• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Stamps Lips Bends


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> James Stamp
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pat
Veteran Member


Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 396

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would appreciate affirmation or correction from Stamp advocates of my understanding of various concepts I've picked up from working with Stamp, Poper and other Stamp-related materials. The first is the use of lip bends.

From what I have gathered, there are at least 3 ways or reasons to practice lip bends:

1) the first is as Hardenberger recommended in his master classes as reported in the ITG journal a few months ago. He advocates that early in the daily practice you use lip bends from G in the staff down to C to get the proper balance between lip tension and air. He says to use a breath attack and carefully listen to the sound as you do the lip bend until the "gravel" is out of the sound. ---

2) the second is as in one the Stamp exercises in which you play the open harmonic arpeggio down to the pedals and then up to top line G, do a lip bend, and then accelerate the air to the high C. The C is supposed to sound better after using the lip bend.

IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING (and I am not sure where I read this) THAT THE IDEA BEHIND THE LIP BEND IS THAT YOU CAN'T DO IT WELL UNLESS THE MIDDLE PART OF YOUR LIP IS REALTIVELY RELAXED AND PLIABLE, AND THE AIR FLOW IS GOOD. THIS, IN TURN WILL HELP PRODUCE A GOOD VIBRATION AND SOUND. ----(I don't know if he is exaggerating but Hardenberger seems to suggest that if you don't get this balance worked out early in the day, especially when you are stiff, you will have difficulties the rest of the day.)

3) the third reason for lip bends is to strengthen the corners. I am not sure if Stamp advocated this, but Phillip Smith in his CNN interview (which you can read on the Dillon Music site) says he does lip bends for this reason. David Hickman's method also has lip bend exercies to develop lip strength.---- BTW, Hickman says that lip strength necessary to bend a G on the top of the staff, is all you need play the G above high C.(of course you have to use the air correctly too)

Your comments are appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
_PhilPicc
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 15 Jan 2002
Posts: 2286
Location: Clarkston, Mi. USA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is a lip bend? If I know it, it is not by that name.

Thanks,
Phil
_________________
Philip Satterthwaite

We cannot expect you to be with us all the time, but perhaps you could be good enough to keep in touch now and again."
- Sir Thomas Beecham to a musician during a rehearsal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
screamertrumpet
Veteran Member


Joined: 10 Nov 2001
Posts: 170
Location: Washington State

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2002 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pat,
Yes Yes Yes. The main reason why Stamp put that lip bend in his "arppegio" is to make sure that your chops were relaxed so you don't force out the high c.
Lip bends also have another purpose. Make sure you blow through the lip bends and don't let the air down. That's one of the main reasons I do them. With lip bends, you can't get the sound out unless you keep the air going.
Trevor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
trumpetherald
System Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2001
Posts: 1494
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2002 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The lip bends don't really 'make' your embouchure do anything - perhaps a better way to think about it is as a 'test.'

If, when playing the Stamp warmup which uses the bend, you can reach the G on top of the staff and have little enough tension in your embouchure to execute the bend, you're in good shape. If the bend is difficult, breaks, or is not possible, it's a sure sign that there's simply too much tension in the emboucure. So, the bends can promote a more relaxed set by training you to relax enough to execute them...

Also, Tom Stevens advocates only doing a 1/4-tone lip bend, not a full halfstep. The 1/2 step can cause the tone/aperture to spread and cause more problems in the end. It's worth experimenting with in your own playing to see which is more helpful.

And, yes, it does take some strength to execute the lip bends, especially when you move higher. But, the strength has to be a product of working on the bends correctly, not vice-versa - don't try to 'muscle' the bends to make them work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pat
Veteran Member


Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 396

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2002 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To the System Administrator:

For lip strength purposes Hickman's exercises start with a 1/2 step and then progress to 1 and 1/2 steps.(e.g G down to E).(to be done at the last practice session of the day) Would Stevens find pitfalls in using this wide a lip bend for this purpose?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trumpetherald
System Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2001
Posts: 1494
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2002 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hesitate to speak for Tom as I never heard him talk about really wide bends. Let's just say that it's not part of his approach as far as I am aware.

Personally I can see some benefit from working on wide bends, but I wouldn't use them in conjunction with the Stamp drills. With Stamp, you just use them to check that you're staying relaxed and to help keep the 'light steady crescendo' feeling going...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
shofar
Veteran Member


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 231
Location: Rogersville, Tennessee

PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

On 2002-04-01 14:14, trumpetherald wrote:
The lip bends don't really 'make' your embouchure do anything - perhaps a better way to think about it is as a 'test.'

If, when playing the Stamp warmup which uses the bend, you can reach the G on top of the staff and have little enough tension in your embouchure to execute the bend, you're in good shape. If the bend is difficult, breaks, or is not possible, it's a sure sign that there's simply too much tension in the emboucure. So, the bends can promote a more relaxed set by training you to relax enough to execute them...

Also, Tom Stevens advocates only doing a 1/4-tone lip bend, not a full halfstep. The 1/2 step can cause the tone/aperture to spread and cause more problems in the end. It's worth experimenting with in your own playing to see which is more helpful.

And, yes, it does take some strength to execute the lip bends, especially when you move higher. But, the strength has to be a product of working on the bends correctly, not vice-versa - don't try to 'muscle' the bends to make them work.


Great insights Todd...especially the part about the "...test..." So correct. The only thing I would not agree with is only bending 1/4 step. When I was studying with Jimmie, he always had me (I assume us) do a full 1/2 step. It is also stated that way in his bokk on pg 21. "Bend the notes down a half step with lips only..." All the excercises indicate a full 1/2 step as well. I have never found it to cause my "...tone/aperture to spread and cause more problems..." as Tom Stevens states. Actually quite the opposite, my tone has been improved because of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
trumpetherald
System Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2001
Posts: 1494
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Shofar:

Truthfully I've done both the 1/2 & 1/4 step bends and found them both helpful at different stages of my career. It was just rather intriguing to me when Stevens introduced the 1/4 tone bend to me ... I'd always done half-steps and the quarter tones opened up a new thing for me.

The quarter bends are much lighter and helped me get a springier feeling to intervals and a more centered blow.

In retrospect my statement that the 1/2 bends will make you spread was heavy-handed, I do think that wider bends *can* do that but I and many others have certainly used them to good effect ...

Cheers,
TD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
trumpetherald
System Administrator


Joined: 25 Oct 2001
Posts: 1494
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shofar one more thing - this quote:

Quote:
tone/aperture to spread and cause more problems


was not from Stevens, those were my words. I don't recall what he said exactly regarding his rationale for the narrower bends, but I wasn't quoting him. Just to set the record straight ...

TD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
shofar
Veteran Member


Joined: 02 Jun 2003
Posts: 231
Location: Rogersville, Tennessee

PostPosted: Tue May 04, 2004 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey That's cool Todd. I was just replying to your previous post. I am quite sure there are a lot of people who benefit from bends...either 1/4 or 1/2 step bends. But thanks for the clarification. I don't know if you ever had the chance to study directly from Jimmie, but it was quite enjoyable, very helpful, and I would never change that opportunity. Doing the bending exercises was a very important part of his approach.

See ya, Rog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ComposeAl
Regular Member


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Location: Glendale, CA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Folks,

I studied with Jimmy Stamp in the 70's. The lip bend, (lipping a note down a half step) I understood was a way to make sure that one doesn't pull up the pitch on lower notes making it more difficult to play the top note of an arpeggio. In other words, Jimmy used to say that the tendency for most players as they play up an arpeggio to pull up the pitch of the lower notes in anticipation of the higher ones coming. Some players so pull up the pitch that the top note they're aiming for really doesn't exist, it's too sharp and not on the horn.

He used to play along with me an other students. His pitch was so good that he would keep everyone's playing stable and arpeggios were easier to play as were wide intervals. He did this on etudes as well making 7ths, 9ths and even wider intervals really easy to negotiate.

Al
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dbacon
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Nov 2001
Posts: 8592

PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

On 2004-08-20 23:06, ComposeAl wrote:
Hi Folks,

I studied with Jimmy Stamp in the 70's. The lip bend, (lipping a note down a half step) I understood was a way to make sure that one doesn't pull up the pitch on lower notes making it more difficult to play the top note of an arpeggio. In other words, Jimmy used to say that the tendency for most players as they play up an arpeggio to pull up the pitch of the lower notes in anticipation of the higher ones coming. Some players so pull up the pitch that the top note they're aiming for really doesn't exist, it's too sharp and not on the horn.

He used to play along with me an other students. His pitch was so good that he would keep everyone's playing stable and arpeggios were easier to play as were wide intervals. He did this on etudes as well making 7ths, 9ths and even wider intervals really easy to negotiate.

Al


Did he ever discuss this in terms of sound and resonance? Playing in the center of the sound for the fullest resonance and easiest way to play? This has really helped me and it seemed to be a by product of practicing Stamp exercises.

Thanks for your insight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ComposeAl
Regular Member


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Location: Glendale, CA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Dave,

A lot of Jimmy's lessons were him playing along with his students. He was famous for fingering the valves while the student did the blowing and other occasions beating time with his mouthpiece on the plastic cup of his thermos bottle. But much of the musicality, tone quality and intonation was taught by simply hearing him play along. Jimmy often played as I may have mentioned on the earlier post duets, trios and quartets with students staying after their normal lesson to keep playing with the next student. His musicality even on a third part was astounding and catching. He would taper phrases so beautifully with such a centered and gorgeous sound. I would get lost just listening to him. It was so pure and wonderful. He was really a humble, peaceful, gentle and kind person making his elegant playing all the more beautiful. He was truly a wonderful human being who sincerely gave his all to make each of his students the best they could be.

Jimmy played the piano through his buzzing warmups saying that if we could play in tune with the piano that we could play in tune. He played keys with his right hand and buzzed with his left listening carefully to his students. He had us buzz with the left to minimize mouthpiece pressure. He had us play very high as we worked our way up scales. (I was a composition major. I wrote a string trio based on his mouthpiece warmup. He thought that was hilarious.) He was meticulous and insistent on making the mouthpiece buzz well.

He played the piano well enough to accompany us on solos. This is where he talked a great deal about phrasing, making phrases sound like parts of a whole piece, style, playing with a beautiful centered tone, and playing intervals in tune. He could actually play the out of tune notes intrinsic to the trumpet quite well in tune without pushing out a slide or using a false fingering. What was amazing is that he could get his students to do the same by having us sing the note first and then playing them. Again, he used piano tempered pitch as the measure for being in tune.

Measuring intervals correctly, he would often point out, was key to making a piece work properly including actually having the endurance to get through it. He developed lots of exercises that I suspect appear in his books (for some reason I haven't bought them yet) that allow a student to measure over and over the same interval. For example, he would have us play 6th chords just up to the sixth and back down. Specifically, if you started on middle C you would play up the major triad to E, then to G and then up to the A allowing you to mainly measure the major 2nd between G and A. He usually began putting a short fermata on the C to make sure one didn't pull up the pitch of the low C in anticipation of going up the arpeggio. When everything centers and measures properly, your lip vibrates beautifully, the tone is prettier, intonation is excellent and you're more efficient. The efficiency increases your endurance. It's a beautiful thing!

I wonder if there are some recordings of his lessons? That would really be helpful for those who weren't born yet. He was such a peaceful and kind guy. His lessons put me into an alpha state. I can feel that great relaxation just thinking about his lessons and that was exactly thirty years ago for me!!

Thank God for Jimmy Stamp. What a great contributor to the art. I miss him terribly. When I used to play a lot, it was always fun to meet other Stamp students and hear about their experiences.

I've been mainly a composer for the last thirty plus years first in the industry and now I teach full time at Pasadena City College. I haven't played much in the last four years. I recently was diagnosed with asthma so I'm back to playing to improve my lungs. I'm doing Jimmy's stuff everyday and it really works.

Best regards,

Al
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Atomlinson
Veteran Member


Joined: 21 May 2002
Posts: 327
Location: Somerset England

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 1:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great post Al.

It's always interesting to hear of people's experiences with great teachers like Jimmy Stamp.

I hope you will be able to contribute more to this forum.

How do the published Stamp drills (BIM) (if you have them) compare with your own experiences? I've read elsewhere that Jimmy wasn't entirely happy with them. How much of the lesson was taken up with the drills?

Andrew Tomlinson

[ This Message was edited by: Atomlinson on 2004-08-24 09:13 ]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
_Old_mod_account
TH Moderator Group


Joined: 13 Sep 2003
Posts: 887

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ComposeAl:

That's a great post, thanks so much. Although I didn't get to study with him in person, I've always felt and been taught that Stamp's approach was all about efficiency, ease, and center, and his materials and approach really get one to that point if applied properly.

TD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ComposeAl
Regular Member


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Location: Glendale, CA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Andrew and TD,

I must admit that I don't have Jimmy's published exercises. When I studied with him, he was using photocopies in his hand manuscript. I will pick up them up.

One thing that I should point out is that Jimmy would make everyone's exercises into his own by often putting a fermata on the first note and then a fermata or a repeat of the last notes on the top note of an exercise. I noticed somewhere online Clarke's first technical study with a whole measure of repeats on the top two notes. On the first study starting on low F# going up to middle C, Jimmy would have the student repeat C to B, C to B for a whole measure. If this makes any sense, the fermata on the first note insures that the pitch isn't being pulled up to anticipate the higher notes and the repeats at the top insure that the pitch isn't dropped in anticipation of the lower notes.

Incidentally, the lip bends are great when you've really thrashed your chops and have to go on. I used to play with an R n' B band and the playing was brutal. Often just before the last set I would take my horn in the restroom and do a few soft lip bends. I think they loosened the muscles around my lips and got me back to thinking of the center of each note.

Best regards,

Al
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dbacon
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Nov 2001
Posts: 8592

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Al,

Is there anyone in L.A. teaching at the level Stamp did, or Pappy Mitchell , Claude, Irving Bush etc? Who's the "go to" guy these days?

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BigBadWolf
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 3091
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would go and see Boyde Hood. He uses a lot of Stamps ideas and has expanded on them quite a bit.

Kevin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ComposeAl
Regular Member


Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Location: Glendale, CA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Dave,

I think Kevin's right, I've heard that Boyde Hood is excellent.

There is also Uan Rassey who though not a Jimmy student is an institution in his own right. He is the wonderful trumpet soloist in the haunting film China Town starring Faye Dunaway and Jack Nicholson. Also, Mark Garrabrandt who is a wonderful LA trumpeter who studied with Jimmy. I believe the Mark took Jimmy's place at Cal State Fullerton after Jimmy passed away. Mark is one of the most underrated trumpeters anywhere. He plays beautifully and really knows Jimmy's stuff.

Where do you live?

Al
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
oj
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 06 Jan 2003
Posts: 1699
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 12:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Al,

Great posts! Keep posting.

Pat,

H. Hardenberger (HH) studied with Stamp (when he was 14 years old). I asked HH this question:

The Stamp book (edition BIM) says that you should use force when bending?

Here is part of his answer:

Yes - absolutely wrong! It’s the same with the Schlossberg book written by his son in law. Schlossberg wrote out exercises like a doctor prescribing medicine for each of his students. Most certainly very precise! In fact I have a copy of Stamps lesson when he as a very young man went to Schlossberg – a little prescription for next weeks exercise. Someone then collected these notes and put it together as a book. What we also know is that Arban, Clarke etc, the text in the books serve no purpose. It is not what you practice, but how you practice.

Many do not succeed when they try these bends. The tone does not change – it is still a G or F regardless of what they do (HH makes ”locked throat sound” with his voice). This is a sign of stiffness. You have to solve that problem first.


more here:

http://abel.hive.no/trumpet/hardenberger/

Regards,

Ole

P.S.
Al, the Clarke thing you mentioned is here:

http://abel.hive.no/trumpet/exercise/clarke1.html
http://abel.hive.no/trumpet/exercise/clarke2.html
http://abel.hive.no/trumpet/exercise/clarke3.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> James Stamp All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group