• FAQ  • Search  • Memberlist  • Usergroups   • Register   • Profile  • Log in to check your private messages  • Log in 

Valve alignments, makes a real difference?


Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
improver
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Posts: 1455

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:29 am    Post subject: Valve alignments, makes a real difference? Reply with quote

Does a valve alignment make a difference? How much does it improve the blow and playability? Is it something you can do yourself with pads and felts?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
lipshurt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 2642
Location: vista ca

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes and yes
Easy to do yourself. Takes an ounce of brainpower, access to thin spacers of various thickness. Many ways to get spacers:

Make them with a paper punch and scissors. Thickesses you will need are .005, .010. .020. Materials can be plastic, like hotel keys, laminated ID cards, plastic sheet, etc.
UPSTOKES:
Usually if your horn alignment is off, it will be because the original felts have compressed. Keep those same felts and add a spacer. It could take up tp .035 to get back to the right thickness.

DOWNSTROKES: here its a bit more complicated but for Bach horns with rubber inserts in the top caps, those don’t compress, so it will keep its original downstroke alignment, which still need to be improved. You will need some little shims to go between the stem and button to get more downstroke. To raise the downstroke you can add a shim under the rubber. Herder to make though cuz you can’t use a paper punch. Use a gasket punch set. Cheap is ok.

To determine the alignment you need a mirror on a stick or an iPhone/iPad endoscope (30 bucks) and those work pretty good. Use the 90 degree angle mirror they come with. The picture is a little blurry but good enough to see if the edges line up in there.

$30 endoscope
$3 paper punch
$3 for .005, .010., .020 shims from McMaster/Carr to go under button
Ounce of brainpower can be hard to find but it’s transferable from one person to another, so ask around
_________________
Mouthpiece Maker
vintage Trumpet design enthusiast
www.meeuwsenmouthpieces.com
www.youtube.com/lipshurt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JayKosta
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 3306
Location: Endwell NY USA

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First - test all the valve combinations, do any of them seem to work really well - with good clean/clear sound?

Then check and compare the other valve combinations - which positions are least satisfactory?

For the unsatisfactory positions, try moving the valve very slightly up or down, and see if you can detect an improvement or worsening.

For a DIY attempt, I suggest basing changes from actual playing - not from viewing mechanical alignment. An experienced tech who has lots of experience might recognize the mechanical alignment that would give good results, and that makes it quicker to do the job. But in the end, the final criteria is 'how it plays' - NOT how it looks or measures.

Jay
_________________
Most Important Note ? - the next one !
KNOW (see) what the next note is BEFORE you have to play it.
PLAY the next note 'on time' and 'in rhythm'.
Oh ya, watch the conductor - they set what is 'on time'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LittleRusty
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 12664
Location: Gardena, Ca

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JayKosta wrote:
First - test all the valve combinations, do any of them seem to work really well - with good clean/clear sound?

Then check and compare the other valve combinations - which positions are least satisfactory?

For the unsatisfactory positions, try moving the valve very slightly up or down, and see if you can detect an improvement or worsening.

For a DIY attempt, I suggest basing changes from actual playing - not from viewing mechanical alignment. An experienced tech who has lots of experience might recognize the mechanical alignment that would give good results, and that makes it quicker to do the job. But in the end, the final criteria is 'how it plays' - NOT how it looks or measures.

Jay

I think trying this can help determine if an alignment might help you, but it does miss two potential alignment issues.

If the pads are too thick, and prevent the valve from going fully down or fully up, you cannot test without removing the pads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jon_Manness
Regular Member


Joined: 08 Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The washers from http://www.jlsmithco.com/valve-washers can get your alignment pretty darn close. I used ID's 700585 (1/64"), 700587 (1/32"), and 700591 (1/16") for my Conn 22b. I use my iPhone to eyeball, but it does become a "feel" thing, especially as you adjust the upstroke by 1/64".

As for what valve alignments do, they open the sound and improve intonation. I like to check my high E's and F's while fine-tuning to make sure those are slotting where I expect them to be.
_________________
Jon Manness
Stomvi VR-II Big Bell
Stomvi Master
Stomvi Elite Copper Flugel
'37 Conn 80a Cornet
'42 Conn 22b Trumpet
Stomvi-USA Mouthpieces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
JayKosta
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 3306
Location: Endwell NY USA

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 5:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you start removing the various felts / corks / spacers / etc., BE SURE to keep them separated based on their original location on each specific valve.

And a WARNING, depending on the age of the horn, there's a good chance that something might be broken or torn in the process of removal or reinstall. So be prepared with a good supply of replacements, or the material and tools to make them.

From personal experience ... there are many 'Oh @#$%' moments with DIY !

An amateur practices until he gets it 'right', a pro practices until he can't get it 'wrong'.

Jay
_________________
Most Important Note ? - the next one !
KNOW (see) what the next note is BEFORE you have to play it.
PLAY the next note 'on time' and 'in rhythm'.
Oh ya, watch the conductor - they set what is 'on time'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TrumpetMD
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 2416
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jon_Manness wrote:
As for what valve alignments do, they open the sound and improve intonation. I like to check my high E's and F's while fine-tuning to make sure those are slotting where I expect them to be.

I'm not trying to be argumentative. But I wonder if there is any objective proof that this statement is true. It seems like it's something can be easily tested with a blinded test of several trumpets before-and-after an alignment.

Mike
_________________
Bach Stradivarius 43* Trumpet (1974), Bach 6C Mouthpiece.
Bach Stradivarius 184 Cornet (1988), Yamaha 13E4 Mouthpiece
Olds L-12 Flugelhorn (1969), Yamaha 13F4 Mouthpiece.
Plus a few other Bach, Getzen, Olds, Carol, HN White, and Besson horns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lipshurt
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 2642
Location: vista ca

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

People argue for different reasons I guess sometimes just to pass the time, or out lack of knowledge but:

Alignments should be mechanically right. There is no other situation that will make a horn play better. Sometimes there may be a mechanical situation where getting one surface lined up makes another surface worse and then there will need to be a compromise. Those are pretty rare though.

Getting within 1/64 is pretty good but not quite good enough. That is .012 which is not bad you can notice a horn that’s .012 out .

I suppose it’s possible that a player could get the horn aligned and then won’t like it. (assuming that the alignment actually improved the alignment) That does not mean it was better out of alignment, it just means that that player does not like that horn.

Really proper alignment jobs should include adjusting the abutting surfaces by machining so that one standard pad material which doesn’t not compress can be used in each valve and not need any shims. That way you get a few sets of pads and have a lifetime of easily restored proper alignments. You pay one time. That is your basic reeves alignment but others can do it too.

In any event it’s not a question of if it should be done
_________________
Mouthpiece Maker
vintage Trumpet design enthusiast
www.meeuwsenmouthpieces.com
www.youtube.com/lipshurt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JayKosta
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 3306
Location: Endwell NY USA

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lipshurt wrote:
...
Alignments should be mechanically right. There is no other situation that will make a horn play better. Sometimes there may be a mechanical situation where getting one surface lined up makes another surface worse and then there will need to be a compromise. Those are pretty rare though.

Getting within 1/64 is pretty good but not quite good enough. That is .012 which is not bad you can notice a horn that’s .012 out .
...

------------------
I'd appreciate your opinion of what 'mechanically right' actually means. How many of the openings do you inspect and adjust?

In the simple VALVE UP position there are 4 separate openings involved - the 2 in the piston, and the corresponding 2 in the case.
In the VALVE DOWN position there 8 separate openings - the above 4, plus an additional 4 for the slide extension.

Do you have experience measuring the exact placement of these openings on a variety of trumpets? And how closely do they come to ALL being properly located for 'mechanically right' alignment?

Jay
_________________
Most Important Note ? - the next one !
KNOW (see) what the next note is BEFORE you have to play it.
PLAY the next note 'on time' and 'in rhythm'.
Oh ya, watch the conductor - they set what is 'on time'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon_Manness
Regular Member


Joined: 08 Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TrumpetMD wrote:
Jon_Manness wrote:
As for what valve alignments do, they open the sound and improve intonation. I like to check my high E's and F's while fine-tuning to make sure those are slotting where I expect them to be.

I'm not trying to be argumentative. But I wonder if there is any objective proof that this statement is true. It seems like it's something can be easily tested with a blinded test of several trumpets before-and-after an alignment.

Mike


Hi Mike,

Just sharing my experience.

-Jon
_________________
Jon Manness
Stomvi VR-II Big Bell
Stomvi Master
Stomvi Elite Copper Flugel
'37 Conn 80a Cornet
'42 Conn 22b Trumpet
Stomvi-USA Mouthpieces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
TrumpetMD
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 2416
Location: Maryland

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jon_Manness wrote:
TrumpetMD wrote:
Jon_Manness wrote:
As for what valve alignments do, they open the sound and improve intonation. I like to check my high E's and F's while fine-tuning to make sure those are slotting where I expect them to be.

I'm not trying to be argumentative. But I wonder if there is any objective proof that this statement is true. It seems like it's something can be easily tested with a blinded test of several trumpets before-and-after an alignment.

Mike


Hi Mike,

Just sharing my experience.

-Jon

Absolutely, Jon. And I think our individual experiences have value. That's why I prefaced my reply that I wasn't trying to be argumentative. I was just wondering if anyone has objectively evaluated the benefits of a valve alignment.

Mike
_________________
Bach Stradivarius 43* Trumpet (1974), Bach 6C Mouthpiece.
Bach Stradivarius 184 Cornet (1988), Yamaha 13E4 Mouthpiece
Olds L-12 Flugelhorn (1969), Yamaha 13F4 Mouthpiece.
Plus a few other Bach, Getzen, Olds, Carol, HN White, and Besson horns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jon_Manness
Regular Member


Joined: 08 Jul 2018
Posts: 26
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would gladly use thinner pads than 1/64 if they were available, but I couldn't find the proper ID and OD dimensions of pads for the 22b. I would also experiment with loosening each top valve cap so the valve would sit higher, as well as slightly depress each valve to hear if the sound is better or worse.

For me, I got it close enough and the horn rips!!!

lipshurt wrote:
People argue for different reasons I guess sometimes just to pass the time, or out lack of knowledge but:

Alignments should be mechanically right. There is no other situation that will make a horn play better. Sometimes there may be a mechanical situation where getting one surface lined up makes another surface worse and then there will need to be a compromise. Those are pretty rare though.

Getting within 1/64 is pretty good but not quite good enough. That is .012 which is not bad you can notice a horn that’s .012 out .

I suppose it’s possible that a player could get the horn aligned and then won’t like it. (assuming that the alignment actually improved the alignment) That does not mean it was better out of alignment, it just means that that player does not like that horn.

Really proper alignment jobs should include adjusting the abutting surfaces by machining so that one standard pad material which doesn’t not compress can be used in each valve and not need any shims. That way you get a few sets of pads and have a lifetime of easily restored proper alignments. You pay one time. That is your basic reeves alignment but others can do it too.

In any event it’s not a question of if it should be done

_________________
Jon Manness
Stomvi VR-II Big Bell
Stomvi Master
Stomvi Elite Copper Flugel
'37 Conn 80a Cornet
'42 Conn 22b Trumpet
Stomvi-USA Mouthpieces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
James Becker
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2827
Location: Littleton, MA

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As one of several that do valve alignments professionaly, the feedback from our customers is invaluable. Also worth pointing out, the degree of measuable deviations can vary widely from a matter of a few thousanths of an inch up to .020", .030", .040" or more. It's been our experience that accomplished players are able to detect corrections as little as .005", so it can be difficult to say with certainty how much improvement a player is going to experience without our measurements. What we do know is what our customers tell us, and that is our alignments work for them. Otherwise why would they continue to return again and again or refer fellow trumpet players our way for service.

In addition, every valve alignment card on file includes mouthpipe venturi and receiver gap measurements in order to document if your intrument is within design specifications. We also perform a free valve seal test to determine if leakage is effecting your instrument's playability.

Ultimately, it comes down to taking into account everything that contributes in order to optimize your playing experience. No guess work or "flying blind".

My two cents.
_________________
James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com

Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Tritone
Veteran Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Posts: 148

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TrumpetMD wrote:
Jon_Manness wrote:
As for what valve alignments do, they open the sound and improve intonation. I like to check my high E's and F's while fine-tuning to make sure those are slotting where I expect them to be.

I'm not trying to be argumentative. But I wonder if there is any objective proof that this statement is true. It seems like it's something can be easily tested with a blinded test of several trumpets before-and-after an alignment.

Mike


I like these comments a lot, even though I personally have had valve alignments done and felt they were helpful.

The problem is not just with valve alignments -- it's really with so many of the tweaks and so forth that many of us trumpet players are familiar with.

Whether it's "core" or "projection" (or the benefits -- or lack thereof -- of valve alignments), etc., etc., there's rarely any objective evaluation going on.

For example, it's usually the player himself/herself saying whether he/she thinks whatever helps or doesn't -- but that's hardly objective. This is true whether it's an 'accomplished' player or otherwise.

An objective evaluation would require that you compare horns with and horns without the tweak in question and do so without knowing which horn is in your hands. Which, of course, you can't do yourself since you can't play the same horn at the same time both before and after the tweak. You could do a decent experiment comparing a bunch of horns with the tweak to bunch of horns without the tweak, and use a number of different players who test each one without knowing whether it had the tweak or not, but that would not be easy to do.

Moreover, for some (many?) of us, there's a bias toward believing that whatever tweak we just paid for sure did some good, even if it's just a little bit. Maybe you even get other players to get the same thing done. We're often called "gearheads" for a reason, and I don't know any player who wouldn't be eager to pay within reason for something that would help him/her play better.

Additionally, what truly works for one horn may not do anything on another horn, and then we're left with different opinions and thus a gray zone.

And as a fundamental challenge, there's no clear definition of just what one player is referring tone when he/she mentions "core", "projection", "blow", "stuffiness" and so on. We each know what we mean individually, but is that really the same as what someone else means?

I guess the bottom line may be that if it works for you and you feel it's worth the money you spent, great.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James Becker
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2827
Location: Littleton, MA

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very recently during a visit to have his Bach C serviced, retired Metropolitan Opera trumpeter, Jim Pandolfi, selected a new Bach 190S37. Accompanied by Boston Pops trumpeter, Rich Kelley listening. After selecting his new trumpet Jim asked me to “do that thing you do”. They played the most amazing duets while I worked. When I completed blueprinting, Jim played his new Bach Bb again for Rich. Both, without exaggeration, agreed Jim’s new Bb demonstrated greater ease of play and evenness across registers. Witnessing these two world class players reenforced the validity of our work. As a result Rich ordered the identical model Bach 190S37 with our full blueprint service.

We where blessed to have players like these two in our shop. Hearing firsthand before and after our adjustments made it all worthwhile.
_________________
James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com

Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
shofarguy
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Posts: 7012
Location: AZ

PostPosted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the subject of bing objective:

Back a number of years, I was trying to put together a project with Byron Autrey and would talk with him weekly. During those conversations on the phone, I tried to gain as much knowledge as I could by asking leading questions that would give Byron a rabbit path on which to relay experiences and discoveries.

In one such conversation, Byron talked about how he had developed what he called "a neutral embouchure." What he meant was that he could play any style horn and all of the design variations equally. So, whether it was a trumpet with a lot of resistance up front or one that allowed the player to blow through the horn, whether it was a trumpet, flugelhorn or cornet, he had purposefully developed the ability to play that style of instrument optimally.

He also told me that a development player only has the first 15 seconds of play to make assessments. After that, the subconscious brain kicks in and begins to make adjustments to the player's approach to the instrument in order to "move" its response toward the player's optimum. This understanding meant that Byron was able to assess more accurately, the actual changes made to any given horn. He not only understood instrument dynamics, but also player dynamics.

The same sort of thing happens when we listen. One of the things we both had in common was the ability to dissect timbre into frequency ranges and asses the overtone series for strengths and weaknesses. When he talked about these kinds of things, I could relate to what he said.

All this is to say that the skills needed for accurately analyzing what goes on when playing an instrument are separate from the skills needed to actually play the instrument well. I have had conversations with some pretty good top-call musicians who could not tell me what was happening or what they heard beyond rudimentary observations like "core," intonation, slotting and the like. Others could describe more in-depth characteristics, but perhaps didn't play as well and certainly didn't have the same level of fame.
_________________
Brian A. Douglas

Flip Oakes Wild Thing Bb Trumpet in copper
Flip Oakes Wild Thing Flugelhorn in copper


There is one reason that I practice: to be ready at the downbeat when the final trumpet sounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James Becker
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2827
Location: Littleton, MA

PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2019 5:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The notion that some have it and some do not possess the ability to tell the difference, or a select few have the knowledge of how thing works clouds this discussion.

The feed back we've receive from players has been overwhelming in favor of our blueprinting/alignment services.

To paraphrase Tom Rolfs when I was trying to explain what I intended to to do to his trumpet, "Stop, I don't want to know, I don't need to know, I just want to play it." A truly refreshing remark by arguably one of the finest trumpet players today.
_________________
James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com

Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
shofarguy
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 18 Sep 2007
Posts: 7012
Location: AZ

PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2019 6:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

James,

My comment was directed toward the idea that a person cannot "objectively" tell whether a change to a horn had an effect or not, without a double-blind test or some other "scientific" method. I tried to point out that listening, feeling and playing are different sets of skills that can be individually developed.

I certainly don't play trumpet as well as Byron Autrey did or as well as Flip Oakes does, but I am able to hear how a horn and player are interacting and describe with good accuracy what the player is feeling. I can identify changes in sound and describe them in a manner that is useful to the player.

I'm saying that, yes, players will tend to hear what they believe they will hear, but a person can learn to extract desire from the senses and analyze what is actually going on, if they pursue those skills. It's similar to when a person decides to buy a certain model of car. All of a sudden those cars are everywhere! They were always there, but the person added interest and knowledge of what to look for and so begins to recognize what before was anonymous.
_________________
Brian A. Douglas

Flip Oakes Wild Thing Bb Trumpet in copper
Flip Oakes Wild Thing Flugelhorn in copper


There is one reason that I practice: to be ready at the downbeat when the final trumpet sounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James Becker
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 2827
Location: Littleton, MA

PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely playing an instrument as neutral as possible allows for a less biased evaluation of characteristics.

Now turn that around, I like to think of alignments as making the trumpet neutral for the player. Making the sound path less disruptive allows for fewer undesirable standing waves that make for uneven response and timbre, and in some instances poor pitch. This way I am NOT imposing changes to the instrument's design "recipe", simply improving execution of the original design.

Here's an example of my blueprinting of a Bach Chicago C180L229*.

Piston misalignment before correction: #1 up +.018" down +.017", #2 up +.027" down +.014", #3 up +.026 down +.006"

Receiver gap .101" with my Bach 2C, .134" with brand new Symphonic Bach 1C. Well withing acceptable range +.030" or -.030" from factory target of .125"

Mouthpipe venturi .3498"

In the words of the owner "Hi James - you blueprinted my Bach Chicago C last week and I just wanted to thank you, what a difference!"
_________________
James Becker
Brass Repair Specialist Since 1977
Osmun Music Inc.
77 Powdermill Road Rt.62
Acton, MA 01720
www.osmun.com

Our workshop is as close as your nearest UPS store https://www.ups.com/dropoff?loc=en_US
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
OldSchoolEuph
Heavyweight Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 2441

PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2019 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shofarguy wrote:
On the subject of bing objective:

Back a number of years, I was trying to put together a project with Byron Autrey and would talk with him weekly. During those conversations on the phone, I tried to gain as much knowledge as I could by asking leading questions that would give Byron a rabbit path on which to relay experiences and discoveries.

In one such conversation, Byron talked about how he had developed what he called "a neutral embouchure." What he meant was that he could play any style horn and all of the design variations equally. So, whether it was a trumpet with a lot of resistance up front or one that allowed the player to blow through the horn, whether it was a trumpet, flugelhorn or cornet, he had purposefully developed the ability to play that style of instrument optimally.

He also told me that a development player only has the first 15 seconds of play to make assessments. After that, the subconscious brain kicks in and begins to make adjustments to the player's approach to the instrument in order to "move" its response toward the player's optimum. This understanding meant that Byron was able to assess more accurately, the actual changes made to any given horn. He not only understood instrument dynamics, but also player dynamics.

The same sort of thing happens when we listen. One of the things we both had in common was the ability to dissect timbre into frequency ranges and asses the overtone series for strengths and weaknesses. When he talked about these kinds of things, I could relate to what he said.

All this is to say that the skills needed for accurately analyzing what goes on when playing an instrument are separate from the skills needed to actually play the instrument well. I have had conversations with some pretty good top-call musicians who could not tell me what was happening or what they heard beyond rudimentary observations like "core," intonation, slotting and the like. Others could describe more in-depth characteristics, but perhaps didn't play as well and certainly didn't have the same level of fame.


It must have been Byron's influence on me that had me vigorously discussing this topic with Dale Olsen - with which we entertained a bit of a crowd on Mark Metzler's porch a couple years ago. Just as the answer to the OP is complex, so is play-testing. I, for instance, contend that a strong musician who is a weak trumpet player is far more sensitive to hardware differences because that subconscious ability to compensate is not as developed. Dale leans more toward Cardwell's conviction that play testing is inherently flawed by bias. (Dales book on the subject is back in print now http://www.balquhiddermusic.com/r-dale-olson-projects/sensory-evaluation-of-brass-instruments ). I think, for the capabl player who is making a conscious effort to eliminate their biases, play testing is manageable if one recognizes that they will, inevitably, adapt so impressions must be garnered quickly, and with devised objective test methods.

All that being said, as for the OP, alignment can make a big difference sometimes, and none others. The obvious case of not being helpful is when the instrument is poorly made and the proportionate placement of the ports in the piston and in the casing are simply not matched. Nothing fixes that. I have encountered horns where improving alignment had no effect - and others where it helped noticeably - the point I would make though is that if done right, the effect should never be negative so its a good idea.

The hard question to answer is can you tell it made a difference, or have your biases taken over. Dale's methods cancel that out. The results for those of us not a trained and disciplined as Byron can be surprising.
_________________
Ron Berndt
www.trumpet-history.com

2017 Austin Winds Stage 466
1962 Mt. Vernon Bach 43
1954 Holton 49 Stratodyne
1927 Conn 22B
1957 Holton 27 cornet
1985 Yamaha YEP-621
1975 Yamaha YEP-321 Custom
1965 Besson Baritone
1975 Olds Recording R-20
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    trumpetherald.com Forum Index -> Horns All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group