• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Easy playing medium bore horns


Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Vin DiBona
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2003
Posts: 1473
Location: OHare area

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FYI, the great Malcolm McNab used a Bach 38 medium bore for years. His new Exquisite model is also a medium bore. Malcolm, as does Bobby Shew, state you must be efficient to make the best use of a medium bore horn. Overblowers need not apply.
Gerard Schwarz used a medium bore Bach 37 Bb and a 239 bell medium large bore C in his symphonic days in the NY Philharmonic. He only concern about horns was the sound he got from them.
R. Tomasek
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
halfgreek12
Veteran Member


Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 201
Location: Albany, NY

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin Handcraft Imperials are really nice I think-- versatile and easy to play. The 37 bells play a little more focused (ie legit/lead) and the lion/m bell ones are more committee like.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deleted_user_19c01b1
New Member


Joined: 03 Apr 1996
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks to everyone for listing their toys Seriously, thank you for the many comments, we made it to page #2!

So there was a lot of talk about Martin Committees, which is great because people here seem to have a preference for either the #2 or #3 bore version. Some said the #2 (medium?) is easy to play, and some mentioned that the #3 (large?) has that amazing tone.

Is that the difference? How do the tones produced compare?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
matthes93401
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 641

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The leadpipe to the rotors is shorter in length ( in a rotary) than the tubing to the Pistons in a piston trumpet. You may not find the same feel in piston trumpets in same key of any valve bore size. But I think I get what you're saying about the quicker response you enjoy on the rotary trumpet. For me, playing a D piston trumpet, with its shorter length, feels quick and resposive. Same thing with a piccolo trumpet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shofarguy
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Posts: 7012
Location: AZ

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My theory on bore and its effect and purpose is as follows:

The bore size is relative to how much energy is required to sustain a fully resonant sound. The smaller bore horns "light up" earlier in the dynamic range compared to large bore horns. Small bore horns generally work well for venues that want the full trumpet voice at low dynamics, such as recording studios where signal bleed needs to be controlled.

Large bore horns are great for open spaces like live theater venues, arenas and stadiums. They take a higher volume of energy and fill up larger spaces with sound.

As was said before, the bell and lead pipe shift the balance of playing characteristics. For instance the A-6 Constellation clone uses a large bell and open lead pipe to achieve a bigger, bolder sound, overall. But, it still plays with rich resonance at low volumes. Even its open wrap relieves some of the restrictive feel of the medium bore size and delays the high brilliance that comes with tighter radii.

At the other end of the spectrum lies the Holton ST 301-MF. It has a .468" bore and open lead pipe, but a very tight bell taper with a very fast flare. That supports the upper register more than a standard rate taper would give such a big bore. Just the thing a company might spec for an upper register specialist that also likes a "romantic" sound and phrasing.

The ML bore range fits very well in most sectional ensembles where the sound of the whole must fit in with the rest of the band or orchestra. The MLP range is great for stage bands where the volume needs to be up to match amplified instruments, but doesn't need to do so all by itself.

The big boys, like the Wild Thing, X-4, Meha and CG are there to dominate big spaces and ensembles.
_________________
Brian A. Douglas

Flip Oakes Wild Thing Bb Trumpet in copper
Flip Oakes Wild Thing Flugelhorn in copper


There is one reason that I practice: to be ready at the downbeat when the final trumpet sounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HERMOKIWI
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 2581

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have several small bore horns (Schilke, King Silvertone, Martin Committee, various Conn horns, etc.). I don't know that they are easier to play per se. I think the main difference between a large bore and a small bore is that it's easier to play the large bore louder without overblowing the horn.

So, if you're going to play at less than insane volume levels a small bore horn will work great. Whether it takes less effort to play at any given volume level on a small bore compared to a large bore is a matter of opinion/personal perception and would vary from horn to horn (some "small bores" are small at the second valve slide but large everywhere else - there's no guaranteed consistency to what a "small bore" actually is throughout the entire horn).
_________________
HERMOKIWI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Seymor B Fudd
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 1469
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:10 am    Post subject: Re: Easy playing medium bore horns Reply with quote

peter777 wrote:
Seymor B Fudd wrote:
peter777 wrote:
I am an intermediate student, and out of curiosity tried a rotary and liked it so much that I only practice on that and have not touched my medium-large bore piston trumpet for a long time. It is a very easy-playing horn - requires very little air and I find it very easy to jump between partials. It has a much smaller bore than a piston trumpet and I attribute the ease of playing to that- I read somewhere on these forums that players think the Schilke B6, B7 are also easy to play because of their medium bore.

To the trumpeters who play larger bore horns, do you find the medium-bore horns easier to play but you don't like them for other reasons? Or, for you the larger bores are just as easy to play and they have some other advantages?

Thank you,
Peter


My lifetime trumpet up to now has been a King Super 20 Symphony DB.
A fine instrument which has served me well during 46 years - still in very good condition (not the lacquer). In my efforts to occupy a lead chair I came across the Bach Commercial 1B Medium Large and I have to admit that the Bach is far more easy to play, besides not at all that heavy.
I tested a lot of trumpets (Yamahas, Stomvis, Bachs, Getzens, Hub van Laar) up to this buy but, the Bach was the one for me. The Hub van Laar was also very easy to play (B3).
An important variable is the tone color - do you want brighter or darker sound - what´s the main setting for you, concert band, big band?
My Bach is much brighter than the King (which however pushed hard can penetrate a bigband trumpetsection).


Thanks. I couldn't find information about the King Super, so was that the smaller bore of the two, and you are saying that the larger bore turned out to be easier for you? Or the other way around? Which one is the brighter?

At this point, I'm just learning, and not concerned with the tone for a particular style of music. Simply, I just appreciate the ease of playing because it lets me focus on music - playing etudes, practicing arpeggios, etc.



Oh, sorry! My King was produced 1970 - so its an oldie. I think that it is a larger bore variant compared to the Bach. The Bach Commercial is a "light weight" horn which might have something to do with the ease.
But in my experience, of course limited to me, I´ve found it difficult to judge which kind of bore is the most easy one. Once I bought a Stradivarius (Bach) cornet Large Bore and was utterly unable to fill it. On the other hand, most of my life I played on a Getzen Eterna Cornet, Large Bore, no problems at all. To this horn I used a Bach 1 1/4 - very broad, "carrying", sometimes a bit too bright sound. My present cornet is a Getzen Custom Series (probably same as 3850) probably Medium Bore and compared to the Eterna darker, more "core" and a bit more heavy to play. MPC DW Ultra 7C which means deeper, darker, more "circumscribed" - hence more suited to the contemporary brass band sound.

So complicated. The choice of mouthpiece very delicate; some horns open up others become airsuckers.....as always you will have to find out IRL!
You are a young man so I think you´re fully capable to fill most horns - I wouldn´t worry too much!
_________________
Cornets: mp 143D3/ DW Ultra 1,5 C
Getzen 300 series
Yamaha YCRD2330II
Yamaha YCR6330II
Getzen Eterna Eb
Trumpets:
Yamaha 6335 RC Schilke 14B
King Super 20 Symphony DB (1970)
Selmer Eb/D trumpet (1974)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deleted_user_19c01b1
New Member


Joined: 03 Apr 1996
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for clarifying that Seymor.

And thanks again everybody for the comments.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group