 344 Location: ny
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wanted to clock a conductor once..Took a long deep breath instead |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ALaschiver Heavyweight Member
Joined: 26 Feb 2005 Posts: 639
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 6:14 am Post subject: "Clocking" mouthpipes |
|
|
The shop that does my restorations, clocks the mouthpipes on certain appropriate horns. He does work for major symphony players so this must have merit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TKSop Heavyweight Member
Joined: 23 Feb 2014 Posts: 1735 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would guess this would be minimal on higher quality modern pieces...
Then again, if a player thinks it makes a difference then the psychological benefit may be valuable in its own right.
It would be interesting to see whether players with "clocked" pieces would clock the same spot under blind tested conditions.
I can't say I've bothered beyond the ocd-ish compulsion to have the brand centered upwards.
When I've accidentally not done so, I can't say I've noticed any difference, but that's rarely happened. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
_Daff Heavyweight Member
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Posts: 1431
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are actually (at least) three components in play, the mouthpiece, the receiver, and the leadpipe. In theory, these components should all align perfectly on a common, central axis. In addition to manufacturing tolerances (imperfections), consider the compounded effects when the receiver is minutely askew of the leadpipe and the mouthpiece is minutely askew of the receiver.
I swear by the positive effects of mp clocking. It's akin to fine-tuning a station an old analog radio dial. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
homebilly Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Dec 2010 Posts: 2197 Location: Venice, CA & Paris, France
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
i prefer to clock my horn instead
_________________ ron meza (deadbeat jazz musician) & (TH 5 post ghost neighborhood watch ringleader)
waiting for Fed-Ex to deliver a $50 trumpet to my door. shipping was prepaid by seller of course!
http://ronmeza.com
http://highdefinitionbigband.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Mohan Heavyweight Member
Joined: 13 Nov 2001 Posts: 9830 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another legitimate reason to clock a mouthpiece is to prevent a colleague from seeing what size mouthpiece you're playing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Odneal's Inferno Veteran Member
Joined: 22 Sep 2004 Posts: 424 Location: Houston (Baytown), Texas
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was taught this practice by Dick Schaffer of the Houston Symphony. He played in the symphony over 30 years was one of my teachers. He was a fine jazz player and a fan of Maynard as were a lot of the brass section was, especially the bass trombonist.
I have been doing this for years. I use the backbore number on my Warburton mouthpiece and I can hear and fell a difference when I play. _________________ Bob Odneal
Maynard Ferguson Alumni
Casual Double High C method
Casual Double High C Zoom Lessons
Music Educator
www.bobodneal.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mm55 Heavyweight Member
Joined: 01 Jul 2013 Posts: 1412
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
_Daff wrote: | There are actually (at least) three components in play, the mouthpiece, the receiver, and the leadpipe. In theory, these components should all align perfectly on a common, central axis. In addition to manufacturing tolerances (imperfections), consider the compounded effects when the receiver is minutely askew of the leadpipe and the mouthpiece is minutely askew of the receiver.
I swear by the positive effects of mp clocking. It's akin to fine-tuning a station an old analog radio dial. |
Regardless of the receiver and the leadpipe, clocking can only make a difference if the mouthpiece itself is asymmetrical in some way. Defective machining, inconsistent plating, non-uniform material, and effects of number stamping are all possible sources of asymmetry. For a modern mouthpiece, properly made on modern equipment, none of these sources seems plausible to me.
Double-blind testing might shed some light (and draw some ire, typically). _________________ '75 Bach Strad 180ML/37
'79 King Silver Flair
'07 Flip Oakes Wild Thing
'42 Selmer US
'90 Yamaha YTR6450S(C)
'12 Eastman ETR-540S (D/Eb)
'10 Carol CPT-300LR pkt
'89 Yamaha YCR2330S crnt
'13 CarolBrass CFL-6200-GSS-BG flg
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy Del Heavyweight Member
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 2665 Location: sunny Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was introduced to the concept by my first trumpet teacher back in the 1970's. He clocked all his mouthpieces and then set a small glass jewel to make the upright spot. He also only used 1 Bb at a time...
I tend to work out the best sot on each horn and mouthpiece, and keep them that way. It may help the trumpet play better, or help me play the trumpet better.
Now knows, but it's something to do!
Cheers
Andy _________________ so many horns, so few good notes... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stumac Heavyweight Member
Joined: 19 Nov 2008 Posts: 697 Location: Flinders, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My Wedge mouthpiece only plays at 2 positions 180 degrees apart.
I have an Armstrong mouthpiece in which the cup and backbore are misaligned by half the throat diameter, it does not play well at any position.
Regards, Stuart. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ed Kennedy Heavyweight Member
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 3187
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dan O'Donnell wrote: | During my 40 years of playing the Trumpet I never understood this concept. When a typical MP is manufactured on a lathe, (and I can assume this hold true for a CNC) the diameters are concentric to each other meaning that they all are centered or share the same centerline. What am I missing with this logic? |
Buffing and plating are other variables. Also, bearings in the headstock of the lathe and alignment of the tailstock which holds the backbore cutting tools. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ed Kennedy Heavyweight Member
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 3187
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've seen clocking demonstrated in front of a trumpet playing audience twice by Yamaha technician, Wayne Tanabe. I didn't believe it and now I do. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrumpetDan79 Veteran Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2015 Posts: 157
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I met Bob and Wayne some years ago, I had never heard of this either. I was very skeptical at first, but I certainly believe in it. We do this every time I change a mouthpiece, and get my horns adjusted by them.
I find a "12-o'clock" position, then turn it clockwise at quarter turns until I find the sound I'm looking for along with a balanced resistance. Then if I need, I can further experiment with "10, 20, 25, 35, etc....on the clock."
Older mouthpieces that were cut by hand really respond to this adjustment, and etc-etc explained it great! And I agree as mentioned about modern CNC mouthpieces. Sometimes, they are less prone to the effects of clocking, but clocking in itself does not make the big drastic differences in adjusting. It's just one part.
The cup and rim are important when discussing this, however I would submit the backbore and shank are just as if not more so when talking about clocking.
Check out the end of the shank on your mouthpiece. Is it slightly out of round? If it is, don't round it. Just clock it. You'll notice where more resistance is vs. less.
Trust me, that is the just the BEGINNING of the rabbit hole of trumpet adjusting. Stuff I ain't talkin' about, haha. But I can assure you this and other adjustments are very real.
Happy New Year!!
D _________________ Daniel J. Flores
Trumpet Artist
www.dflorestrumpet.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etc-etc Heavyweight Member
Joined: 19 Jan 2008 Posts: 6187
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bflatman wrote: | I love this thread
In the 19th century the song "The man who broke the bank at Monte Carlo" was about a real life man who broke the bank in a casino in Monte Carlo by recording every number at roulette that came up for a month.
He was an engineer and reasoned that minute eccentricities and differences in the wheel would favour some numbers, and he was right.
Brass when it is made is not guaranteed to be totally uniform but its pretty uniform. They cant mix it with a wooden spoon when is molten, so there is bound to be some minute zonal variance in concentrations of copper, zinc and other elements throughout the alloy.
I would suggest that this variance might contribute to this clocking experience, in addition to the other factors already postulated.
Empirical testing has revealed some credence for this effect and I for one love the idea that it is real and will insist however illogically that I perceive it as well whether I do or not. |
The non-uniformity of brass alloy is indeed another source of variation - absolutely! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MrOlds Heavyweight Member
Joined: 25 Apr 2003 Posts: 724 Location: California
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
With some pieces I sense there is an ideal orientation. But the amount of magic I get from finding the best orientation is minimal. I place my mouthpiece in the same orientation each time to eliminate one (minor) variable.
There is far more variability day to day with all the stuff on the organic side the mouthpiece. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paladin53 Regular Member
Joined: 27 Sep 2015 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, what about a mouthpiece cut for Reeves Sleeves?
Does the sleeve have to find its special place on the mouthpiece too?
Just what test does one do to determine the best position of the mouthpiece.
Is it just the sound, slotting, intonation, are all affected?
I would like to see a top notch pro do a blind test and see if he-she could repeat the best position. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trumanjazzguy Veteran Member
Joined: 18 Apr 2011 Posts: 403 Location: St. Louis, MO…or wherever the Ship I’m on is!
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I "clock" a number of my favorite mouthpieces. I clock them for comfort purposes only. The most modern piece I play is from the early 90's before CNC was common. I find certain areas of the bite are softer or sharper. I always put the softest discernible spot of the rim bite to my top lip, which, for me, takes the majority of the pressure and needs to be softer.
I play a Burbank 90's era Marcinkiewics E8 R Baptist and a 60's era Holton 66 mouthpiece. I find putting the softest spot of the rim to the middle of my top lip gives me much better endurance. Whatever plays easier will ultimately sound better... _________________ TPT: Nova LA
CRN: Getzen 1950’s W/5.5in bell
FL: Jupiter 1100R
‘Pieces:
TPT: 34-throat shallow double-cup, Chet Baker’s Custom Schilke, Bach Corp 3, Bach Mt. Vernon 6C, Ken Titmus BF Custom(s).
CRN: NY Giardinelli 7SV.
FL: Yamaha Bobby Shew |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|