View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Walter Bone Regular Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2018 Posts: 36 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:01 am Post subject: Beginner on a big mouthpiece, Bb trumpet |
|
|
Hello everyone, this is my first post here.
This is truly an amazing place where I gathered copious amounts of valuable information.
Now, my very first question:
following the advice of Schilke himself and other fellows, the advice being "get the largest mouthpiece you can find and can play in orther to buld a strong embouchure", I got a Schilke 24 and practicing on it for 2 months now. I have had no problems so far with this approach, given that I have quite full lips. I feel more muscles are involved and getting stronger.
But, are there downsides to this that I am not aware of? Could be there grim consequences in the long run? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LSOfanboy Veteran Member
Joined: 08 Jul 2018 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:38 am Post subject: Re: Beginner on a big mouthpiece, Bb trumpet |
|
|
Walter Bone wrote: | Hello everyone, this is my first post here.
This is truly an amazing place where I gathered copious amounts of valuable information.
Now, my very first question:
following the advice of Schilke himself and other fellows, the advice being "get the largest mouthpiece you can find and can play in orther to buld a strong embouchure", I got a Schilke 24 and practicing on it for 2 months now. I have had no problems so far with this approach, given that I have quite full lips. I feel more muscles are involved and getting stronger.
But, are there downsides to this that I am not aware of? Could be there grim consequences in the long run? |
Hi,
In my opinion (which you can choose to heed or discard as you see fit), there is not a big problem with using a very large mouthpiece like that. It may provide some difficulties down the line if you decide you want to get into higher note playing (either lead playing or baroque stuff- different styles but the range requirements are similar) and need to switch to a shallower or smaller diameter mouthpiece. The difference between a (Bach for example) 3C and a 3D or 3E is much smaller than trying to move onto a 3D/3E from a schilke 24 (bigger than the biggest Bach). But if you don't see that as a realistic prospect, and are happy with your playing direction and the mouthpiece, it is perfectly acceptable to stay on the 24.
What is actually a much bigger concern to me is your overall approach to development. Whilst your comments are logical, it is important to realise that playing the trumpet well is not an exercise in strength but an exercise in fine balance and control. Yes, there are elements of strength and power involved (the majority of which is in the intercostal muscles required for forced exhalation and not in the obicularis oris (the muscle around the lip)), but focusing on 'building muscles' like a gym regime will only lead to excess tension and a very inefficient playing approach. We are dealing with a tiny delicate vibration between our lips and we have to tend to and cultivate this rather than thinking about building huge concrete supports around the edge of it. You want to think about creating the best sound, with maximum resonance, with the minimum amount of effort, rather than looking to increase your strength in order to put even more effort in! One example I would give would be Doc Severinson, he is now in his 90s and still playing marvellously well. Regardless of his 'strength' in his younger days, at his age now he cannot possess the same strength as a man a third of his age. He is a perfect example of precision and balanced developed in order to play with amazing efficiency and I hope stands as proof that the game is about that and not about massive power and strength.
I hope these comments can help a little and let me know if you are interested in any further information.
All the best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Walter Bone Regular Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2018 Posts: 36 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the reply.
I am right now in the phase of realising what you say. I am reading right now trumpet literature that is more focused on breathing and wind power, such as "Altissimo Trumpet Playing by David H Lynch (other books recommendations?).
I must say that from a beginner viewpoint "building muscles" makes more sense than to more seasoned players, I'm only 8 months in and I still remember when my facial muscles were weak as butter and it was my n.1 limiting factor.
Another thing is that I find a quite dominant tendency among "YouTube teachers" to just boil the whole business down to "it's just like building muscles at the gym". I hear this thing a lot, but no matter how much strength you have in muscles if when playing high notes you cut the blood flow off and kill your chops. I'm learning that playing efficiently is very, very important. This is quite misleading.
This said, I consider the 24 as my practice mouthpiece, I don't think I will use it for actually play the instrument when times will be ripe. I own other mouthpieces (Yamaha Bobby Shew Jazz, 11b4, 16d) and use them as well along with the big Schilke. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delano Heavyweight Member
Joined: 18 Jan 2009 Posts: 3118 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bad idea, switching mouthpieces at random is also a bad idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zaferis Heavyweight Member
Joined: 03 Nov 2011 Posts: 2322 Location: Beavercreek, OH
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Use the 11b4, and put all the others in a shoe box for experimentation in the future (years).
Yes, there is a modicum on muscle stregth build up that happens over time, BUT it really is a small portion of playing the trumpet. Breath control, oral position (syllables), lip vibration, and finger coordination that are bigger concerns.
I contend that your muscles are already strong enough, but you are playing the trumpet so ineficiently that you're working too hard and feeling the fatigue because of THAT, not because the muscles are weak.
The "size" of the mouthpiece is more related to the trumpet than it is to your face - most (yes, like in everything you can find examples of fringes on both ends-large and small) - BUT MOST accomplished players use mouthpieces that are within a small range of size. IMO because it has to balance the size of the instrument. (you wouldn't expect a trumpet and trombone to use the same mouthpiece - right?)
Dig up some of Jens Lindemann's comments on mouthpiece choice..
Find a teacher, work through some beginning -> intermediate -. advanced method books and spend your time in the "SHED". There are no shortcuts. _________________ Freelance Performer/Educator
Adjunct Professor
Bach Trumpet Endorsing Artist
Retired Air Force Bandsman |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Walter Bone Regular Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2018 Posts: 36 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
delano wrote: | Bad idea, switching mouthpieces at random is also a bad idea. |
Can you elaborate on this, please?
zafelis wrote: | Use the 11b4, and put all the others in a shoe box for experimentation in the future (years). |
I feel the 11b4 way too small. I feel uncomfortable with it. I'd rather use the Bobby Shew.
Anyway, why you advocate small mouthpieces for beginners? Any particular reason beyond that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delano Heavyweight Member
Joined: 18 Jan 2009 Posts: 3118 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Schilke 24 is ridiculously big and must be considered to be a specialistic thing. For beginners it seems right to start somewhere in the middle, in Schilke terms, something from 11 to 14, Bach 7 to 3. Everything extreme shallow or extreme big is for specialist’s use. The 11B4 is not very small, remember that after the Schilke 24 EVERY mouthpiece will feel small. The advice above for the 11B4 is ok. And if you play a mp, stay with it at least for a few months, changing mp’s all the time makes no sense, you need time on a mp to get used to it. BTW if you succeed in getting a good sound on the 11B4 you learned how to play. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delano Heavyweight Member
Joined: 18 Jan 2009 Posts: 3118 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Add: the whole muscle thing is BS. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LSOfanboy Veteran Member
Joined: 08 Jul 2018 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I'll jump back in!
Whilst I think he might be being a little bit harsh about it, I agree with all of Delano's comments.
It doesn't make any sense to change mouthpieces; you don't possess the abilities to benefit from changing, so all it can do is confuse your face.
The idea of using a huge mouthpiece as a 'practice' mouthpiece is not very clever. See the earlier comments about balance and efficiency rather than muscle and power...
Hope this can help.
All the best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Walter Bone Regular Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2018 Posts: 36 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you all very much.
I'm still making baby steps so every insight is precious.
On the subject of changing MPs, my humble "experience" so far is that coming down from a bigger rim diameter to a smaller one is way easier than the opposite: this is why practicing on the 24 made sense to me.
The trumpet I bought (a modest Yamaha 2330) came with the 11b4 and the Bobby Shew. Then I bought the 16d, and it was harder. Then came the Schilke 24 and was still harder, even though it's not this unplayable monster IMHO. Yes it is big, but it has a standard C cup and a modest 26 drill throat.
Now, given that the smallers MPs I have aren't completely on the opposite spectrum on the playing characteristics, ie they are not extreme screamers like a 14a4a or a MP JetTone, I don't find switching back to them particularly traumatic. Yep they feel smaller but I don't feel the need to change the embouchure.
I will evaluate to get back to the 11b4, anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brassmusician Veteran Member
Joined: 25 Feb 2016 Posts: 273
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I beg to differ on the idea that muscular strength of the embouchure is a minor aspect of playing the trumpet. What is the reason a player cannot sustain a page of continuous playing in the middle upper register - say getting through "The trumpet shall sound" in the Messiah? What is the reason a player cannot last through a gig of intense playing? - the embouchure muscles give out, they cannot sustain the effort. There is not a trumpet player alive that has not experienced this physical evidence of the need for muscular strength. Of course the caveat is that good technique, use of air and an efficient embouchure will make the muscles last a lot longer. But to discount or downplay the need for muscular strength in the embouchure, is in my view, misleading. _________________ Cannonball 789RL
Yamaha 635ST
Yamaha 16C4
Wick 2BFL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
deanoaks Regular Member
Joined: 02 Apr 2015 Posts: 75 Location: US
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Full disclosure, I had to look up what exactly a Schilke 24 was thinking people were being silly to call it a specialists mouthpiece and holy ****. I thought I played big mouthpiece...
If you find it working for yourself and satisfying all of your musical needs then I don't see a reason to switch until you find yourself limited by your equipment in a musical context. With a larger mouthpiece, those pitfalls would be endurance, range, projection (higher overtones in sound), flexibility, and so on.
I personally started on a Bach 2B because that's just what there was around and it happened to be such a good fit that I did not change sizes until I left college.
The short answer- Do whatever gets the job done. If this mouthpiece is working for you then do not question it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheiden Heavyweight Member
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Posts: 8911 Location: Orange County, CA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I had to guess, the percentage of players who thrive on a Schilke 24 are in the low single digits if not less than 1%. The number of qualified teachers who would recommend a student start on a Schilke would be a tiny fraction of that.
Trumpet playing certainly does involve strength, but as much or more it's about balance and coordination. Most players are going to find a mouthpiece size somewhere between the extremes that facilitates finding this balance. If the Yamaha 11/Bach 7 size rim doesn't fit don't hesitate to try the Yamaha 14/Bach 3 size rim. Even the Yamaha 16/Bach 1.5 is more reasonable choice than the Schilke 24. Note that Schilke and Yamaha are numbered about the same.
If you've not read it I recommend finding and reading the "Mouthpiece Rant" by Jens Lindemann.
https://www.trumpetherald.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26763 _________________ "I'm an engineer, which means I think I know a whole bunch of stuff I really don't."
Charles J Heiden/So Cal
Bach Strad 180ML43*/43 Bb/Yamaha 731 Flugel/Benge 1X C/Kanstul 920 Picc/Conn 80A Cornet
Bach 3C rim on 1.5C underpart |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LSOfanboy Veteran Member
Joined: 08 Jul 2018 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
brassmusician wrote: | I beg to differ on the idea that muscular strength of the embouchure is a minor aspect of playing the trumpet. What is the reason a player cannot sustain a page of continuous playing in the middle upper register - say getting through "The trumpet shall sound" in the Messiah? What is the reason a player cannot last through a gig of intense playing? - the embouchure muscles give out, they cannot sustain the effort. There is not a trumpet player alive that has not experienced this physical evidence of the need for muscular strength. Of course the caveat is that good technique, use of air and an efficient embouchure will make the muscles last a lot longer. But to discount or downplay the need for muscular strength in the embouchure, is in my view, misleading. |
With no intention of causing any confrontation, I would politely disagree with you.
Professional players achieve the necessary endurance, range and power through efficiency and not strength (granted, we do build some strength, but it is only a small part of our overall development). As I said earlier in the thread, endurance is increased primarily by learning to play using less effort rather than simply developing more strength. That is why top players can look so relaxed when they play- if they were genuinely X many times stronger than an amateur you would see it reflected in their body use.
Watch a player like Adam Rapa; he isn't a massive chap and can play a double C with one hand whilst simultaneously rolling around on the floor, that isn't strength- its efficiency. He will also (as with many other top pros) happily play high Gs above high C all day long without waning; again, that isn't strength, its efficiency. Think of the number of amateur players who struggle to sustain pitches an octave lower than that, are they really that much physically weaker than someone like Adam?
Hope that provides some useful discussion points.
All the best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Walter Bone Regular Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2018 Posts: 36 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just for the sake of discussion, I found an article that I read a while ago:
http://storkcustom.com/how-your-lips-dictate-your-mouthpiece-choice/
Scrolling down a bit you can see a chart with photos of various lips sizes and shapes, and a recommended rim diameter.
What you think? Is it garbage? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LSOfanboy Veteran Member
Joined: 08 Jul 2018 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I can only give my opinion and experience. Phyllis Stork knows an awful lot about mouthpieces and, at the end of the day; I make my living playing the trumpet and she makes her's by knowing mouthpieces, so I highly doubt anything she says is 'garbage'.
That being said; I don't agree with the whole 'big lips means a big mouthpiece' thing. There are many many examples of guys (and without wanting to stereotype in any way), predominantly of African or Afro-American origin with very thick lips who sound fantastic on small equipment. At the end of the day we are talking about the control of a very tiny aperture in the centre (ish) of our lips; doesn't matter whether you have the thinnest or fattest lips the aperture is still the same so I don't think anyone is really limited by that theory. A couple of names who spring to mind on the 'big lips, small (or at least not 'large') mouthpiece' spectrum are: Rashawn Ross, Jon Faddis, Freddie Hubbard and Clifford Brown.
Of course, bottoming out is a problem, but that is far more to do with the depth of the cup and your lip protrusion rather than diameter.
In the most polite way possible; it is starting to come across like you are defending a point which many experienced players have disagreed with. The crux of the discussion here is that a Schilke 24 is an extreme mouthpiece. 'Big' mouthpieces are like your Bach 1 1/2s. 1/4s and 1s or Schilke 15-18. The 24 is way larger and very much in a specialist zone. If you imagine another beginner saying they were playing to learn on a 5A4a then you'd say that was not a clever decision, the same is happening here but you are appearing a little reluctant to accept the point.
I hope that can help a little bit. Ultimately, it is your playing and therefore your decision, but I wouldn't bother coming back with any further defences/justifications because I highly doubt you are going to persuade the members of this thread that 'using a Schilke 24 to build up my strength' is a particular good idea.
All the best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Walter Bone Regular Member
Joined: 15 Aug 2018 Posts: 36 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
LSOfanboy wrote: |
In the most polite way possible; it is starting to come across like you are defending a point which many experienced players have disagreed with.
I hope that can help a little bit. Ultimately, it is your playing and therefore your decision, but I wouldn't bother coming back with any further defences/justifications because I highly doubt you are going to persuade the members of this thread that 'using a Schilke 24 to build up my strength' is a particular good idea.
All the best |
I can assure you it wasn't my intention to defend anything, least of all to persuade anyone in doing anything. Who am I to even think about that? Would you follow the "advices" given by a self proclaimed 8-months-into-trumpet beginner? I think you got something wrong about the attitude of my posts, and frankly I don't quite understand why and I feel sorry about it.
The thing is: is this a forum? Aren't we supposed to discuss over things? If I get an aswer without any explanation, am I in the wrong asking for some? There is maybe an unwritten rule where beginners aren't supposed to question the advices of expert members?
None of what I posted here and above was supposed to be polemic. I apologize if I gave that impression, but there wasn't the slightiest intention by my side. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vin DiBona Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Dec 2003 Posts: 1473 Location: OHare area
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Schilke 24 is a very, very specialized mouthpiece. The only players I know of who use(d) one is the late Wilmer Wise and he went much smaller and a terrific trombone player who used it when he played a slide trumpet. He thought is was tiny!
Do yourself a favor and go somewhat more reasonable in diameter. Try something in Schilke 18 or Bach 1C area. Maybe a Stork 2 or 3 and there are plenty of other reasonably priced mouthpiece out there, too.
Lip size has some bearing, but that is not a 100% science. As a GR dealer, I know of some thick lipped players who use mouthpieces in the 16.5mm and under diameters. The Schilke 24 is 18.29MM!!
Ever see Cat Anderson's upper register mouthpiece? Incredibly small. Cat used around a 3C size for other work. Maynard's mouthpiece was small, too.
Don't fall into the bigger is better trap. Not for a beginner, anyway.
R. Tomasek |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kehaulani Heavyweight Member
Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Posts: 9005 Location: Hawai`i - Texas
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vin DiBona wrote: | Do yourself a favor and go somewhat more reasonable in diameter. Try . . Bach 1C area.
Don't fall into the bigger is better trap. |
This is not a criticism it's just that I'm confused. Aren't these contradictory statements? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LSOfanboy Veteran Member
Joined: 08 Jul 2018 Posts: 347
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
kehaulani wrote: | Vin DiBona wrote: | Do yourself a favor and go somewhat more reasonable in diameter. Try . . Bach 1C area.
Don't fall into the bigger is better trap. |
This is not a criticism it's just that I'm confused. Aren't these contradictory statements? |
A 1C is much more reasonable than a Schilke 24! I don't see the as a contradictory statement at all.
All the best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|