• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Olds Super, Feb. 2021



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dstpt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 1284

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:45 pm    Post subject: Olds Super, Feb. 2021 Reply with quote

Hello to all Olds aficionados. I recently got my first Olds–an Olds Super–from a collector, so now I'm finally learning first-hand about the Olds brand. I did a google search for "olds super site:trumpetherald.com" and got...

https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=olds+super+site:trumpetherald.com&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

...which is a lot to digest. The SN is 11025 and has matching SNs on the valves. It's in very good shape and plays extremely well. Definitely a little brighter than some of the others in my present stable, but definitely an "employable tone," if that's fair wording.

I have found conflicting dates of build for this SN (1938, '39, '41) from three websites so far:

https://www.horn-u-copia.net/serial/Oldslist.html
https://www.trumpetherald.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1052115
https://www.robbstewart.com/olds-trumpet-and-cornet-serial-numbers

This model has an adjustable 1st saddle in addition to the standard adjustable 3rd ring. I notice that silver tone ring (bell garland) has inscribed "Super Olds"...seems like that should read "Olds Super." Funny thing. Maybe it's that way on other Olds models, where the model name comes first?

I've tried to measure the 2nd valve slide inner diameter, but my micrometer is finicky...seems like I should say it's a 0.460 inch, but sometimes it looks to be as small as a 0.453, which I don't think is right. I know that the MV Bach Mercedes was a 0.453, except the last 10% or so of them were made a little larger at a 0.456, and I recently sold one of the latter to a local jazz player who had that exact model as his first tpt. (How much do I need to spend on a really good micrometer. Mine only cost $20 or so and has the LED readout.) When I measure my Eclipse with MAW valves, it seems to consistently read as a 0.460.

This Olds lights up very easily, so I wouldn't be surprised if it was a little smaller bore than my other ML bore horns. Then again, maybe that's more the nickel silver playing into the tonal profile. The valves and slides on this puppy are fantastic, though, and the compression still seems solid. I'm guessing this horn sat in a closet for a very long time. It has brass valve balusters. I think I've seen some with stainless steel uppers.

Lastly, of all the Olds models, where would you put the Super in your list, and what do you like better about any other models? Just curious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Goby
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 650

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Pre-War Super is my favorite Olds. Robb Stewart's list is the most accurate, which puts your horn at 1941 construction. 14,000 marks the US's entry into WWII, and Olds stopping their production because brass was needed for the war. Post-WWII Super's had a brass tone ring due to a nickel shortage, and some speculate that these horns are made of brass from melted shell-casings. Your horn should be a ML (.459") bore, but maybe it was a one-off special order in M bore. Have you measured the other slides and tuning slide diameters to see if they all match? Also, the inscription "Super Olds" is totally normal. It should have wings engraved alongside the make and model.

Ranking the Olds line up, at the time of your horn's manufacture, it would have gone as follows:

Super Recording
Super
Standard
Special

Go back a couple more years, and you would see the French Model as the top of the line trumpet (predating the super), and the Military Model somewhere in the middle. There was also a Symphony model trumpet available in a few bore sizes.

After WWII (circa 1948) Olds introduced a few new models and spun off the Super-Recording into the Recording model. The ranking was as follows:

Mendez
Recording
Super
Studio
Special
Ambassador

Personally, I would take a Recording over a Mendez, but the Mendez was a bit more expensive in its day.

A few years later they added the Opera as a competitor to the Martin Committee Large bore and Conn Connstellation. The Opera was more expensive than the Mendez. For whatever reason, the Opera doesn't get much love today, but it's an absolutely killer horn. A major sleeper if you ask me.

Retrospectively, the best Olds were the ones made in the Pre-WWII period, with Super Recordings taking top dollar. The Pre-WWII Super would have been built to the same quality, but isn't as sought after because it isn't as rare. Those early Supers and SR's had so much hand work done with the engraved nickel ring, nickel knuckles in-between pistons (we're talking 4-digit serial numbers for that), dual adjustable slide hooks, trombone water keys, "airplane style" braces from leadpipe to bell. All relics of a bygone era of design. For my money, the Pre-WWII supers are the best, since they have all the hand work of the early Super Recordings, but aren't nearly as expensive. LA Recording models made around 1950 are my favorite to collect because there are a few variants in valve block shape and engraving, and the materials are beautiful.


In terms of overall quality of manufacture and consistency, the early Fullerton horns are probably the best. LA instruments are more collectable, but Fullerton was a state-of-the-art facility. By that time, the designs were less artisanal and more "modern"; sleek lines and clean profiles were in. Hand engraved tone rings were gone, the Recording engravings were done by hand, but it was a standardized design. The Ambassador was taking the world by storm. I don't think they lost many craftsmen in the move to Fullerton, but they definitely upgraded their equipment and had a lot more space to make horns. After 1967, quality took a nosedive (most noticeable on the student horns), but there were still a few nice horns being made. The Clark Terry signature models are super collectable, as are the shepherd's crook Ambassador cornets. The custom series trumpets from that era are supposed to be nice, and they had a "Custom High Range" model which had a very narrow bell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dstpt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 1284

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now THAT'S what I'm talking about, Goby! Yeah! Thanks for some serious input.

Last edited by dstpt on Mon Feb 22, 2021 5:31 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Goby
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 650

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glad you enjoyed my post. I love talking Olds.

Did you check the other slides on your trumpet to see if its a true medium bore?

I'll post reviews of the Olds that I've played/owned tomorrow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dstpt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 1284

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep, definitely a 0.460 bore on all slides. I just have an inconsistent micrometer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EdMann
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 2481
Location: The Big Valley

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dude, I could go on about these horns. I've had a wartime '42 Super as my main jazz horn for almost a decade, brass tone ring, no nickel on the pipe and it came to me with original silver plate, standard for that era. After removing that, the beauty of the horn and attention to detail became apparent. Most important, the brass was thinner-- I had it measured by Robb at one point-- and the moment I played it, i could tell it was special. The intonation was unreal, slots like a mofo, and plays with the ease of a medium bore. But, it's .460, so you can give it some gas.

The rub on Olds has been their thick sound and fat core, and that's true, but with that thinner brass they used during the war, you have a refinement. It's a tremendous horn. Congrats.

ed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
dstpt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 1284

PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, Ed, for sharing as well. Yeah, I think this horn definitely has something special in it. I will spend a little more time on it, but it may be one that I will have to sell due to the fact that Easter is the only gig on the horizon. Regardless, I'll thank you, Goby, and any others for your thorough replies of a history unknown and unexperienced by me until now. For any other response from me, feel free to PM me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yamahaguy
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 3992

PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:19 am    Post subject: Re: Olds Super, Feb. 2021 Reply with quote

dstpt wrote:
I recently got my first Olds–an Olds Super–from a collector, so now I'm finally learning first-hand about the Olds brand.
Same here, had been talking to a close friend of mine for some time about his horns.
He is definitely an Olds fanatic (owns 6 or 7 currently) and has tried all the models.
Being more of a Benge aficionado, I was definitely curious about them and ended up
trying a few at local music stores. Specifically a Recording, Super Recording,
and Mendez. None of them really jived with me, not bad, just not my style.

Then, last November I found and bought my first Super from 1947. It was very
reasonably priced but looked great! Well, later came to find out it had been
re-lacquered and a little red-rot was hidden from me. It still sounded amazing!
I was VERY pleased with how well this horn responded. Much like Ed Mann said,
"The intonation was unreal, slots like a mofo, and plays with the ease of a medium bore."
I sent it to my friend to get his opinion and he went nuts over it! Said it was
one of the best he has ever played and wanted to buy it. He had spare parts
and could replace the rot with NOS.

Lo and behold, a day or two later a '41 popped up in the Marketplace and
I jumped on it! While a little different than the '47 I like it a whole lot more!
This one definitely has a sweeter sound and the nickel silver ring vs. the brass
which I really like the look of! Pleasantly surprised at how many different
tone colors this horn can produce with slight changes in the mouthpiece/bb.
A ton of fun to play with for sure!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bixtone
Veteran Member


Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 162

PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just for the record, Olds did make a few medium bore Supers. I owned one, an early prewar model, that was .453. I’ve only seen one other in that bore size.
_________________
Besson MEHA
NY Bach
Shires
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dstpt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 1284

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 1:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dstpt wrote:
Yep, definitely a 0.460 bore on all slides. I just have an inconsistent micrometer.

I bought a new caliper/micrometer from Amazon in the $35 range. My other one was $10 from The Home Depot. I am too lazy to remove the 3rd slide catch (again! once was enough to clean the horn and polish inner slides!), but I have measured the inner legs to the 1st & 2nd slides, and I am now consistently getting a .456 bore, which would be like the 1960 MV Bach Mercedes I recently sold. Again, this Olds Super is dated at 1941/42. Any thoughts? I guess it could be that I've been slightly tilting the micrometer, so that it's resulting in a little more length and would mean that it's really a .453.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deleted_user_687c31b
New Member


Joined: 03 Apr 1996
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dstpt wrote:
dstpt wrote:
Yep, definitely a 0.460 bore on all slides. I just have an inconsistent micrometer.

I bought a new caliper/micrometer from Amazon in the $35 range. My other one was $10 from The Home Depot. I am too lazy to remove the 3rd slide catch (again! once was enough to clean the horn and polish inner slides!), but I have measured the inner legs to the 1st & 2nd slides, and I am now consistently getting a .456 bore, which would be like the 1960 MV Bach Mercedes I recently sold. Again, this Olds Super is dated at 1941/42. Any thoughts? I guess it could be that I've been slightly tilting the micrometer, so that it's resulting in a little more length and would mean that it's really a .453.

What I'm about to write may not actually be true but...I seem to remember reading somewhere that, in order to keep the blow resistance of a trumpet the same regardless of whether a valve is pressed or depressed, the valve slides were given a slightly larger bore. Have you measured the tuning slide to see what bore size that gives?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dstpt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 1284

PostPosted: Sat Feb 27, 2021 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hibidogrulez wrote:
...Have you measured the tuning slide to see what bore size that gives?

I have now measured the tuning slide, and it is also consistently measuring a .456. This is done merely by measuring the inner dimensions of the slides, however, last night I thought about also measuring the outer dimensions, then the thickness of the tubing and multiplying by 2, and then subtracting the latter from the former...and I still consistently get a .456.

Outer dimension = .490
Thickness of tubing = .017 x 2 = .034
.490 - .034 = .456

Go figure...speaking figuratively.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deleted_user_687c31b
New Member


Joined: 03 Apr 1996
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2021 2:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guess that petty much confirms that what I wrote doesn't apply to your Super. I have no idea why the bore size is what it is then, though what some of the other posters wrote seems plausible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bixtone
Veteran Member


Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 162

PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2021 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My.453 Super was from around 1938. Olds also made a large bore “Symphony” Super that was around .468 IIRC. So there was some variation in bore size, at least in the earlier years of production.
_________________
Besson MEHA
NY Bach
Shires
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group