• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Comparison of old Purviance and Reeves mouthpieces


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Mouthpieces
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Still Trying
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Jul 2002
Posts: 902
Location: Keller, TX

PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:24 pm    Post subject: Comparison of old Purviance and Reeves mouthpieces Reply with quote

I just "discovered" an old 4*K4 Purviance that played years ago, and rediscovered just what a nice mouthpiece it is. I see that now the Reeves mouthpiece company markets the old Purviance mouthpieces as a separate product line from Reeves mouthpieces. I have also seen many references to Reeves mouthpieces on different posts on TH.

I've never played a Reeves piece and I'm wondering how they compare as far as playing characteristics go with the Purviance pieces. Any of you folks out there ever played both types of mouthpiece? If so maybe you can help satisfy my curriosity. Thanks.
_________________
S. T.

What do we have that we did not receive, and if we received it, why do we glory, as if we received it not?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dbacon
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Nov 2001
Posts: 8592

PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Play the Purviance! Wish I still had mine, a great mouthpiece.

Sound by the pound!! The 5*K4 worked well for most playing, 4*K4 would light up the band.

Bob's 42 rim is similar, his "S" cup close. 69 backbore, that's pretty much the old 4*K4.
Caroll Purviance used a 27 throat, Bob's is a 28 stock.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BRSpringer
Veteran Member


Joined: 04 Jan 2003
Posts: 114
Location: Lee's Summit, MO

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FWIW: I asked Bob at one of the ITG conferences (1998?) about the Purviance backbore and he replied, "It's somewhere between a 2 and a 692."
I agree, the 4*K4 is a great mouthpiece. I've been playing one since 1981.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbacon
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Nov 2001
Posts: 8592

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You know, I lost mine in about 1981......say hi to Jay.......he owes me $$!...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
giakara
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 3832
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I play Reeves for many years (43S, ES) and last year i try a vintage 4*3 and i fall in love with it , the sound is fantasic and the cup great , for me the best commercial piece ever made my only problems is the the rim , i prefer the Reeves 43 against Purviance 4*3 and the throat , i can play pieces with #28 throat only and the purviance has #27 anyway i order some Reeves/Purviance underparts and i try it for one or two months and now i play again with my old Reeves pieces , i sold my new underparts but i never gonna sell my vintage 4*3 .

Regards
_________________
Lawler TL5-1A Bb 2015
Lawler TL6-1A Bb 2004
Lawler TL5-1A Bb 2003
Getzen eterna 910 C
Getzen eterna 850 cornet
Selmer Paris 3 valve picc
Yamaha 731 flugel
Carol mini pocket
Reeves/Purviance mpcs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pocket Monkeys
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 598

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have, and use, both regularly. I have original CM Purviance mouthpieces labeled 5*3 and 4*3. Also, I have Reeves Purviance RP9 and RP9A. To be completely honest, all four play well. The CM Purviance pieces with the larger shanks seem to gap very well with my Lawler. The Reeves pieces with the Reeves standard blank (5 shank) seem to gap very well my Bach. I've read here and there that CM Purviance pieces were frequently customized without being marked. Also, I've read that the Reeves pieces play differently than the originals. To all of that I say...whatever. Here's my opinion, the four I have play very similiar and very well. I enjoy them greatly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dbacon
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Nov 2001
Posts: 8592

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

giakara wrote:
I play Reeves for many years (43S, ES) and last year i try a vintage 4*3 and i fall in love with it , the sound is fantasic and the cup great , for me the best commercial piece ever made my only problems is the the rim , i prefer the Reeves 43 against Purviance 4*3 and the throat , i can play pieces with #28 throat only and the purviance has #27 anyway i order some Reeves/Purviance underparts and i try it for one or two months and now i play again with my old Reeves pieces , i sold my new underparts but i never gonna sell my vintage 4*3 .

Regards


I had a set of Purviance 5*3, 4*3 as well. Worked with a Mt. Vernon 3C, rim's different but similar diameter. Those were great pieces.

Bob continued the original sizes for some years, but when he put them out on Reeves blanks they lost the original sound.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
razeontherock
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 05 Jun 2004
Posts: 10609
Location: The land of GR and Getzen

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're saying it's the blank that made the sound??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TrumpetAce
Veteran Member


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 191
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Believe it! The blank can make ALL the difference in the world.
_________________
TA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TrumpetAce
Veteran Member


Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 191
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Believe it! The blank can make ALL the difference in the world.
_________________
TA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
giakara
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 3832
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree the blank is the only visible different to my eyes and ears betwen the vintage and the new one and the differnce belive me is big.

Regards
_________________
Lawler TL5-1A Bb 2015
Lawler TL6-1A Bb 2004
Lawler TL5-1A Bb 2003
Getzen eterna 910 C
Getzen eterna 850 cornet
Selmer Paris 3 valve picc
Yamaha 731 flugel
Carol mini pocket
Reeves/Purviance mpcs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pocket Monkeys
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 598

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree as well. The CM Purviance blank has more mass and a larger shank. The Reeves Purviance (standard) blank has less mass and a standard shank. Variations between mass and gap can make a large difference in the end. Still, I like them both...but if I had to choose, I'd take the CM Purviance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Still Trying
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 20 Jul 2002
Posts: 902
Location: Keller, TX

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the blank makes that much difference, what is the rational for not using a copy of the old Purviance blank? I mean if all the other dimensions are being replicated, why not replicate the blank also?

I'm almost surprised that there are so few posters on this thread that actually remember the original Purviance pieces. At one time they seemed to be very popular and with good reason. Of course I asked for a comparison between the original Purviance and the Reeves pieces. Maybe there just aren't that many people who have played both.
_________________
S. T.

What do we have that we did not receive, and if we received it, why do we glory, as if we received it not?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pocket Monkeys
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 598

PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reeves does offer the Purviance blank in a one piece model. However, it's my understanding that because the shop is set up for two piece mouthpiece making that's what they push. It's faster, cheaper, and easier for them to make copies on the Reeves blank. Many large internet stores carry the two piece Reeves Purviance pieces (standard blank) in their regular stock for as little as $99. I ordered a one piece Purviance blank from Reeves sometime ago. I waited 9 weeks for it to arrive and paid much more than $99.

Still, you asked how they compare. My opinion is that the CM Purviance mpcs work well with horns that require a larger gap and the Reeves Purviance work better with horns which require a smaller gap. Obviously, this may not be true for everyone...it's just what I've found.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
surfhorn
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 982
Location: Aptos, CA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use my 5*K4 with my 1964 Olds Super. Its the horn I leave out on a stand and use to run scales while watching TV. I consider the set up my 'california cool' horn.
_________________
Pleasure Point Brass Band
Bach 180S 37 ML, 1970
Kanstul WB1600 (silver)
Olds Super, 1964 w/ C.M. Purviance 5*K4
Marcinkiewicz: E8.4 Shew 1.75
Schilke Flugel; Kanstul Flugel
Kanstul Valve Bone
Surfboard quiver: 15
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pocket Monkeys
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 598

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's the best post on this thread!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John Mohan
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 13 Nov 2001
Posts: 9830
Location: Chicago, Illinois

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

surfhorn wrote:
Surfboard quiver: 15

That's impressive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
gbdeamer
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Posts: 2302

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John Mohan wrote:
surfhorn wrote:
Surfboard quiver: 15

That's impressive.



LOL!!

What search criteria did you use to get to that particular line in a thread that's over 5 years old?
_________________
1987 Bach Strad 37
2005 Bach Strad 43*
ACB Doubler's Flugel
1948 Holton Model 48
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
giakara
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 3832
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I bet that John is make a recherch and ivery soon he will hold a Purviance 5*3 , and i am sure after all those years of comvesations that he wlll love it.

Regards
_________________
Lawler TL5-1A Bb 2015
Lawler TL6-1A Bb 2004
Lawler TL5-1A Bb 2003
Getzen eterna 910 C
Getzen eterna 850 cornet
Selmer Paris 3 valve picc
Yamaha 731 flugel
Carol mini pocket
Reeves/Purviance mpcs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
John Mohan
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 13 Nov 2001
Posts: 9830
Location: Chicago, Illinois

PostPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gbdeamer wrote:
John Mohan wrote:
surfhorn wrote:
Surfboard quiver: 15

That's impressive.



LOL!!

What search criteria did you use to get to that particular line in a thread that's over 5 years old?


giakara wrote:
I bet that John is make a recherch and ivery soon he will hold a Purviance 5*3 , and i am sure after all those years of comvesations that he wlll love it.

Regards


You are clearly telepathic.

Actually, I'm thinking of buying both a 4*K4 and a 4*3. But I'm pretty sure the 4*3 would be best for me, since its rim is nearly identical to a 43. Then of course, I'll want a 5*3....

Does anyone know if the 5*3 has an identical rim to the 4*3? The Reeves Website lists them both as 43/64", but also claims the 5*3 has a "Larger diameter deep cup". Perhaps, it just means "larger" than the smaller mouthpieces in the line, not specifically larger than the 4*3.

And does anyone know if the 5*3 cup shape is close to the 43C or the 43M? Actually, I should just call Bob on Monday, shouldn't I? But in the meantime, any info would be appreciated.

Cheers,

John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Mouthpieces All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group