lipshurt Heavyweight Member
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Posts: 2642 Location: vista ca
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
hmmmm
probably none of them, but the regular 453 bore is closest. For sure not the Large bore committee.
I Was playing committees for a few years, and got the itch to get a 6310 Z when they came out. I went to Bob Malones shop and took my committee, and a good friend who is a really good player, who was going to CAL-ARTS.
I would say they both played pretty close to the same, except the committee had a WAAAY better slot for High F. The guys at the shop said that they could do the "shew tweak" for free and that would make the high F slot great. Sure go ahead. He pulled out a steel plug in he shape of a mouthpiece shank but a little bit undersize so it hit the end of the leadpipe. He puts it in the reciever and than gives one pretty hard hit straight in with a hammer. All done, free.
The high F might have been a little different. I played that 6301z for couple years. That same day i bought the shew, my buddy bought the committee on form me on the way home. He prob could tell i was making a mistake on the shew. I liked the 6310z but i could never hear it as well on gigs as the committee. I got a new committee about two years later. A 1958 deluxe. Played that one for a few years too. Then got a connstellation etc.
The 8301z plays just like the 6310z i think, maybe a little more solid feeling. Not really like a committee very much though. Not in sound or feel, but i guess similar in blow resistance. Neither one is stuffy or "big".
The large bore committee is really big feeling, nothing like shew horn _________________ Mouthpiece Maker
vintage Trumpet design enthusiast
www.meeuwsenmouthpieces.com
www.youtube.com/lipshurt |
|