View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Brassnose Heavyweight Member
Joined: 07 Mar 2016 Posts: 1815 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 9:35 pm Post subject: Bb to C conversion - who does it? |
|
|
I know there have been discussions in the forum about Bb to C conversions and its pros and cons - I don’t want to discuss this here. Rather I’d like to know who will do this type of work.
It strikes me as really odd that this seems to be a American/UK thing. I do have a horn that I have been thinking about converting and while doing this also adding an exchangeable bell to be able to change the sound character when needed (brilliant, classical C sound vs. almost flugel-like in small woodwind ensemble). No instrument maker here in Germany was supportive of the idea; they all claimed that it would ruin the horn, freak out intonation etc etc.
So: who of the instrument makers does conversions to usable C horns? _________________ 2019 Martin Schmidt eXcellence
1992 Bach 43GH/43
1989 Kühnl & Hoyer Model 15 flugel
1980/2023 Custom Blessing Scholastic C 😎
1977 Conn 6B
196x/7x Hüttl Silver Colibri 69
1951 Buescher 400 Lightweight
AR Resonance/Klier/Curry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LittleRusty Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 12544 Location: Gardena, Ca
|
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am curious why you are focused on converting a Bb rather than modifying a C to have the features like an exchangeable bell.
Is it that you already have a Bb? Or maybe you have a Bb that has some characteristics that you want in a C?
I am not trying to derail your thread and if your response is that you don’t want to go there that is fine.
Are you looking for techs only in Germany? Or in the EU? Or is an US tech acceptable?
There are some US techs whose names come up regularly on conversion topics. James Becker posts on here regularly and does conversions. Charlie Melk is another who is mentioned.
One other thought, perhaps you might want to consider making your exchangeable bells also tunable bells. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brassnose Heavyweight Member
Joined: 07 Mar 2016 Posts: 1815 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good point. The main reason is that, indeed, I have a Bb lying around that I don’t use. Two Bb, in fact. I haven’t thought about going from C to C. Will need to think about that one, too. Customs wise and considering the shipping and all that, Europe would probably be easier, but US or Canada are on my radar as well. _________________ 2019 Martin Schmidt eXcellence
1992 Bach 43GH/43
1989 Kühnl & Hoyer Model 15 flugel
1980/2023 Custom Blessing Scholastic C 😎
1977 Conn 6B
196x/7x Hüttl Silver Colibri 69
1951 Buescher 400 Lightweight
AR Resonance/Klier/Curry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
James Becker Heavyweight Member
Joined: 02 Sep 2005 Posts: 2827 Location: Littleton, MA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suggest a Bach C180L238 or Yamaha’s equivalent will their U bell. The reason being these bell shapes were designed specifically for C trumpet. Having converted a Bach Bb 180-72 to C many years ago at the request of it’s owner I wouldn’t recommend it. The pitch was dreadful because the bell was too wide. Since the Bach and Yamaha bells mentioned are more proportionately appropriate for the key of C, you will encounter fewer pitch problems.
I hope this is helpful. _________________ James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com
Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brassnose Heavyweight Member
Joined: 07 Mar 2016 Posts: 1815 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting info, thanks. That would mean I’d need to purchase two bells. Need to do the math, but will consider it. _________________ 2019 Martin Schmidt eXcellence
1992 Bach 43GH/43
1989 Kühnl & Hoyer Model 15 flugel
1980/2023 Custom Blessing Scholastic C 😎
1977 Conn 6B
196x/7x Hüttl Silver Colibri 69
1951 Buescher 400 Lightweight
AR Resonance/Klier/Curry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
OldSchoolEuph Heavyweight Member

Joined: 07 Apr 2012 Posts: 2334
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 6:50 am Post subject: Re: Bb to C conversion - who does it? |
|
|
Brassnose wrote: | I do have a horn that I have been thinking about converting and while doing this also adding an exchangeable bell to be able to change the sound character when needed (brilliant, classical C sound vs. almost flugel-like in small woodwind ensemble). |
Mr. Becker has made an excellent suggestion of a Bach 238 bell, which is known for imbuing a C trumpet with the timbre of a Bb. If you were to locate an affordable Bach 229, and have it converted to changeable bells and pick up a 238 bell, I would bet that the net cost would be less than cutting down a Bb (especially given that often there is some trial and error recursion to try and balance the intonation quirks) and then securing the appropriate bells.
You would get one of the bells with the horn, so its really a matter of used-horn-price minus bell-price being less than the cost of cutting down the Bb, which I think is a fair bet.
Unfortunately for your situation, everyone I know that does this work well is in the states. _________________ Ron Berndt
www.trumpet-history.com
2017 Austin Winds Stage 466
1962 Mt. Vernon Bach 43
1954 Holton 49 Stratodyne
1927 Conn 22B
1957 Holton 27 cornet
1985 Yamaha YEP-621
1975 Yamaha YEP-321 Custom
1965 Besson Baritone
1975 Olds Recording R-20 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Hollahan Heavyweight Member
Joined: 05 Oct 2005 Posts: 517 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 7:20 am Post subject: Bb to C |
|
|
I did this on several trumpets. It is successful if you measure properly from a C trumpet. As many C trumpets already have intonation problems, cut down seem to have the same intonation problems.
Conversely when I put the C to Bb conversion in my C trumpet, I get the Bb intonation problems one normally gets.
However, one must start with a good Large bore Bb for it to be successful.
For those with a plethora of good Bb horns and a good tech, it might work. However, it usually is easier to buy C trumpet and can be more cost effective _________________ Steve Hollahan
Bach 37, 229 C
Yamaha 9620 D-Eb, 741 C, Flugel
Kanstul 900 piccolo trumpet
Sculptured Recrafting Custom Instrument Repair
and Restoration
www.sculpturedrecrafting.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shawnino Veteran Member
Joined: 27 Jun 2020 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Steve: got a website in English/etc.? I’d be interested to look. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
falado Heavyweight Member
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 896 Location: Eastern NC
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, as I was reading through this thread it reminded me of my journey through C trumpets. I know you didn't want a pro-con, but here's my experiences.
I went on a C safari some time ago when I started playing with a local orchestra. My first C was an old Bach I got from my old college trumpet professor. I think it was a ML horn and boy was it stuffy to me and hard to control the intonation. I found out later he liked stuffy horns, or let's say horns with lots of resistance. At that time my Bb was a Benge 6X, large bore.
I bought a C that was a conversion, intonation was bad and sound wasn't right. I sold the Benge (big mistake) and the old Bach C and bought a new Schilke S22 C with a set of Bb slides figuring it would play the same on both sides. Wow was I wrong. The Bb side was great, I used that horn for lead gigs. But, the C side had all the characteristics of a typical C trumpet. You see, I was looking for a horn that would be easy to back and forth from C to Bb, wrong answer. I had talked to Jim Becker about going back and forth. He blueprinted my C and it was a lot better, but not quite there. All this time he suggested I get a Bach 239C 25A. I finally found a Bach 239 candidate and sent it to him for blueprinting. Viola, I now have a C that not only is a joy to play, but is in my daily routines. I got the C to use with a brass group I've just started, but everything is on hold at the moment due to covid-19 and recent thoracic surgery.
Now the next part, the mouthpiece. I could play on a Schilke 14, but never on a Bach 1 1/2C. Either Jim or Tim Cote at Osmun suggested I try a Bach Symphonic 1 1/2C 24/24. I not only can play it now, it works great and feels almost identical to my Curry 3BC which I use on my Bb.
So, after reading your post and seeing you want to go from flugel like sound withg a ww group to brilliant classical, you might want to try a Curry TF mouthpiece for the darker blend with the woodwind stuff and a C cup, or shallower but keep the same rim, for the brilliant. However, I find that the concept of sound is also in the head of the player. That is, I can change the characteristics of my sound though my mental process and cup depth on the same horn rather than changing bells. Although I understand the bell can change the sound. I had a Lawler TL STS (should have kept that one too) with 2 bells, the Lawler and a Bach Corp. side seam. That Bach bell really made the horn sound sweet. So, you might considered the mouthpiece and going with a Bach C, send it to Jim for blueprinting?
Just some thoughts, sorry it's so long
Dave _________________ FA LA DO (Ab: V/ii) MUCS, USN (Ret.)
Stomvi VR (Reeves) with VR II Bell
Bach 239 25A C, Blueprinted
Bach 37, Early Elkhart, Blueprinted
Kanstul Flugel
Getzen 4 valve Pic.
Yamaha D/Eb
Besson Cornet |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Irving Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2003 Posts: 1828
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you want to convert a Bb Bach trumpet into a C trumpet then any good repairman could do it. It would be a question of buying the proper bell and lead pipe. All of the other parts could be cut down(the valve slides). If it is another brand the then it is a crap shoot. Even with a Bach it is a gamble since you don't know how the horn will turn out. Best bet is sell the horn and buy a C trumpet that you like. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wilder Veteran Member
Joined: 27 Jun 2020 Posts: 341 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't do it. Get a C trumpet. Good luck! jw |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cheiden Heavyweight Member
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Posts: 8904 Location: Orange County, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my limited experience, C trumpet is challenging enough in it's own right. Better to get a C trumpet that does what you need most then see if you can adjust your sound with a different mouthpiece. I think trying to get a chameleon trumpet runs risk of it not doing either particularly well. And if a custom doesn't work out there really is no recourse. If you shop for a single-purpose horn you keep looking until you're satisfied, with little to no risk. _________________ "I'm an engineer, which means I think I know a whole bunch of stuff I really don't."
Charles J Heiden/So Cal
Bach Strad 180ML43*/43 Bb/Yamaha 731 Flugel/Benge 1X C/Kanstul 920 Picc/Conn 80A Cornet
Bach 3C rim on 1.5C underpart |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brassnose Heavyweight Member
Joined: 07 Mar 2016 Posts: 1815 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, there are a few points in the last posts that got me thinking, but first off: I am not thinking about any of the Bb horns in the signature. I’ll keep those and would be stupid to cut any of those up, as they are great for what I use them for (orchestra and big band/funk/pop, respectively). The horn I have in mind is an old Blessing ML bore horn.
And ML indeed is the thing that got me thinking again: I used to own a Getzen Eterna C. I liked the sound but found it quite stuffy despite it being an L bore horn. Converting an ML horn may be even worse ...
I did have a nice experience with my flugel in the ensemble, so I may look for one of these old C flugels that come up from to time and then have that redone if needed, add a trigger etc. For quite some stuff I’d do, a regular C trumpet is just too much (poor flutes). _________________ 2019 Martin Schmidt eXcellence
1992 Bach 43GH/43
1989 Kühnl & Hoyer Model 15 flugel
1980/2023 Custom Blessing Scholastic C 😎
1977 Conn 6B
196x/7x Hüttl Silver Colibri 69
1951 Buescher 400 Lightweight
AR Resonance/Klier/Curry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LittleRusty Heavyweight Member
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 Posts: 12544 Location: Gardena, Ca
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brassnose wrote: |
snip
And ML indeed is the thing that got me thinking again: I used to own a Getzen Eterna C. I liked the sound but found it quite stuffy despite it being an L bore horn. Converting an ML horn may be even worse ...
snip
|
It looks like you don't own the Getzen anymore, but if you did a larger backbore on the mouthpiece, adjusting the gap, checking the valve alignment would all be cheaper route to try than essentially creating a custom horn. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
OldSchoolEuph Heavyweight Member

Joined: 07 Apr 2012 Posts: 2334
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brassnose wrote: | OK, there are a few points in the last posts that got me thinking, but first off: I am not thinking about any of the Bb horns in the signature. I’ll keep those and would be stupid to cut any of those up, as they are great for what I use them for (orchestra and big band/funk/pop, respectively). The horn I have in mind is an old Blessing ML bore horn.
And ML indeed is the thing that got me thinking again: I used to own a Getzen Eterna C. I liked the sound but found it quite stuffy despite it being an L bore horn. Converting an ML horn may be even worse ...
I did have a nice experience with my flugel in the ensemble, so I may look for one of these old C flugels that come up from to time and then have that redone if needed, add a trigger etc. For quite some stuff I’d do, a regular C trumpet is just too much (poor flutes). |
Focusing on the bore is a mistake. The tiny difference in cross-sectional area does virtually nothing to influence how a horn plays. It is those aspects of design/build that are typically packaged with larger bores that matter.
Assuming Getzens are the same as they were in the 70s (and they are still Capri and Eterna so presumably they are), they achieve their brightness and edge through under-annealing the bell relative to the amount of final working, and by achieving tapers to the bell thickness that support that as well. The rest of the horn tends to be a bit if a tank - good from a durability standpoint, less so if you get tired easy.
(And if your Getzen was really stuffy, how tight were the valves? The idea that Getzen valves last forever is a myth. They warrant material and workmanship on the pistons for life because those do last forever, but, other than doing so a little slower because of hand lapping to achieve perfect alignment at the start rather than allowing random wear-in, they still wear away the casings and leak like any other valve. The pistons are warranted against defect, its not a guarantee that the valves wont wear out)
Depending what Blessing model you have, it could be a tank, or it could be pretty light in ML bore. They built a lot of different horns. To achieve the desired tonal properties, with ease, a lighter horn has advantages as a C. However, bracing is another key component both for tone and intonation and most Blessing builds are going to require significant work on that to get good results as a C. A typical Blessing bell is likely to be more "dead" than dark on a C. In the end, you are talking about a lot of labor to create a custom C that, as a Blessing, will have very little resale value.
I still believe you could buy a Bach 229 used, add your flexible bell option with a 238, get exactly what you were looking for, spend less, and have greater potential resale value. _________________ Ron Berndt
www.trumpet-history.com
2017 Austin Winds Stage 466
1962 Mt. Vernon Bach 43
1954 Holton 49 Stratodyne
1927 Conn 22B
1957 Holton 27 cornet
1985 Yamaha YEP-621
1975 Yamaha YEP-321 Custom
1965 Besson Baritone
1975 Olds Recording R-20 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nieuwguyski Heavyweight Member

Joined: 06 Feb 2002 Posts: 2303 Location: Santa Cruz County, CA
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brassnose Heavyweight Member
Joined: 07 Mar 2016 Posts: 1815 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2023 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alright, it’s Wednesday morning and I can’t seem to sleep since about 1 am, so I figured I might as well report back on my Bb to C endeavor. Those of you reading my signature may have noticed the Blessing Franken C. This is it.
I talked to a top tech in my area (and yes, he is American, so these conversions seem to be an Anglo-Saxon thing, even in Central Europe) and he was actually quite forthcoming and positive about it - even said he had done that to a few Ambassadors before.
So, we (the tech, of course) took my Blessing Scholastic Bb and converted it to a very cool C. Replaced the leadpipe with a Malone type hidden reverse pipe, made a new tuning slide (the original had rotted out), adjusted the tubing, used LOADS of the original parts, added a finger hook on 1, etc. etc.
Sound is very nice and quite warm, but if I push it, it gets nice and brilliant, especially with a shallower mouthpiece. I currently use an AR Resonance ME40 cup with a 40L backbore. The L backbore is more open than what I use on the Bach Bb and balances out the ML of the Blessing (now) C very nicely. Intonation and blow are in fact better than before the conversion; the new leadpipe and tuning slide seem to have improved things a lot.
For those worried about money Overall, I’m not even remotely close to the price of a used Bach, as some of you suggested I purchase instead. Happy camper here, just need more time to practice. _________________ 2019 Martin Schmidt eXcellence
1992 Bach 43GH/43
1989 Kühnl & Hoyer Model 15 flugel
1980/2023 Custom Blessing Scholastic C 😎
1977 Conn 6B
196x/7x Hüttl Silver Colibri 69
1951 Buescher 400 Lightweight
AR Resonance/Klier/Curry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Riojazz Heavyweight Member

Joined: 25 Dec 2006 Posts: 982 Location: Mid-Hudson Valley, NY
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2023 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As mentioned, Ivan Hunter. _________________ Matt Finley https://mattfinley.bandcamp.com/releases
Kanstul 1525 flugel with French taper, Shires Bb Destino Med & C trumpets, Schilke XA1 cornet, Schagerl rotary, Schilke P5-4 picc, Yamaha soprano sax, Powell flute. Sanborn GR66MS & Touvron-D. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iiipopes Heavyweight Member

Joined: 29 Jun 2015 Posts: 540
|
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have the opposite experience. I have a Couesnon small bore that has the long main tuning slide in a step bore configuration to convert from a C to a Bb. This trumpet has more consistent tone and intonation in the C configuration, especially with the proprietary mouthpiece that came with the horn.
However the OP may proceed, remember to pull the individual valve slides as well as whatever configuration, whether bell or main tuning slide, or both, is used to lower the pitch from C to Bb. _________________ King Super 20 Trumpet; Sov 921 Cornet
Bach cornet modded to be a 181L clone
Couesnon Flugelhorn and C trumpet |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brassnose Heavyweight Member
Joined: 07 Mar 2016 Posts: 1815 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To be honest, I am slightly confused about those last two posts Three posts up I briefly described the conversion - it’s done and I am very happy with the results.
I now have a very nice C trumpet that cost me about 1/5 of a used Bach C plus I don’t have a horn at home that I don’t use. Not sure what the comment about pulling the slides means. _________________ 2019 Martin Schmidt eXcellence
1992 Bach 43GH/43
1989 Kühnl & Hoyer Model 15 flugel
1980/2023 Custom Blessing Scholastic C 😎
1977 Conn 6B
196x/7x Hüttl Silver Colibri 69
1951 Buescher 400 Lightweight
AR Resonance/Klier/Curry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|